2 IPCC, 2014: Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working
Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel
onClimate Change.
The scenario analysis conducted this year builds on that
completed in 2022. This year we incorporate use of the more
ambitious NZE scenario (from the SDS scenario used last year) as
it forms an input into the 1.5°C pathway used by the SBTi against
which we are aligned.
These scenarios have been supplemented with additional sources
that are speciic to each risk to inform any assumptions included
in projections. Our scenario analysis includes qualitative and some
quantiied impacts where the underlying data is available and
where the current understanding of the risks is robust.
We have analysed the climate-related risks under all three
scenarios and identiied plans to mitigate against the impacts
of these risks and take advantage of opportunities. They have
been incorporated into our transition pathway to net zero and
into divisional, management and the Board’s strategic framework
within our current expenditure envelope. Weare conident that
implementation of these actions will result ina business resilient
tothe discussed climate-related risks.
Strategic report
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
RISKS
Five transitional and two physical climate-related risks have been identiied that could have an impact on our business. Three of them
(i) decarbonisation of SA (and UK) grid, (ii) pace of decarbonisation across supply chain and (iii) new technology for kilns are the most
material to our operations. Our Net Zero plan and emissions reduction initiatives form the basis of our mitigation strategies.
TCFD REPORT CONTINUED
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
TCFD Category Transition (Current and Emerging Regulation)
Carbon pricing (carbon tax) in own operations
Own operations
Higher costs associated
with energy
Medium term
Certain (5)
Intermediate (5)
25
UK and South Africa
manufacturing division
Scope 1 and 2 emissions
Norcros views the implementation of operational carbon pricing as a certainty, which is applied
to our gas and electricity used in tile manufacturing. We expect signiicant but gradual price
increases in the medium term, with greater forecast price rises in the NZE Scenario. An estimate
for the impact of carbon pricing of scope 1 and 2 emissions for 2023 assuming no change going
forward, using IEA price forecasts, projected in the long term are as follows:
USm
USm
USm
Carbon pricing UK
STEPS
NZE
Carbon pricing South Africa
SA expected carbonprice
NZE
The table above illustrates the impact assuming our scope 1 and 2 emissions are unchanged from
2023 levels. However, the impact of the risk is expected to be moderated through our transition plan,
which factors in reductions of our scope 1 and 2 emissions to minimal levels, to achieve our target of
net zero by 2040.
Mitigation: Key near-term scope 1 actions consist of improvements in the tile manufacturing
processes, such as heat recovery systems and energy eficient burners in kilns, and initiatives to
reduce scope 2 include on-site and purchased renewableelectricity.
TCFD Category Transition (Emerging Regulation)
Carbon pricing in the value chain
Upstream
Increased cost of purchased
goods and inbound
transportation
Medium term
Certain (5)
Intermediate (5)
25
Global, all divisions
Scope 3 emissions
(Category 1)
Parts of our supply chain include the processing of primary metals and building materials. New,
low emission production processes are still being developed for commercial use and these could
lead to increased costs in our supply chain. Emissions intensive basic materials industries are also
exposed to global regulatory and policy decisions in the drive to reduce emissions, and these
changing policies may also impact our supply chain.
Mitigation: The diversity of supply sources reduces this risk to the Group. Norcros engages with its
suppliers to determine the embodied carbon for certain raw materials and then ensures they work
together to “design out” carbon products and processes. This includes considering lighter weight
options (e.g. thinner tiles) and lower embodied carbon inputs (where the raw materials used have
acceptable technical qualities with lower carbon emissions). Our Net Zero Transition Plan details
our pathway to reducing these emissions.
Business area
Impact measure
Primary potential
inancial impact
Risk rating
Time horizon
Location
Likelihood
Measurement
Key
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
TCFD Category Transition (Market and Reputation)
Reliance on third parties or technologies to decarbonise
Own operations
and Upstream
Higher costs,
lower revenue
Medium term
Certain (5)
Low (3)
15
Global, all divisions
Scope 3 emissions
Achievement of our NZ target in 2040 relies on certain factors beyond our control, for instance,
the decarbonisation of electricity grids, suppliers and retail partners meeting decarbonisation
timelines and the development of zero emissions transportation. Our NZ target is reliant on
technology to develop alternative fuels to run kilns (e.g., biogas or hydrogen) and requires the
purchase of electricity generated from renewable sources in South Africa, which is less readily
available than in the UK.
Mitigation: We work collaboratively with retailers and engage with governmental and industry
bodies to shape supply chain decarbonisation policy. We continue to invest in research and
development to promote the development of low carbon raw materials and technologies,
inparticular for energy intensive kilns.
TCFD Category Transition
Cost of capital linked to sustainability criteria
Own operations
Higher cost of capital
Medium term
Likely (4)
Low (3)
12
Global, all divisions
Scope 1, 2 and 3 emissions,
UK interest rates
Providers of capital (investors and banks) are increasingly incorporating sustainability into their
assessments, which represents a risk to the availability and cost of capital. The Group’s existing
£130m multicurrency revolving credit facility (which runs to October 2026) means the risk is
minimal in the short term. However, over the medium term investors and banks are expected to
be more stringent and withdraw funding or apply punitive charges if ongoing targets on emission
reduction are not aligned to their own net zero targets.
Mitigation: Norcros remains in continued dialogue with lenders, rating agencies and investors
to ensure climate change disclosure is in line with the latest regulatory requirements and our
progress towards our own net zero by 2040 target will help to mitigate this risk.
TCFD REPORT CONTINUED
Strategic report
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
RISKS CONTINUED
TCFD Category Transition
Customer and consumer pressure
Downstream
Lost revenue
Medium term
Likely (4)
Low (4)
16
Global, all divisions
Scope 3 emissions
Driven by industry standards and government regulation, large retailers and homebuilders require
suppliers to be at the forefront of embodied carbon reduction and the reduction of energy and
water in use by their products. There is a medium-term risk that some product lines are no longer
of interest to customers aligning with net zero.
Mitigation: We engage with customers and brands to ensure new products are designed to
meet changing customer requirements, ensuring our targets are aligned with theirs and meet
internal and external environmental requirements. Our new MI Framework also enables us the
track total revenue derived from low carbon products. Speciic initiatives include, for example,
Triton providing consumers a water/energy savings calculator and incorporating recycling and
minimisation of waste into packaging design. Abode has engaged with key customers to provide
“cradle to grave” emissions per kg for each product supplied.
Two physical climate-related risks have been identiied which become material under the RCP 8.5 scenario.
TCFD Category Physical (Chronic)
Flood risk
Own operations
Higher costs/disruption of
production
Long term
Possible (2)
Low (4)
8
South Africa, UK, China
Meteorological forecasting
The Munich Re Location Risk Intelligence Tool was used to assess physical climate risk, and
identiied six sites, especially in the RCP 8.5 scenario of having a High or Very High likelihood of
looding. These were located in South Africa, the United Kingdom and China. Of the six sites the
Grant Westield headquarters in Edinburgh are manufacturing facilities and could have the largest
net impact on the business, given the revenue contribution to the Group. The rest are sales or
administrative in nature and could be more easily relocated in case of potential looding or other
signiicantly disruptive climate event.
Mitigation: All divisions have business continuity and recovery plans which monitor risks to staff
and premises from meteorological events. Additionally all sites have lood damage insurance
cover with limits that relect the magnitude of risk, and the diversiied locations mean it is unlikely
that more than one of the identiied sites would lood at any given time.
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
TCFD REPORT CONTINUED
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
TCFD Category Physical (Chronic)
Water scarcity
Own operations
Higher costs/disruption of
production
Long term
Possible (1)
Low (3)
3
South Africa
Annual freshwater
resource levels
Despite issues regarding water scarcity persisting in Cape Town, none of our sites are at Very High
risk of water scarcity. In the RCP 8.5 scenario, only 1 of our 22 sites assessed was considered to be
at ‘Very High’ risk of future water stress. This site was located within Cape Town in South Africa and
produces adhesives for the manufacture of tiles.
Mitigation: Divisional managers closely monitor the supply of water as Cape Town has had serious
water scarcity issues in recent years. To date, this has not impacted production at the facility
and therefore the operation has presented resilience to the risk. Nonetheless management is
investigating the possibility of bore holes or tinkered water as an alternative. If insuficient water
was available, management would source from other locations in South Africa which are also used
to manufacture adhesives.
OPPORTUNITIES
TCFD Category Product and Services
Product design – resource eficient manufacturing
Own operations/
downstream
Increased sales/
decreased costs
Medium term
Likely (4)
Intermediate (6)
24
Global, all divisions
Scope 3 emissions,
revenues from energy
eficient products
(Green revenues)
Products manufactured though energy eficient processes with recycled raw materials are an
important part of our Net Zero transition plan. Increasingly our customers require data on the
embodied carbon in our products, with suppliers who report emissions and have certiied “green”
products being placed on a preferred list.
Impact: For example, Johnson Tiles UK has an independently veriied EPD certiicate across all
UK product ranges and uses a percentage of recycled ceramic in manufacturing tiles. Similarly,
Abode water ilter taps are 100% recyclable and use no chemicals in the manufacturing process
and as they are made from stainless steel, as less likely to scratch and hence have a longer
lifespan. 100% of Grant Westield’s panels are recyclable with the Programme for the Endorsement
of Forest Certiication (PEFC) conirming all timber used originates from responsibly managed
forests, contributing to the circular economy. There is also a signiicant opportunity to improve the
eficiency of the tile manufacturing process through heat and hot air recovery from the kilns and
the retroit of energy eficient burners.
TCFD REPORT CONTINUED
Strategic report
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
ENVIRONMENTAL, SOCIAL AND GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
TCFD REPORT CONTINUED
OPPORTUNITIES CONTINUED
TCFD Category Products
Product design – resource eficient products
Own operations/
downstream
Increased sales
Medium term
Likely (4)
High (8)
32
Triton, Abode
Scope 3 emissions,
revenues from energy
eficient products
(Green revenues)
Products which are energy or water eficient will reduce customer and consumer energy use
andhelp reduce scope 3 emissions. Innovative product design is key to continued revenue growth
and also helps to maintain competitive positioning.
Impact: To maximise this opportunity we target R&D and marketing spend and collaborate with
key clients to develop and sell best-in-class, resource eficient products. Triton’s eco models save
water and energy compared to more conventional showers. They are registered under the BMA’s
water eficiency scheme and have an EU energy label, while Triton’s electric showers are A rated
energy eficiency providers. This provides an opportunity to take a greater market share of an
increasingly environmentally driven market. The Abode Water Filter Tap also reduces reliance on
single use plastic water bottles and reduces water wastage with a 5LPM low limiter as it delivers
cold iltered water alongside domestic hot and cold water.
TCFD Category Resource Eficiency
Water, energy, waste savings
Own operations
Decreased costs
Medium term
Likely (4)
High (8)
32
Global, all divisions
Water and waste costs
per annum, Scope 1 and
2 emissions
Energy
The Group’s near-term decarbonisation proile includes opportunities for energy eficiency
andelectricity savings.
Impact: Using the heat from the kilns used to manufacture tiles in prior production stages and
technologies like retroitting more eficient burners to the kilns are also available and factored
into the Group’s decarbonisation proile. In the UK 93% of electricity is currently sourced from
renewable contracts.
Water
Various opportunities and initiatives exist to reduce water usage across the Group.
Impact: Johnson Tiles UK consumes large quantities of water in the tile manufacturing process.
Various initiatives are underway aimed at re-using up to 30% of the total factory usage and
removing water from another part of the production process.
Water tanks for harvesting rainwater could be installed as well as water iltration systems to provide
safe drinking water to stores, all reducing water usage.
Waste savings
Norcros aims to reduce and recycle waste products and packaging wherever possible.
Impact: Johnson Tiles recycles 12,000 tonnes of ceramic waste per annum. We estimate recycling
this waste saves 16,800m
3
at landill, and an estimated 235,000 miles of HGV journeys per year.
Ifsimilar measures were introduced across all divisions this could materially reduce emissions
andcost across the organisation.
Packaging accounts for c.5% of waste generated by Norcros. We aim to reduce the environmental
impact of our packaging through reducing packaging in absolute terms, using more recycled
content and eliminating single use plastics. For example, Croydex has eliminated all polystyrene
from packaging for UK and EU markets in 2022 with all packing materials now recyclable. Recent
acquisition Grant Westield recycles 99% of post-production waste into biomass materials and
other products.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
TCFD REPORT CONTINUED
TCFD Category Energy Source
Green generation
Own operations
Decreased operating costs
Medium term
Likely (4)
Intermediate (5)
20
Global, all divisions
Energy used from
renewable sources
Norcros aims to reduce our reliance on third-party electricity. This offers an opportunity
tobecome less dependent on the national grid, which in South Africa has a low proportion
ofrenewable energy.
Impact: We are targeting generation of our own renewable energy through an on-site solar PPV
at Olifantsfontein. This has the potential to reduce the site’s purchased electricity by around one
third, saving 4,400 tCO
2
e annually. Our Tile Africa (35) and House of Plumbing (5) stores could
host rooftop solar arrays across the estate that would produce meaningful electricity savings. We
are also investigating purchased renewable electricity in our remaining divisions in the UK and
South Africa, which could reduce our market-based emissions to zero. In South Africa, contracting
guaranteed renewable electricity supply via long-term power purchase agreements (PPAs) is one
of the largest opportunities for the Group.
TCFD Category Resource Eficiency
Transportation
Own operations/
Upstream/Downstream
Decreased costs
Near/Medium term
Likely (4)
Low (4)
16
Global, all divisions
Scope 1 and 3 (Upstream
and Downstream
Transportation and
Distribution)
Decarbonisation of our distribution and depot leets would help to reduce scope 1 emissions.
Thismay require transitional investment and further technological development, especially for zero
emissions HGVs.
Impact: Various divisions have plans to make their leets more sustainable. Abode has a target
to ensure all company cars will be hybrid by 2025. Triton forklift trucks are already electric, with
lithium ion batteries and the division is now in the process of electriication of the service engineer
leet. We also expect our third party logistic suppliers to move away from ICE to EVs thus reducing
our Scope 3 upstream & downstream transportation and distribution emissions, although we
expect the bulk of this reduction in the medium term. We are reliant on global trends in this area
and our transition plan to 2040 includes a reduction in the carbon intensity of inbound and
outbound freight.
Metrics and targets
Our full carbon footprint is reported in alignment with the Greenhouse Gas Protocol on pages 58 and 59. In addition, we report on our
emissions intensity, total consumption of electricity, renewable electricity, gas and water, and treatment of waste; see pages 58 to 63.
We continue to monitor our climate exposures and action plans through our risk management framework and governance structure.
Our main climate-related objectives are monitored through our ESG MI Framework through the year and reported to and reviewed by
the Board.
This year, we have set science-based targets. These targets have yet to be validated by SBTi, but they reafirm our long-term commitment
to net zero across the value chain by 2040 and introduce ambitious interim targets for 2028. Our Group targets include speciic targets
for each business unit. For further details on our climate targets and Net Zero Transition Plan, see pages 60 to 63.
Strategic report
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT
Shareholder support for our
strategy is essential for the Group’s
long-term success.
Why and how we engage:
• We aim to provide a transparent,
clear, consistent message on
both our performance and our
plans to create value, across our
communication channels.
• We engage to ensure the Group
responds to the changing needs
and interests of shareholders
and to ensure our strategy
remains relevant.
• We engage through investor
roadshows and give our
shareholders the opportunity
for contact with our Board on a
regular basis.
Outcomes of our
engagementinclude:
• The formulation of our Directors’
remuneration policy.
• Engagement with our shareholders
has inluenced our acquisition,
capital investment and progressive,
albeit prudent, dividend policy.
• The acquisition of the Grant
Westield business was partly
funded through equity, the demand
for which was extremely strong,
demonstrating support for the
Group’s strategy.
Engaging with our stakeholders.
Shareholders
Statement by the Directors in relation to their statutory duty in accordance with Section 172(1) of the
Companies Act 2006.
Section 172 statement
The Board of Directors of Norcros plc consider that they, both
individually and collectively, have acted in a way that would be most
likely to promote the success of the Company for the beneit of
its members as a whole (having regard to the stakeholders and
matters set out in Section 172(1) (a–f) of the Companies Act 2006) in
the decisions they have taken during the year ended 31March 2023.
In making this statement the Directors have had regard to the
longer-term consideration of stakeholders and the environment
and have taken into account the following:
a) the likely consequences of any decisions in the long term;
b) the interests of the Company’s employees;
c) the need to foster the Company’s business relationships
withsuppliers, customers and others;
d) the impact of the Company’s operations on the community
and the environment;
e) the desirability of the Company maintaining a reputation
forhigh standards of business conduct; and
f) the need to act fairly as between members of the Company.
The Board’s understanding of the interests of the Company’s
stakeholders is informed by the programme of stakeholder
engagement detailed below. Section 172 considerations are
embedded in decision making at Board level and throughout the
Group. The Directors fulil their duties by ensuring that there is
a strong governance structure and process running through all
aspects of the Group’s operations. The strategy for the Group has
been carefully considered by the Board in conjunction with the
Group’s Executive Management teams.
The Board dedicated time for it to consider all stakeholder
interests, primarily those of its shareholders as a whole, but also
employees, suppliers, customers and the members of the Group’s
pension schemes. All these stakeholders (amongst others) have
been impacted in different ways by the global economic and other
challenges facing the Group and the Board has had regard to this
and has formulated a number of measures to address stakeholder
interests in a balanced way.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Our commitment to customer service
remains critical to our success.
Why and how we engage:
• We engage to develop customer-
focused solutions, ensuring the
Group understands and responds
to evolving customer needs. This
helps us retain our customers and
attract new ones.
• We also engage with customers
to understand the environmental
challenges they face.
• We engage through our
experienced customer service
teams, engaging with customers on
a daily basis and regular monitoring
of performance against service level
agreements and quality standards.
Outcomes of our
engagementinclude:
• The Group proactively invested
into inventory to protect our
service and stock availability in
light of exceptional supply chain
challenges.
• New product launches in response
to customer needs.
• Obtaining accreditations such as
WRAS approval so that our hot
water taps can be used in new
build markets.
Customers
The Board continues to regard our
employees as our most valuable
asset. The Group’s strategy and
business model are underpinned
bythe commitment and efforts
ofallouremployees.
Why and how we engage:
• We engage to ensure that all
employees are valued and are given
the opportunity to provide feedback
and participate in shaping the
development of the Group.
• This helps us underpin our culture of
safety and ensures that employees
at all levels in the business play a
role in promoting and upholding a
strong focus on health and safety,
for the beneit of the Group and the
wider community.
• We engage with staff throughout
the Group through our divisional
structure. Engagement is led by
Alison Littley as the designated
Non-executive Director for
workforce engagement
(see page 52).
Outcomes of our
engagementinclude:
• The Group’s culture has been a
particular focus of the Board and is
embodied in how we endeavour to
go about our business. All members
of the Board undertake regular
site visits and receive reports and
other information to enhance their
understanding.
• Employees are encouraged to
be involved in the Company’s
performance through employee
share schemes, and other means
ofincentivisation and reward.
Employees
At Norcros, sustainability is at the
centre of our strategy. We aim to
manage our societal and environmental
impact by conducting business to
the highest standards as well as using
resources more eficiently.
Why and how we engage:
• We engage to better understand
environmental challenges and how
we can contribute to meeting them
and minimise the impact of the
Group on the environment.
• This also enables us to adhere to
relevant environmental legislation
and regulations and to ensure that
high environmental standards
are respected at each of the
Group’s sites.
• We engage with customers,
suppliers and other stakeholders
to understand the environmental
challenges they face and look for
ways to improve the eficiency
ofour businesses.
Outcomes of our
engagementinclude:
• We recognised that our
shareholders are also placing
increasing importance on
environmental issues and wanted
to understand the actions of the
Group. We developed our ESG
plan to provide an overarching
framework to the work we do.
• We have established a strong
governance structure, including
business level ESG Forums, to
coordinate our sustainability strategy.
• We carried out a full carbon
footprintassessment across scope 1,
2 and 3 emissions.
Environment
Strategic report
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
STAKEHOLDER ENGAGEMENT CONTINUED
Strategic Report
To the members of Norcros plc
The Strategic Report provides a review
of the business for the inancial year and
describes how we manage risks.
The report outlines the developments
and performance of the Group during the
inancial year and the position at the end
of the year and discusses the main trends
and factors that could affect the business
in the future.
Key performance indicators are published
to show the performance and position of
the Group. Also provided is an outline of
the Group’s vision, strategy and objectives,
along with the business model.
Our commitment to the society in
which we operate is deep. Every
Group business has programmes of
social engagement, including many
charitable activities.
Why and how we engage:
• We engage to have a positive
impact on the local communities in
which our businesses operate.
• We empower our businesses to
support local charities and initiatives
and community projects, and also
provide local employment.
• The Executive Management of the
Group supports this commitment
to our society and reviews
each business’ activities on a
monthly basis.
Outcomes of our
engagementinclude:
• Charitable activities and initiatives
across the Group.
• Our business in South Africa
launched its irst female graduate
scheme to continue the signiicant
progress towards achieving
gender equality.
• Triton, as one of the area’s largest
employers, has continued to invest
in its apprenticeship scheme giving
school leavers the opportunity to
earn as they learn.
Society
Triton continues Coventry canal
clean-up with help from local school
Triton Showers has continued its collaboration with the Canal & River Trust by
organising and holding a second “Canal Clean-up” event, which took place in
September 2022.
Joined by students and teachers from Oak Wood School, tenvolunteers from Triton
spent a day cleaning up a 1km stretch of water that runs along the side of the
manufacturer’s headquarters.
The event, which Triton has pledged to carry out at least six times each year, saw
employees support the local community by clearing the canal and surrounding area
of litter, painting over grafiti and repairing fences.
Approval
The Group Strategic Report on
pages3 to 80 of Norcros plc was
approved by the Board and signed
onits behalf by:
Thomas Willcocks
Chief Executive Oficer
14 June 2023
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Corporate governance
Croydex:Mirrors and mirrored cabinets create
the feeling of space in any size bathroom,
especially where space is at a premium.
Adding cabinets and mirrors into any bathroom
is a great way of emphasising space and light,
whilst ensuring a stylish focal point.
The Croydex collection offers plenty of variety
designed to suit rooms of different shapes and
sizes. The Flexi-Fix
™
range of wall mounted
products features a unique “X” plate which can
either be itted using existing ixing holes or
screwed to new ones. Alternatively, the patented
bracket can be glued to most surfaces, including
uneven walls or shiny tiles, eliminating the need
for drilling completely. With three ways to ix,
there’s an option for everyone.
CORPORATE
GOVERNANCE
Board of Directors
Corporate governance
Audit and Risk Committee report
Nomination Committee report
Remuneration Committee
annual statement
Directors’ remuneration
policyreport
Annual report on remuneration
Directors’ report
Statement of Directors’
responsibilities
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
BOARD OF DIRECTORS
A strong leadership team committed
todriving our strategy for growth.
Re-election of allDirectors
With the exception of David McKeith, it is proposed that each Director will seek election or re-election at the 2023 AGM. David
McKeith will not be seeking re-election at the 2023 AGM. As announced by the Company on 30 May 2023, Steve Good will be
appointed a Director on 1 July 2023 and will become Board Chair Designate from that date. Steve Good will therefore be seeking
election at the 2023 AGM. The Board is satisied that the Directors, individually and collectively, have the balance of technical
expertise, skills and experience to manage the Company’s affairs and to further the Group’s strategic objectives. In particular, each
Director has experience of growing an international business, organically, as well as by acquisition. A detailed CV for each Director,
including their particular areas of experience and expertise, is available on the Company’s website, www.norcros.com.
Thomas Willcocks
Chief Executive Oficer
James Eyre
Chief Financial Oficer
David McKeith
Acting Board Chair and
Non-executive Director
Date of appointment
Appointed to the Board in July 2013. From
January 2023, he has been Acting Board
Chair pending the appointment ofa new
Chair and will not seek re-election at
the 2023 AGM
Date of appointment
Appointed as Chief Executive Oficer
from1 April 2023
Date of appointment
Appointed Chief Financial Oficer
inAugust 2021
Length of tenure
Nine years
Length of tenure
One year
Length of tenure
Two years
Skills andexperience
David was the senior partner of the
Manchester and Liverpool ofices of
PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and served
on its UK supervisory board. He was a
non-executive and audit committee chair
of Sportech plc and the chair of the Halle
Orchestra, Manchester, and is a trustee of
Manchester Collective. David is a Fellow
of the Institute of Chartered Accountants
in England and Wales. His areas of
expertise include accounting, taxation
andprofessional services.
Skills andexperience
Previous to this appointment, Thomas has
operated as Group Business Director –
UK, with operational responsibility for the
Group’s UK business segment. He joined
Norcros South Africa as Tile Africa’s Store
Development Manager in 2006 and was
promoted in 2007 to General Manager
of Tile Africa before being appointed as
Managing Director of Norcros South Africa
in 2009. In this role, he has overseen the
sustained and proitable growth of our
South African business until taking up the
Group role in 2021. Thomas previously
worked for the Spar Group in South Africa
and the UK. He grew up in Swaziland and
was educated in South Africa where he
graduated with a Bachelor of Commerce
degree from the University of Natal.
Skills andexperience
James joined Norcros as Director of
Corporate Development and Strategy
in 2014 before being promoted to Chief
Financial Oficer in August 2021. He
began his career at Arthur Andersen and
subsequently has held a number of senior
inancial positions with Bank of Scotland,
Rothschild & Co, Bank of Ireland and,
immediately prior to joining Norcros, with
AstraZeneca. James became a trustee
of the David Lewis Centre in 2012 and
stepped down from this role in 2016. He
is a member of the Institute of Chartered
Accountants in England and Wales. James
has extensive experience in international
M&A, business development and strategy.
ANR
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
AAudit and Risk CommitteeNNomination CommitteeRRemuneration Committee
Chair of Committee
Alison Littley
Non-executive Director
Richard Collins
Company Secretary
ARN
Date of appointment
Appointed to the Board in January 2023
Date of appointment
Appointed to the Board in May 2019
Date of appointment
Joined the Company in June 2013 as
Company Secretary and Group Counsel
Length of tenure
One year
Length of tenure
Four years
Length of tenure
Ten years
Skills andexperience
Stefan was appointed a Non-executive
Director on 1 January 2023 and is
Chair (Designate) of the Audit and Risk
Committee. Stefan is chief inancial oficer
of MJGleeson plc, the Main Market listed
low cost housebuilder and land promoter,
where he has held the role since 2015. Prior
to Gleeson, Stefan held senior inance roles
at Keepmoat Ltd, Tianhe Chemicals Ltd,
The Vita Group Limited, The SkillsMarket
Ltd and Honda Motor Company.
Skills andexperience
Alison was appointed a Non-executive
Director in May 2019 and appointed
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
in July 2019. She will assume the Senior
Independent Director role in July 2023.
Alison has substantial experience in
multinational manufacturing and supply
chain operations, and a strong international
leadership background gained through a
variety of senior management positions
in Diageo plc and Mars Inc and an
agency to HM Treasury where she was
chief executive oficer. She is currently
a non-executive director at Eurocell plc,
MusicMagpie plc and Xaar plc. Alison
was formerly a non-executive director
of James Hardie Industries Plc, Headlam
Group plc, Geoffrey Osborne Group and
Weightmans LLP.
Skills andexperience
Richard is a highly experienced lawyer and
company secretary, and is a member of
the Group’s Senior Executive Committee.
He qualiied as a solicitor in 1988 and was
previously company secretary and director
of risk and compliance at Vertex Financial
Services. Prior to that, Richard was
company secretary and head of legal with
Tribal Group plc, Blick plc and Aggregate
Industries plc.
Stefan Allanson
Non-executive Director
ANR
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
David McKeith
Acting Board Chair
Chair’s introduction togovernance
For the year under review the Company has complied with
the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code save for the matters
referred to in this report. We have carried out a thorough
evaluation of Board performance, which remains satisfactory.
As is set out in the Board Chair’s Statement on page 12, there
were changes to the Board during the year; for the year under
review its composition was as follows:
Board of Directors
The Board is committed to ensuring that high standards of
corporate governance are maintained by Norcros plc and is
accountable to the Company’s shareholders for good corporate
governance. Its policy is to manage the affairs of the Company in
accordance with the principles of the UK Corporate Governance
Code referred to in the Listing Rules of the UK Listing Authority.
For the year under review, the Company has complied with the UK
Corporate Governance Code as revised in 2018 (the Code) in all
respects save for the following matters concerning David McKeith
arising from the illness and tragic death of Gary Kennedy:
• David has been Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee while also
acting as Board Chair. He will cease to chair and be a member of
the Audit and Risk Committee when Stefan Allanson becomes
Chair of that Committee at the conclusion of the 2023 AGM; and
• David was appointed as a Director in July 2013. His directorship
therefore exceeds 9 years. It was intended that he would step
down from the Board after the 2022 AGM as soon as a new Chair
of the Audit and Risk Committee had been appointed, but David
stayed on as aDirector for the reasons given above. David will
not seek re-election at the 2023 AGM.
A copy of the Code is publicly available from www.frc.org.uk. The
following sections of this statement describe the Board’s approach
to corporate governance and how the principles of the Code are
applied. These sections refer to the year ended 31 March 2023,
unless otherwise stated.
Board balance and independence
The Board normally comprises the Non-executive Chair, two
Non-executive Directors and two Executive Directors, and all
Directors are equally responsible for the proper stewardship and
leadership of the Company. The Directors holding ofice at the
date of this report and their biographical details are given on
pages 82 and 83. It should be noted that from 24 January 2023,
David McKeith was acting as Board Chair, which was a transitional
arrangement whilst a Board Chair was being recruited. Stefan
Allanson joined the Board on 1 January 2023 as a Non-executive
Director and Chair (Designate) of the Audit and Risk Committee.
Taking into account the provisions of the Code, the Chair and
all the Non-executive Directors are considered by the Board
to be independent of the Company’s Executive Management
and free from any business or other relationship that could
materially interfere with the exercise of their independent
judgement. The terms and conditions of appointment of the
Board Chair and the Non-executive Directors are available for
inspection at the registered ofice of the Company. The letters
of appointment set out the expected time commitment. Other
signiicant commitments of the Chair and Non-executive Directors
are disclosed to the Board on a regular basis throughout the
year. TheBoard was satisied that the Chair’s other signiicant
commitments did not prevent him from devoting suficient time
tothe Company throughout the year under review.
Breakdown of Executive and Non-executive Directors
Non-executive Chair 1
Non-executive Directors 2
Executive Directors 2
Note: Gary Kennedy was incapacitated
due to ill health from 23 January 2023
and passed away on 13 February 2023.
From 24 January 2023, David McKeith
(a Non-executive Director) was Acting
Board Chair.
Committed to ensuring high standards
ofcorporate governance.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Audit and Risk Committee
David McKeith (C)
Stefan Allanson (Committee Chair
(Designate) from 1 January 2023)
Alison Littley
Remuneration Committee
Alison Littley (C)
David McKeith
Gary Kennedy (served on
Committeeuntil 13 February 2023)
Stefan Allanson (from 1 January 2023)
Nomination Committee
Gary Kennedy (C)
(Chairuntil23January 2023, served
on Committee until 13 February 2023)
David McKeith (Acting
Chairfrom24January 2023)
Alison Littley
Stefan Allanson (from 1 January 2023)
The Board
David McKeith (Acting Board Chair from 24 January 2023)
Gary Kennedy (Chair until 23 January 2023, passed away on 13 February 2023)
Governance structure
David McKeith is the Senior Independent Non-executive Director.
He is available to shareholders if they have any issues or concerns
which contact through the normal channels of Board Chair, Group
Chief Executive or Chief Financial Oficer has failed to address or
resolve, or for which such contact is inappropriate. While acting
as Board Chair, he has temporarily combined this role with being
Senior Independent Non-executive Director. As was announced by
the Company on 30 May 2023, in anticipation of David McKeith’s
retirement from the Board, Alison Littley will from 1 July 2023
assume the role of Senior Independent Non-executive Director.
The Board notes that David McKeith was appointed to the Board
in July 2013 and that in accordance with the Code he ceased
to be regarded as independent on the ninth anniversary of his
appointment. Notwithstanding this, the Board regards Mr McKeith
as independent in his approach and in the performance of his
responsibilities. As the appointment of a new Board Chair has now
been announced, David will not seek re-election at the 2023 AGM.
In keeping with the Board’s succession plan, Mr McKeith will step
down from the Board at the Company’s 2023 AGM following the
appointment of Stefan Allanson on 1 January 2023 and Steve Good
from 1 July 2023.
All Directors are supplied, in a timely manner, with all relevant
documentation and inancial information to assist them in the
discharge of their duties by the making of well-informed decisions
that are in the best interests of the Company as a whole. The Board
regularly reviews the management and inancial performance
of the Company, as well as long-term strategic planning and risk
assessment. Regular reports are given to the Board on matters
such as pensions, health and safety, and litigation.
Any concerns that a Director may have about how the Group is
being run or about a course of action being proposed by the Board
will, if they cannot be resolved once those concerns have been
brought to the attention of the other Directors and the Board Chair,
be recorded in the Board minutes. In the event of the resignation
of a Non-executive Director, that Director is encouraged to send a
written statement setting out the reasons for the resignation to the
Chair who will then circulate it to the other members of the Board
and the Company Secretary.
Board Chair and Chief Executive Oficer
The positions of Chair and Chief Executive Oficer are held by
separate individuals and the Board has clearly deined their
responsibilities. The Chair is primarily responsible for the effective
working of the Board, ensuring that each Director, particularly the
Non-executive Directors, is able to make an effective contribution.
The Chief Executive Oficer has responsibility for running the
Group’s businesses and for the implementation of the Board’s
strategy, policies and decisions.
Board, Committee and Director evaluation
The performance of the Board is appraised by the Chair. The
Executive and Non-executive Directors are evaluated individually
by the Chair. The Board, led by the Senior Independent
Non-executive Director, appraises the Chair, and the Board
evaluates the performance of its three Committees. Evaluation
processes are conducted periodically and they are organised
to it in with Board priorities and succession planning activity.
Aformal evaluation took place in respect of the year under review
in accordance with the requirements of the Code. This evaluation
was conducted by means of detailed questionnaires, the results
of which were then considered as appropriate, combined with
meetings and discussions. The Chair is responsible for the review
of each Director’s development and ongoing training requirements
to ensure that the performance of each Director continues to
be effective. The overall results of the evaluation process were
satisfactory, and the outcomes of it indicated the following areas
offocus for the Board and its Committees going forward:
• succession planning;
• continuing development of remuneration policy; and
• promotion of diversity.
Advice for Directors
Procedures have been adopted for the Directors to obtain access
through the Company Secretary to independent professional
advice at the Company’s expense, where that Director judges it
necessary in order to discharge their responsibilities as a Director
of the Company.
All Directors have access to the advice and services of the
Company Secretary, who is responsible to the Board for ensuring
that Board policies and procedures are complied with. Both the
appointment and removal of the Company Secretary are matters
reserved for decision by the Board.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE CONTINUED
Board procedures
The Board has a formal schedule of matters speciically reserved
to it for decision which it reviews periodically. This ensures the
Board makes all major strategy, policy and investment decisions
affecting the Company. In addition, it is responsible for business
planning and risk management policies and the development of
policies for areas such as safety, health and environmental policies,
Directors’ and senior managers’ remuneration and ethical issues.
The Board provides direction to the management of the Company,
and it is ultimately accountable for the performance of the Group.
The Board operates in such a way as to ensure that all decisions
are made by the most appropriate people in a timely manner
that will not unnecessarily delay progress. The Board has formally
delegated speciic responsibilities to Board Committees,
namely the Nomination Committee, Audit and Risk Committee
and Remuneration Committee. The Terms of Reference of
those Committees are published on the Company’s website at
www.norcros.com.
The report of the Nomination Committee is on page 93, the report
of the Audit and Risk Committee is on pages 88 to 92 and the
report of the Remuneration Committee is on pages 94 to 113.
The Board will also appoint Committees to approve speciic
processes as deemed necessary, such as aspects of corporate
transactions, or to authorise share option administrative actions.
The directors and management teams of each Group company
are responsible for those business entities. They are tasked with
the delivery of targets approved by the Board on budgets, strategy
and policy.
Directors’ roles
The Executive Directors work solely for the Group. However, in
appropriate circumstances, Executive Directors are encouraged to
take on one non-executive directorship in another non-competing
company or organisation. The Chief Executive Oficer and the
Chief Financial Oficer have no non-executive directorships.
The terms and conditions of appointment of the Non-executive
Directors are available upon written request from the Company.
All the Non-executive Directors conirm that they have suficient
time to meet the requirements of their role. They also conirm to
disclose to the Company their other commitments and to give an
indication of the time involved in each such commitment.
The annual evaluation process includes an assessment of whether
the Non-executive Director is spending enough time to fulil their
duties. If a Non-executive Director is offered an appointment
elsewhere, the Board Chair is informed before any such offer is
accepted and the Chair will subsequently inform the Board.
The Board has suitable procedures in place for ensuring that its
powers to authorise conlict situations are operated effectively.
Such powers are operated in accordance with the Company’s
Articles of Association by means of each Director having a
responsibility to notify the Board of any conlict situation and for
the Board to deal with that situation as appropriate.
The Board ensures that all new Directors (including Non-executive
Directors) will receive a full, formal and tailored induction on joining
the Company. As part of that induction procedure, the Chair will
ensure that major shareholders have the opportunity to meet a
new Non-executive Director. The Chair also periodically assesses
the training and development needs of all Directors and ensures
that any suitable training and updates are provided to Directors.
Retirement by rotation
Each of the Directors is subject to election by shareholders at the
irst Annual General Meeting after their appointment. Thereafter,
in accordance with the Company’s Articles of Association, all of
the Directors are subject to retirement by rotation such that one
third of the Directors retire from the Board each year and each
Director must seek re-election at intervals of no more than three
years. However, the Board has decided that every Director should,
where appropriate, offer themselves for re-election at each Annual
General Meeting. Accordingly, each continuing Director will seek
re-election at the next Annual General Meeting. Biographical
details of all of the Directors are set out on pages 82 and 83, where
there is also a statement on the Directors’ suitability for re-election.
Financial reporting
When releasing the annual and interim inancial statements the
Directors aim to present a fair, balanced and understandable
assessment of the Group’s results and prospects. The Directors
have a collective responsibility for the preparation of the Annual
Report and Accounts which is more fully explained in the
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities on page 117.
Attendance by individual Directors at meetings
oftheBoard and itsCommittees
The attendance of Directors at the Board and principal Board
Committee meetings during the year is detailed in the table below:
Main
Board
meetings
Audit and Risk
Committee
meetings
Remuneration
Committee
meetings
Nomination
Committee
meetings
Gary Kennedy, Chair
////
David McKeith
////
Alison Littley////
Stefan Allanson
///—
Nick Kelsall/———
James Eyre/———
1 Gary Kennedy was incapacitated due to ill health from 23 January 2023 and passed
away on 13 February 2023. He attended all Board and Committee meetings that he was
able to attend.
2 David McKeith acted as Board Chair from 24 January 2023.
3 Stefan Allanson was appointed on 1 January 2023. He attended all Board
andCommittee meetings held after this date.
Relations with shareholders
The Company recognises the importance of maintaining good
communications with shareholders. The Company actively
engages with shareholders on speciic matters and takes a
number of other steps to ensure that the Board and, in particular,
the Non-executive Directors develop an understanding of the
views of major shareholders about the Company. Directors have
regular meetings with the Company’s major shareholders and
received regular feedback on the views of those shareholders
through the Company’s broker. Reports of these meetings, and
any shareholder communications during the year, are given to
the Board. In addition, the Company publishes any signiicant
events affecting the Group and updates on current trading. The
Board Chair and the Non-executive Directors are also offered the
opportunity to attend meetings with major shareholders and the
Non-executive Directors, and in particular the Senior Independent
Director, would attend such meetings if requested to do so by any
major shareholder.
The Board regularly receives copies of analysts’ and brokers’
brieings. The Annual and Interim Reports, together with all
announcements issued to the London Stock Exchange, are
published on the Company’s website at www.norcros.com.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
The Notice of the Annual General Meeting is sent to shareholders
at least 20 working days before the meeting. It is the Company’s
practice to propose separate resolutions on each substantially
separate issue.
For each resolution, proxy appointment forms should provide
shareholders with the option to direct their proxy to vote either for
or against the resolution or to withhold their vote. The Company
ensures that all valid proxy appointments received for general
meetings are properly recorded and counted. For each resolution
the Company ensures that the following information is given at the
meeting and made available as soon as reasonably practicable on
a website which is maintained by or on behalf of the Company:
• the date of the meeting;
• the text of the resolution;
• the number of votes validly cast;
• the proportion of the Company’s issued share capital
represented by those votes;
• the number of votes cast in favour of the resolution;
• the number of votes against the resolution; and
• the number of shares in respect of which the vote was withheld.
The Board Chair seeks to arrange for the Chairs of the Audit and
Risk, Remuneration and Nomination Committees (or a deputy if
any of them is unavoidably absent) to be available at the Annual
General Meeting to answer any questions relating to the work of
these Committees.
Accountability and audit
The respective responsibilities of the Directors and auditor in
connection with the inancial statements are explained in the
Statement of Directors’ Responsibilities on page 117 and the
Auditor’s Report on pages 119 to 124. The Directors ensure the
independence of the auditor by requesting annual conirmation of
independence which includes the disclosure of all non-audit fees.
Risk management and internal control
The Board is responsible for the Group’s system of internal control
and for reviewing its effectiveness (covering all material controls
including inancial, operational, risk management and compliance).
This is undertaken via an annual programme to review the internal
control environment at each business unit. Each review is carried
out by the Group Head of Internal Audit and Risk Assurance, who is
independent of that business unit. The results of these reviews are
communicated to the Audit and Risk Committee.
The Board has carried out a robust assessment in order to identify
and evaluate what it considers to be the principal risks faced by the
Group and has also assessed the adequacy of the actions taken to
manage these risks. This process has been in place for the period
under review and up to the date of the approval of the Annual Report
and Accounts. The principal risks are disclosed on pages 40 to 44.
The Group’s insurance continues to be managed and co-ordinated
centrally with the assistance of insurance brokers. This gives
the Group full visibility of both claims history and the insurance
industry’s perception of the Group’s overall risk via the respective
insurance premiums. The Company examines the size and trend
of these premiums and the extent to which it can mitigate the risk
and reduce the overall risk burden in the business by considering
the appropriate level of insurance deductible and the potential
beneit of self-insurance in some areas.
Viability
In accordance with the Code, the Board has assessed the
prospects of the Company, using a three-year assessment
timescale, and concluded that there is a reasonable expectation
that the Company will be able to meet its liabilities and continue in
operation. The full Viability Statement is contained on page 45.
Operational structure, review and compliance
In addition to the Chief Financial Oficer, the Group has Senior
Financial Managers at its Head Ofice. The current Group Head
of Internal Audit and Risk Assurance was appointed in March
2020 and he is responsible for the Internal Audit and Risk
Assurance function for the Group. Further information on the
work of this function is in the Audit and Risk Committee Report on
pages 88 to 92.
The key elements of the controls framework within which the
Group operates are:
• an organisational structure with clearly deined lines
of responsibility, delegation of authority and reporting
requirements;
• an embedded culture of openness of communication between
operational management and the Company’s Executive
Management on matters relating to risk and control;
• deined expenditure authorisation levels; and
• a comprehensive system of inancial reporting. An annual
budget for each business unit is prepared in detail and approved
by the Group Executive Management. The Board approves the
overall Group’s budget and plans. Monthly actual results are
reported against budget and the prior year and the forecast for
the year is revised where necessary. Any signiicant changes
and adverse variances are reviewed by the Board and remedial
action is taken where appropriate. There is weekly cash and
treasury reporting to the Chief Financial Oficer and periodic
reporting to the Board on the Group’s tax and treasury position.
The system of internal control is designed to manage rather than
eliminate the risk of failing to achieve business objectives and
can only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against
material misstatement or loss. It is tested and developed as
appropriate by the Group Head of Internal Audit and Risk Assurance
working in conjunction with the Audit and Risk Committee.
The control framework as outlined above gives reasonable
assurance that the structure of controls in operation is appropriate
to the Group’s situation and that risk is kept to acceptable levels
throughout the Group.
Takeover directive
Share capital structures are included in the Directors’ Report on
pages 114 to 116.
Approved by the Board of Directors on 14 June 2023 and signed
onits behalf by:
David McKeith
Acting Board Chair
14 June 2023
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT
David McKeith
Chair of the Audit
andRiskCommittee
During the year, the Committee continued to focus on
oversight and monitoring of key risks and risk management
policies and procedures.
Role of the Audit and RiskCommittee
The main responsibilities of the Audit and Risk Committee are:
• reviewing the Company’s inancial reporting;
• monitoring the Company’s risk management and internal
control procedures;
• overseeing the appointment and work of the external auditor;
• overseeing the work of the Internal Audit and Risk Assurance
function; and
• advising the Board on whether the Annual Report
andAccounts are fair, balanced and understandable.
Responsibilities
The Committee’s Terms of Reference are in compliance with the
UK Corporate Governance Code 2018 and provide full details
of its role and responsibilities. A copy can be obtained from the
Company’s website, www.norcros.com.
The Committee is a sub-committee of the Board whose main
responsibilities include:
• monitoring the integrity of the inancial statements of the
Company and any formal announcements relating to the
Company’s inancial performance, and reviewing signiicant
inancial reporting judgements contained in them;
• providing advice (where requested by the Board) on whether
the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair,
balanced and understandable, and provides the information
necessary for shareholders to assess the Company’s position
and performance, business model and strategy;
• reviewing the Company’s internal inancial controls and internal
control and risk management systems;
• monitoring and reviewing the effectiveness of the Company’s
Internal Audit and Risk Assurance function;
• at the appropriate time, conducting the tender process and
making recommendations to the Board about the appointment,
re-appointment and removal of the external auditor, and
approving the remuneration and terms of engagement of the
external auditor;
• reviewing and monitoring the external auditor’s independence
and objectivity;
• reviewing the effectiveness of the external audit process,
takinginto consideration relevant UK professional and
regulatoryrequirements;
• developing and implementing policy on the engagement of the
external auditor to supply non-audit services, ensuring there is
prior approval of non-audit services, considering the impact this
may have on independence, taking into account the relevant
regulations and ethical guidance in this regard, and reporting
tothe Board on any improvement or action required; and
• reporting to the Board on how it has discharged its responsibilities.
Monitoring the Company’s
reporting and risk management.
Members
During the year to 31 March 2023, the Committee has consisted
of David McKeith and Alison Littley, with Stefan Allanson joining
the Board as Chair (Designate) of the Audit and Risk Committee on
1January 2023 and he will become Chair of the Committee at the
conclusion of the 2023 AGM. On 24 January 2023, DavidMcKeith
assumed the role of Acting Board Chair. Biographies of all
members of the Committee appear on pages 82 and 83.
The Chair of the Committee, David McKeith, is considered to have
recent and relevant inancial experience as he is a fellow of the
Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales and a
former senior partner of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. He also
acted as chair of the audit committee for Sportech plc, where he
was a non-executive director until he resigned from that position
inAugust 2016.
The Board is satisied that the Committee has the appropriate
level of expertise to fulil its Terms of Reference. The Committee
reviewed its own Terms of Reference, performance and
constitution during the year.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Signiicant inancial reporting matters in the 2023
Annual Report
The signiicant inancial reporting matters that the Committee
considered in the year are detailed below:
Going Concern and Viability Statement
The Group has prepared a Going Concern and Viability Statement
relecting the potential impact of principal risks and uncertainties,
including a situation similar in nature to the COVID-19 pandemic,
on liquidity and solvency. This has been performed by modelling a
reasonable worst-case scenario and then applying a reverse stress
test on the Group’s current forecasts. Further details are included
on page 45 and on page 130.
The Committee, alongside the Board, has reviewed and
considered the detailed forecast scenarios and agrees with
management’s conclusions.
Deined beneit pension scheme liabilities
The Group’s UK deined beneit pension scheme is signiicant both
in terms of its context in the overall Balance Sheet and the results
of the Group. The Group’s UK deined beneit pension scheme (as
calculated under IAS 19R) shows a surplus of £14.9m at 31 March
2023 from a surplus position of £19.6m at 31 March 2022.
The valuation of the present value of scheme liabilities involves
signiicant judgement and expertise particularly in respect of the
assumptions used. In order to value the liabilities, management has
engaged an independent irm of qualiied actuaries, Isio (formerly
KPMG Pensions). The Committee reviewed the outputs from this
work and benchmarked the assumptions, particularly the net
discount rate, with those applied by other companies with deined
beneit pension schemes with similar characteristics and having
the same measurement date. The Committee concurred with the
assumptions put forward by management to value the liabilities.
The Committee considered the approach and judgement taken
by management in determining the value of the surplus and
concurred with management’s view.
Acquisition accounting
As part of its consideration of how the Group has accounted
for the acquisition of Grant Westield, the Committee reviewed
management’s assessment of Grant Westield’s intangible assets.
The Committee has experience of reviewing intangible assets
following the acquisitions of Vado in 2013, Croydex in 2015,
Abode in 2016, Merlyn in 2017 and House of Plumbing in 2019.
The Committee reviewed a paper prepared by management
and challenged the assumptions used, the nature of the assets
identiied and the proposed useful lives of each asset, and agreed
to recognise intangible assets in respect of Grant Westield’s
customer relationships and brand valued at £35.5m.
In conducting these reviews, the Committee considered the
work and recommendations of the Company’s inance function
and received reports from the Company’s external auditor on
its indings.
Restructuring at Norcros Adhesives and impairment
atJohnsonTiles UK
The Group recognised a restructuring provision in relation to the
closure of Norcros Adhesives of £4.8m relecting the impairment
of assets and costs associated with closure. The Group also
recognised a non-cash impairment of the carrying value of assets
at Johnson Tiles UK of £5.0m following a review of future cash
lows based on uncertain demand.
The Committee considered the approach and judgements taken
by management in determining the value of the provisions and
concurred with management’s view.
Fair, balanced and understandable
The Committee formally reviews the Company’s annual and
interim inancial statements and associated announcements,
and considers signiicant accounting principles, policies and
practices and their appropriateness, inancial reporting issues and
signiicant judgements made, including those summarised above.
The Committee also advises the Board on whether it considers
that the Annual Report and Accounts, taken as a whole, is fair,
balanced and understandable, and provides the necessary
information for shareholders to assess the Company’s inancial
position and performance, strategy and business model.
The Committee concluded that these disclosures, and the
processes and controls underlying their production, meet the
latest legal and regulatory requirements for a listed company
and that the 31 March 2023 Annual Report and Accounts are fair,
balanced and understandable.
Meetings of the Committee
The Committee met formally three times during the year ended
31 March 2023. By invitation, the Board Chair, Chief Executive
Oficer, Chief Financial Oficer, Company Secretary, Group
Head of Internal Audit and Risk Assurance and Group Financial
Controller also attended each of these meetings together with the
engagement partner and other members of the audit team from
the external auditor.
The Committee may invite other individuals either from within the
Company or external technical advisers to attend meetings to
provide information or advice as it sees it.
At each meeting the Committee had the opportunity to discuss
matters with the external and internal auditor without management
being present. The Chair of the Committee also has regular
discussions with the external audit partner outside of the formal
Committee process, and he met with the Group Head of Internal
Audit and Risk Assurance without management being present.
At each of its meetings the Committee reviews any inancial
communications issued to the market.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED
Principal activities of the Audit and Risk Committee during the year
A wide variety of issues were addressed in the year; they are summarised in the table below:
AreaActivities
Financial reportingReview of the Company’s trading updates and other inancial communications
Review of the Company’s interim results for the six months ended 30 September 2022
Review of the Company’s Annual Report and Accounts for the year ended 31 March 2023, including
consideration of:
• signiicant inancial reporting matters;
• whether the Annual Report and Accounts are fair, balanced and understandable; and
• the requirements of the going concern assessment and Viability Statement
Review of changes to corporate reporting requirements
Review of the restructuring provision at Norcros Adhesives
Review of the impairment of assets at Johnson Tiles UK
Review of the acquisition accounting for Grant Westield
External auditReview of the external auditor’s proposed audit work plan for the year ended 31 March 2023, including its
assessment of the principal inancial reporting risks
Review of the external auditor’s terms of engagement and proposed fees
Assessment of the external auditor’s independence, objectivity, qualiications and expertise, including a review
ofits internal quality control checks
Review of the indings from the external audit for the year ended 31 March 2023
Internal auditReview of the internal audit work programme for 2022/23
Approval of the annual internal audit programme for 2023/24
Review of current internal audit resource levels
Assessment of the work carried out to test and review internal controls and cyber security, together with the status
of recommendations made and actions agreed
Review of indings and agreed actions arising from internal audit assignments
ComplianceReview of the whistleblowing log
Review of the fraud and attempted fraud log
Review of the data protection log including data incidents, data subject access requests, etc.
Risk managementReview of the Group’s reported principal risks and uncertainties including consideration of any new or emerging
risks and uncertainties identiied and amendment of current principal risks as required
Review of the actions taken by the Group to manage its principal risks particularly those arising from cyber
security and ESG risks such as climate change
GovernanceConducted an appraisal of the performance of the Committee
Review of the Group’s policy in respect of the employment of former employees of the external auditor
Review of the Group’s policy in respect of the engagement of the external auditor for non-audit services
andnon-audit services provided by the external auditor during the year
Review of the Committee’s Terms of Reference and constitution in line with current best practice
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Internal audit framework
The Group has a dedicated Group-wide Internal Audit and Risk
Assurance function that is led by an experienced Group Head of
Internal Audit and Risk Assurance. This role is supported by a small
dedicated internal audit team based in South Africa focused on
the particular risks faced by the Group’s retail and manufacturing
operations in South Africa. Internal audit resources are kept under
constant review to ensure an appropriate level of independent
assurance is obtained by the Committee.
The Group operates a rolling twelve-month audit plan prepared
by the Group Head of Internal Audit and Risk Assurance. The
plan is risk based using assessments carried out by the Group,
includes senior management input, and is reviewed and
approved by the Committee. At each meeting, the Committee
considers the results of the audits undertaken during the
preceding period and the adequacy of management’s response
to matters raised. Additionally, the related mitigations against
issues and actions raised from these audits are systematically
followed up in subsequent Committee meetings until they are
adequatelyresolved.
The Group control and risk self-assessment questionnaires, which
are completed annually by each business unit, are reviewed by the
Group Head of Internal Audit and Risk Assurance and the Group
Financial Controller. This includes a management representation
requiring each division to conirm that it has applied and followed
all required policies and procedures in the year. Key control issues
that arise from this review are raised with the Committee, with
the results of this assessment also feeding into the audit plan
andindividual audit engagements.
Group Internal Audit and Risk Assurance activities
during the year
The Group Internal Audit and Risk Assurance team provided
assurance across a wide range of risks during the year, in line
with the standards set out in the approved audit charter. The
annual audit plan, which is approved by the Committee, included
business reviews of operational units, assessing the effectiveness
of key internal controls in place over selected systems and
processes, which this year included Group Occupational Health &
Safety Management and Group Payroll systems at all locations. In
South Africa (SA), the primary focus was on the controls in place
at retail outlets with completion of a cycle of operational reviews
across all stores. The plan also included operational reviews of
three distribution centres and it covered SA Head Ofice inancial
and other risk-based reviews in line with the Group audits noted
above. Actions agreed during previous audit visits were reviewed
to conirm management’s progress.
Other key activities of the function during the year included
oversight of the Group’s online awareness training programme,
which covers an expansive range of topics including anti-bribery
and corruption, information security, data protection, cyber
security and modern slavery, along with a range of health and
safety and soft skills training courses. The team also liaises closely
with our insurers on a range of risk management projects including
cyber security and incident response, business continuity and
disaster recovery planning, and company vehicle driver licence
checking and driver behavioural training.
Internal Audit also facilitates the annual control and risk self-
assessment process covering inancial and information security
controls and, through audit reviews, it provides independent
assurance that the controls declared by management are in place
and operating effectively.
Summaries of all indings and actions, and updates on all audit
work and other key activities, are provided at each Audit and Risk
Committee meeting.
Risk management framework
Our risk management framework is highlighted on page 39 of our
Strategic Report. The Audit and Risk Committee’s role in the risk
management framework can be summarised as:
1. review of current and future (emerging) risk through the
discussion of risk and mitigating actions with divisional
management in annual strategic reviews;
2. annual review of the risk management reporting process and
associated outputs to ensure they are robust and effective and
include strategic and operational risks that could threaten the
business model and future strategy; and
3. review of the Annual Report to ensure that it is a fair relection
of risk assessments undertaken.
Internal control and risk management review
The Board has overall responsibility for the Group’s system
of internal control and risk management and for reviewing its
effectiveness. The internal control systems are designed to meet
the needs of the Group and to manage rather than eliminate the
risk of failure to achieve business objectives. Such systems can
only provide reasonable and not absolute assurance against
material misstatement or loss.
The Committee undertakes a review, at least annually, of the
effectiveness of the Company’s system of internal controls
and risk management and the Board will take into account the
Committee’s Report, conclusions and recommendations in this
regard. The Board conirms that it has reviewed the effectiveness
of the internal control system, including inancial, operational and
compliance controls and risk management in accordance with the
UK Corporate Governance Code, for the period from 1 April 2022
to the date of approval of the Annual Report and Accounts for the
year ended 31 March 2023.
Fraud and whistleblowing
The Group maintains a whistleblowing policy and engages two
independent conidential whistleblowing service providers,
one covering South Africa speciically and the other covering
all other locations. Reports on the use of these services, any
signiicant concerns that have been raised, details of investigations
carried out and any actions arising as a result are reported to the
Committee at each meeting.
The Committee also receives papers on incidents of fraud or
attempted fraud and reviews them at each meeting. At least
annually, the Committee conducts an assessment of the
adequacy of the Group’s procedures in respect of compliance,
whistleblowing and fraud.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
AUDIT AND RISK COMMITTEE REPORT CONTINUED
External auditor
The Committee has primary responsibility for making
recommendations to the Board on the appointment,
re-appointment and removal of the external auditor. The
Committee keeps under review the scope and results of the audit
and its effectiveness, as well as the independence and objectivity
of the auditor.
The Committee is aware of the need to safeguard the auditor’s
objectivity and independence and the issue is discussed by the
Committee and periodically with the audit engagement partner
from BDO LLP. In accordance with Auditing Practices Board
requirements, external auditor independence is maintained by the
rotation of the engagement partner every ive years. The current
audit engagement partner, Gary Harding, was appointed following
the change of auditor in 2020.
Policies on the award of non-audit work to the external auditor
and the employment of ex-employees of the external auditor are
in place and reviewed annually. Additionally, the approval of the
Chair of the Committee is required prior to awarding high value
non-audit work to the external auditor, and the non-audit work
planned and performed is monitored by the Committee at each
meeting. BDO LLP assisted the Group with a response to a letter
from the Financial Reporting Council. The Financial Reporting
Council performed a limited scope review of the 2022 Annual
Report and Accounts to consider compliance with reporting
requirements. The Financial Reporting Council’s role was not to
verify the information provided and the review does not provide
any assurance that the 2022 Annual Report and Accounts is
correct in all material respects. The assistance provided by BDO
isa permissible non-audit service.
The external audit starts with the design of a work plan that
addresses the key risks of the audit which were conirmed at the
March 2023 meeting of the Committee. The Committee also
agreed the terms of engagement and the fees payable for the
engagement. At each meeting the Committee had the opportunity
to discuss matters with the external auditor without management
being present. The Chair of the Committee also has regular
discussions with the external audit partner outside the formal
Committee process.
For the year ended 31 March 2023, the Committee was satisied
with the independence, objectivity and effectiveness of the
relationship with BDO LLP as external auditor.
External audit tender and appointment of auditor
The external auditor, BDO LLP, was appointed at the 2020 AGM
inJuly 2020 following a competitive tender process.
On behalf of the Audit and Risk Committee.
David McKeith
Chair of the Audit and Risk Committee
14 June 2023
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
NOMINATION COMMITTEE REPORT
Role of the Nomination Committee
The main responsibilities of the Nomination Committee are:
• evaluating the balance of skills, knowledge, independence,
diversity and experience of the Board;
• succession planning for the Board and at senior
management level;
• determining the scope of the role of a new Director and
the skills and time commitment required and making
recommendations to the Board about illing Board
vacancies; and
• appointing additional Directors.
The Terms of Reference of the Committee are available for
inspection upon written request to the Company and on its
website at www.norcros.com.
The Nomination Committee and the Board seek to maintain an
appropriate balance between the Executive and Non-executive
Directors. The Nomination Committee is chaired by the Chair of
the Board and consists of all the Non-executive Directors. The
Board Chair will not chair the Committee when it deals with the
appointment of a successor to that role.
During the year under review, the Nomination Committee led
the process to ind a new Non-executive Director and a new
Chair. TheCommittee also dealt with the succession of the Chief
Executive Oficer given the retirement of Nick Kelsall from this role
on 31 March 2023. A thorough selection process was undertaken,
considering both internal and external candidates, leading to the
appointment of Thomas Willcocks as CEO effective 1 April 2023.
The Nomination Committee also evaluates the balance of skills,
knowledge, diversity and experience of the Board. If a new
appointment to the Board is required, the Committee will use the
appropriate selection process and will determine the scope of the
role of a new Director and the skills and time commitment required
and make recommendations to the Board about illing Board
vacancies and appointing additional Directors.
In selecting candidates due regard will be given to the balance
of the Board, and to the beneits of different backgrounds and
experience, and to diversity on the Board including gender.
Appointments will be made in accordance with the Group’s
diversity and inclusion policy, on the basis of merit and the most
appropriate experience against objective criteria in the best
interests of shareholders. The Board endeavours to ensure that
these principles are applied throughout the Group.
In the year under review the Committee has, in addition to its
routine responsibilities, continued to focus on succession planning
issues, and it is satisied that there are in place appropriate
plans for succession planning for Board members and senior
management across the Group.
David McKeith
Acting Chair of the Nomination Committee
14 June 2023
Evaluating the Board and succession
planning for a sustainable future.
David McKeith
Acting Chair of the
Nomination Committee
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ANNUAL STATEMENT 2023
Alison Littley
Chair of the
RemunerationCommittee
Role of the Remuneration Committee
The main responsibilities of the Remuneration Committee are:
• determining the remuneration policy and keeping it under
review, including consulting with, and obtaining approval
from, shareholders as appropriate;
• implementing the approved remuneration policy as regards
Executive Director remuneration, beneits and incentives,
including the setting of targets and determination of
payouts of all incentive arrangements;
• ensuring alignment of the remuneration structure for senior
executives to the Executive Directors’ remuneration policy,
including approval of changes to packages;
• keeping under review the Executive Directors’ remuneration
policy (and the approach to implementation) in the context
of pay policies and practices across the wider workforce,
and the Group’s culture; and
• preparing the Annual Report on Remuneration, to be
approved by the members of the Company at the Annual
General Meeting.
Dear shareholders,
On behalf of the Board, I am pleased to present the Directors’
Remuneration Report for the year ended 31 March 2023.
Throughout the year the Committee has continued to strive to
balance the perspectives of the Company’s stakeholders with its
obligations, as steward of the Group, to ensure remuneration is:
• it for purpose;
• competitive without being excessive;
• able to incentivise and fairly reward delivery of our short and
longer-term ambitions; and
• cascaded appropriately throughout the Group.
I hope this report clearly explains how we have sought to achieve
this aim for the year in review and the current inancial year.
Directors’ remuneration policy
A key focus for the Committee during the year has been to
review the Directors’ remuneration policy. The current policy was
approved by 96% of shareholders at the 2020 AGM, and expires
later this year. Ahead of seeking approval of a new policy at the
2023 AGM, the Committee reviewed the existing framework to
ensure it remains credible and effective, is closely aligned with
strategy and the Group’s culture and appropriately relects market
and governance best practice. We concluded that the current
policy remains broadly it for purpose for Norcros. Therefore, in
early 2023, the Committee consulted extensively with principal
shareholders on proposals to submit for approval at the 2023 AGM
a largely unchanged policy, save for two changes intended to
future-proof the policy which will not be used in the year ending
31March 2024, these being:
• increasing the Approved Performance Share Plan (APSP) award
limit, from 100% to 150% of salary for the CEO, and to 125% of
salary for the CFO. This proposal is designed to ensure there is
appropriate lexibility to upweight the emphasis in the package
on long-term performance, and/or take account of potential
increases in the scale and scope of the business, over the
term of the policy. To the extent that the additional headroom
is utilised, the Committee will at that time consider whether it
would be appropriate to make a commensurate increase to the
level of the shareholding requirement; and
• ensuring lexibility to incorporate additional measures to the
APSP, including non-inancial measures, e.g. linked to other
strategic priorities such as ESG. This lexibility will be capped
at 25% of the APSP opportunity. At the same time, it is also
proposed that similar lexibility provided for by the current policy
in relation to the annual bonus be increased from 20% to 25%
ofthe opportunity.
The Committee welcomed all feedback received through this
engagement process, the broadly supportive nature of which
informed our decision to put forward for shareholder approval
unchanged proposals for the policy. If approved, the proposed
policy will take effect from the date of the 2023 AGM, for a period
of up to three years.
Fairly rewarding contribution
tothe success of the Group.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
The performance context for remuneration in the year
As reported earlier in this Annual Report, performance highlights include:
• resilience of the Group’s business model in challenging market conditions;
• strong execution of strategy;
• full year revenue of £441.0m (2022: £396.3m), 11.3% higher than prior year on a reported basis and 1.5% higher on a constant currency
like for like basis after adjusting for Grant Westield;
• record underlying operating proit of £47.3m, 13.2% higher than prior year (2022: £41.8m); and
• the completion in the year of the acquisition of Grant Westield and its successful integration into the Group.
This performance is testament to the Group’s proven business model and leading customer service proposition, in addition
to the proactive management and the leadership of our CEO and CFO, the commitment of all of our people and the effective
successionmanagement for our executive positions.
Remuneration for the year in review
Annual bonus
Due to the continued robust performance summarised above, the operating proit targets set for the annual bonus were achieved as to
32.3%, resulting in the bonus payments detailed on page 107. In keeping with our normal practice, the Committee reviewed the formulaic
outcome in the context of alignment with the Group’s underlying performance, as well as the experience of other stakeholder groups,
noting in particular recent feedback from shareholders. The Committee’s assessment of this outcome is explained indetail below:
Aspect reviewedEvaluation by the Committee
The challenge of stretching
targets set at the start
of the year
The targets were set at the start of the inancial year (at a time of ongoing uncertainty) to span an appropriate
range of possible performance outcomes identiied in the budgeting process. The Committee reviewed the
actual outturn in the context of the assumptions underlying the budgeting process at the time, concluding
that they and therefore the targets built from them, remained representative of trading conditions
experienced over the course of the year in review
The Group’s longer-term
performance trajectory
Notwithstanding the formulaic outcome, the Committee evaluated performance in the context of this being
a record proit performance for the Group, and concluded that the formulaic payout was warranted
Shareholder experience
We continued to deliver against our stated and progressive dividend policy, and our strategy for
continuedgrowth
Employee experience
We continue to prioritise the safety, health and wellbeing of all our people. During the year in review, the
Group focused available wage inlation budgets on our lower paid colleagues to support employees through
the current inlationary environment and associated cost of living pressures
Customer experience
We maintained the highest standards of service to our customers, particularly given the global challenges
tosupply chains
In the context outlined, the Committee is satisied that the bonus
targets were challenging and that the outcomes relect the
exceptional leadership and hard work of the Executive Directors
and the wider workforce to produce these excellent results,
notwithstanding continued supply chain challenges and pressure
from cost inlation.
2020 APSP
2020 APSP awards were made in November 2020, at a time of
heightened macroeconomic uncertainty caused by the COVID-19
pandemic. To help mitigate the impact of this uncertainty on its
ability to set robust, challenging and motivational cumulative
EPS targets, the Committee resolved to calibrate the targets
attaching to the 2020 APSP on the basis of 2023 inancial year
performance only and to set a wider performance range than
has been typical practice at Norcros but lower the payment at
threshold from 25% to 0% of maximum. The EPS performance
condition for the 2020 APSP awards was achieved as to 98.9%.
The Committee has considered this formulaic outcome in the
context of the factors referred to above, and concluded that this
outcome is justiied. Accordingly, the formulaic vesting outcome
of the 2020 APSP options was approved. Whilst 2020 APSP awards
do not vest until November, the Committee is presently satisied
that no windfall gains have arisen on these awards. The award
date for this cycle was delayed until later in the year (at which time
the share price had recovered partially from its March 2020 low)
and the share price, which continues to be impacted by external
market conditions, remains below the grant date share price. The
Committee’s view on any windfall gains will be reviewed again
atthe time of vesting.
2022 APSP
Awards for the year in review were made in July 2022 and suitably
challenging EPS targets set (see page 108 for further details).
Nick Kelsall’s retirement
As announced on 30 January 2023, Nick Kelsall retired as CEO and
a Board Director on 31 March 2023. Full details of his remuneration
in relation to the year in review are set out in the Annual Report
on Remuneration. He remains an employee of the Group until
30January 2024, during which time he continues to receive salary
and contractual beneits. He is not eligible for a bonus for the
year ending 31 March 2024 and will not receive an APSP award in
2023. Nick retains interests in the Deferred Bonus Plan (DBP), which
shall vest at the normal time subject to the rules of the Plan. The
Committee resolved to treat Nick as a good leaver, recognising his
30 years’ service and valued contribution to the Group, in respect
of unvested awards under the APSP. Awards will be pro-rated for
time and shall vest on the respective normal vesting date subject
to the achievement of the relevant performance condition. He is
also subject to the post-employment shareholding requirement as
per our policy.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
REMUNERATION COMMITTEE ANNUAL STATEMENT 2023
CONTINUED
Remuneration for the year to 31 March 2024
The workforce context
The Committee’s decision making in relation to Executive
Director remuneration continues to be heavily informed by the
Group’s workforce remuneration practices and the decisions
taken by management in this regard. This year, the Committee
has been particularly mindful of the impact on the workforce
of the inlationary environment and associated cost of living
pressures. In this context, the Committee supported thedecision
by management to budget for a material cost of living increase,
of c.6% on average across the Group, and to taper this through
the organisation with the highest percentage increases being
awarded to our lowest paid colleagues. This approach is
considered to be fair and appropriately relect the prevailing
inlationary environment, and its asymmetric impact on different
organisational levels of the Group.
The Executive Directors
Thomas Willcocks was appointed CEO effective 1 April 2023, and
his salary set by the Committee at £420,000 from this date. The
Committee will keep this under review in the context of Thomas’
development and performance in the role, and will increase this
over time, by more than the workforce average if necessary, to
an appropriately competitive level commensurate with Thomas’
performance and contribution. In keeping with our normal
practice, any salary increase will be explained in the relevant
Annual Report on Remuneration.
As disclosed in last year’s report, the Committee resolved to
increase James Eyre’s base salary to £320,000 in two stages.
The irst of these stages, to £290,000, was implemented with
effect from 1 April 2022. In determining to implement the
second increase with effect from 1 April 2023, the Committee
took into account a range of factors, including James Eyre’s
continued strong performance and contribution to the Group
– particularly his invaluable support to Nick Kelsall and Thomas
Willcocks through the CEO transition – as well as the inlationary
environment (which was unforeseen at the time of agreeing the
two-stage increase). In this context, the Committee concluded that
it was appropriate to implement the second increase as originally
intended, noting that this salary level is now positioned to be
appropriately competitive for similar roles of comparable scope,
scale and complexity.
Both Executive Directors receive a pension contribution, or
allowance in lieu, of 8% of salary, in line with the employer contribution
available for the wider UK workforce. Other beneits consist of car
allowance, aligned at £15,000 for all Executive Directors for the
year ending 31 March 2024, and private medical insurance.
No changes are proposed to the annual bonus in 2024.
No changes are proposed to the APSP opportunities (100% of
salary) in 2024. The APSP will continue to be based 100% on
three-year cumulative EPS, with inal vesting also subject to an
assessment of the quality of earnings by reference to the Group’s
ROCE performance. This additional, discretionary underpin
relects shareholder feedback received during engagement on the
proposed policy, for some linkage in the APSP to returns alongside
EPS to help ensure that growth does not come at the expense of
longer-term returns. The Board of Directors supports this principle
and, in this context, introducing return on capital to the APSP
was considered by the Committee during its review of the policy.
In deciding to propose an unchanged scorecard for the 2023
APSP, which is cascaded into the Group on consistent terms to
reinforce collective behaviours that support longer-term success,
the Committee was mindful of the need to ensure that incentives
balance alignment with strategy and reinforcing performance
that is within the control of all participants. Capital allocation
decisions, M&A in particular, are taken by the Board as a whole and
are outside the control of the signiicant majority of participants.
Therefore, the Committee concluded that linking APSP outcomes
formulaically to return on capital at this time could impact a
scheme that is simple, well understood and motivational.
The Committee will keep under review its approach to
implementation of the policy in the context of wider business
performance and the stakeholder experience. We also remain
committed to setting stretching targets for the incentives, taking
into account the award opportunity when doing so to help ensure
that pay outcomes are commensurate with performance outturns.
The Board Chair
The Committee is also responsible for setting the remuneration of
the Board Chair. In doing so, it adopts a consistent set of principles
to those for executive and workforce remuneration. For the year
from 1 April 2023 the Committee has resolved to increase the
Board Chair’s fee from £145,000 p.a. to £149,350 p.a.
Concluding remarks
On behalf of the Committee, we hope that we can count on your
support for the resolutions to approve this Directors’ Remuneration
Report and the revised remuneration policy at the 2023 AGM, where I
will be available to answer any questions in relation to this report.
Alison Littley
Chair of the Remuneration Committee
14 June 2023
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT
Remuneration disclosure
This Directors’ Remuneration Report has been prepared in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006 and Schedule
8 of the Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) (Amendment) Regulations 2013. The report meets
the requirements of the UK Listing Authority’s Listing Rules and the Disclosure Guidance and Transparency Rules. In this report, we
describe how the principles of good governance relating to Directors’ remuneration, as set out in the UK Corporate Governance
Code (the Code), are applied in practice. The Remuneration Committee conirms that throughout the inancial year the Group has
complied with these governance rules and best practice provisions set out in the Code except as regards the alignment of Executive
Director pension contributions with those for the workforce as a whole. As described elsewhere in this report, Nick Kelsall volunteered
a reduction to his pension contribution to bring this in line with the UK workforce average from 1 January 2023.
Directors’ remuneration policy
This section of the report sets out the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and Non-executive Directors, which will be put to
a binding shareholder vote at the 2023 AGM. If this resolution is carried, the policy will come into effect on that date and will remain
effective for up to a three-year period ending on the date of the 2026 AGM. The policy set out in this report is unchanged from that
approved by shareholders in 2020, other than the updates that are set out below in italicised text and explained in further detail in the
Annual Statement.
Executive Director remuneration policy table
This policy has been designed to support the principal objective of enabling the Group to attract, motivate and retain the people it needs
to maximise the value of the business.
Assessment of proposed policy against the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code (the Code)
The Committee believes that the proposed policy complies with
the six pillars set out in paragraph 40 of the Code.
Clarity: The Committee believes that the disclosure of the
remuneration arrangements is transparent with clear rationale
provided on its maintenance and any changes to policy. The
Committee remains committed to consulting with shareholders
on the policy and its implementation.
Simplicity: The policy and the Committee’s approach
to implementation are simple and well understood. The
performance measures used in the incentive plans are well
aligned to the Group’s strategy.
Risk: The Committee has ensured that remuneration
arrangements do not encourage and reward excessive risk
taking by setting targets to be stretching and achievable, with
discretion to adjust formulaic bonus and APSP outcomes
retained by the Committee to ensure pay outcomes remain
aligned with performance outturns.
Predictability and proportionality: The link of the performance
measures to strategy and the setting of targets balances
predictability and proportionality by ensuring outcomes do not
reward poor performance.
Culture: The policy is consistent with the Group’s culture as well
as strategy, therefore driving behaviours that promote the long-
term success of the Company for the beneit of all stakeholders.
Component and objectiveOperationOpportunityPerformance measures
Base salary
To enable the Group to
attract, motivate and
retain the people it needs
to maximise the value of
the business
Generally reviewed each year,
withincreases effective 1 April with
reference to salary levels at other
FTSE companies of broadly similar
size or sector to Norcros.
The Committee also considers
the salary increases applying
across the rest of the UK business
when determining increases for
ExecutiveDirectors.
Base salary increases are applied
inline with the outcome of the
annualreview.
Salaries in respect of the year
under review (and for the
following year) are disclosed
in the Annual Report on
Remuneration.
Salary increases for Executive
Directors will normally not
exceed those of the wider
workforce over the period
this policy will apply. Where
increases are awarded in
excess of the wider employee
population, for example if
there is a material change
in the responsibility, size
or complexity of the role,
the Committee will provide
the rationale in the relevant
year’s Annual Report on
Remuneration.
n/a
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
Component and objectiveOperationOpportunityPerformance measures
Pension
To provide a level of
retirement beneit that
is competitive in the
relevant market
Executive Directors receive pension
contributions (either as a direct
payment or a cash allowance).
Base salary is the only element of
remuneration that is pensionable.
Executive Directors receive
a Company contribution
in line with the employer
contribution available for
the wider workforce in the
relevantmarket.
n/a
Beneits
Provision of beneits
inlinewith the market
Executive Directors are provided
with a company car (or a cash
allowance in lieu thereof) and
medical insurance. Other beneits
may be introduced from time to
time to ensure the beneits package
is appropriately competitive and
relects the needs and circumstances
of the Group and individual Executive
Director.
Beneits may vary by role, and
the level is determined each
year to be appropriate for the
role and circumstances of each
individual ExecutiveDirector.
It is not anticipated that the
cost of beneits (as set out
in the Annual Report on
Remuneration) would increase
materially over the period for
which this policy will apply.
The Committee retains the
discretion to approve a
higher cost in exceptional
circumstances (e.g. relocation
expenses or an expatriation
allowance on recruitment,
etc.) or in circumstances
where factors outside the
Company’s control have
changed materially (e.g. market
increases in insurance costs).
n/a
Annual bonus
andDeferred Bonus
PlanDBP
To focus Executive
Directors on achieving
demanding annual
targets relating to
Group performance and
encourage retention
Performance targets are set at the
start of the year and aligned with the
annual budget agreed by the Board.
At the end of the year, the Committee
determines the extent to which these
targets have been achieved.
50% of the total bonus payment is
paid in cash, and 50% is converted
into nil-cost options over Norcros
shares under the Deferred Bonus Plan
(DBP). These options are exercisable
after three years, subject to continued
employment and malus (in whole or
in part) during the deferral period in
the event of a material misstatement
in accounting records, gross
misconduct, calculation error or
corporate failure.
Cash bonuses may be subject to
clawback over the deferral period in
similar circumstances as identiied
above.
A payment equivalent to the dividends
that would have accrued on deferred
bonus awards that vest will be made
to participants on vesting.
Maximum opportunity: 100%
of base salary.
Target opportunity: 50% of
base salary.
For threshold performance,
thebonus payout is up
to25%of maximum.
The bonus will be based primarily
on the achievement of inancial
performance targets but may,
from time to time, include non-
inancial performance measures
(the weighting of which, if any,
will be capped at 25% of the
total opportunity). Details of the
measures on which the bonus
will be based shall be disclosed
in the relevant Annual Report
onRemuneration.
The Committee has discretion
to adjust the formulaic bonus
outcomes (including down to zero)
within the limits of the scheme
to ensure alignment of pay
withperformance.
Further details, including targets
attached to the bonus for the year
under review, are provided in the
Annual Report onRemuneration.
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED
Executive Director remuneration policy table continued
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Component and objectiveOperationOpportunityPerformance measures
Approved Performance
Share Plan APSP
To incentivise Executive
Directors to deliver
long-term performance
that is aligned with
shareholders’ interests
APSP awards comprise annual
conditional awards of nil-cost options
following the announcement of the
Group’s inal results.
Awards normally vest after three
years, subject to the achievement
of a performance condition and
continued employment with the
Group until the vesting date.
To the extent an award vests,
Executive Directors will be required
to hold net vested shares for an
additional holding period of two years.
A payment equivalent to the
dividends that would have accrued
on APSP awards that vest will be
made to participants on vesting.
APSP awards are also subject to
malus over the vesting period
and clawback over the holding
period (in both cases in whole or
in part) in the event of a material
misstatement in accounting records,
gross misconduct, calculation error
orcorporate failure.
Maximum opportunities:
CEO – 150% of base salary.
CFO – 125% of base salary.
Threshold performance results
in 25% vesting.
Details of actual APSP awards
in respect of each year will be
disclosed in the Annual Report
on Remuneration.
Vesting of APSP awards is
dependent upon Group
performance over a three-
year period. Any non-inancial
measures will have a maximum
aggregate weighting of 25% of
the opportunity. Details of the
measures attaching to each
award cycle will be disclosed in
the relevant Annual Report on
Remuneration. At the start of
each cycle, the Committee will
determine the targets that will
apply to an award.
If the performance targets are not
met at the end of the performance
period, awards will lapse.
The Committee has discretion
to adjust the formulaic APSP
outcomes within the limits of
the scheme if certain relevant
events take place (e.g. a
capital restructuring, a material
acquisition/divestment, etc.) with
any such adjustment to result in the
revised targets being no more or
less challenging to achieve.
The Committee will consult
major shareholders on changes
to the APSP, although it retains
discretion to make changes to the
performance measures attaching
tofuture cycles without reverting
toa full shareholder vote.
Further details, including the
targets attached to the APSP
in respect of each year, are
disclosed in the Annual Report
onRemuneration.
SAYE
To encourage the ownership
of Norcros plc shares
An HMRC-approved scheme where
employees (including Executive
Directors) may save up to the
individual monthly limit set by HMRC
from time to time over three years.
Options are granted at a discount
ofup to 20%.
Savings capped at the
individual monthly limit set by
HMRC (or other such lower
limit as the Committee may
determine) from time to time.
n/a
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
Component and objectiveOperationOpportunityPerformance measures
Shareholding
requirements
To align Executive Director
and shareholder interests
and reinforce long-term
decision making, including
for a period following
cessation of employment
Executive Directors are required to
retain at least 50% of any DBP or
APSP awards that vest (net of tax)
until they have built up a personal
holding of Norcros plc shares worth a
deined multiple of their salaries (of at
least 100% of salary).
Details of the in-post shareholding
requirements that apply to the
Executive Directors are set out in the
Annual Report on Remuneration.
Executive Directors will additionally
be required normally to maintain
a holding in Norcros plc shares for
a period of two years after they
cease to be a Director of the Group.
For the irst year this shareholding
guideline will be equal to the lower
of a Director’s actual shareholding at
the time of their departure and the
shareholding requirement in effect
at the date of their departure, and for
the second year 50% of that igure.
The speciic application of this
shareholding guideline will be at
the Committee’s discretion. Only
shares that are held beneicially
by an Executive Director or their
spouse or partner, or nil-cost options
granted under the DBP count in the
assessment of whether an Executive
Director has met the required
ownership level.
n/an/a
Notes to the policy table
Payments from previous awards
For the avoidance of doubt the Group will honour any commitment entered into, and Executive Directors will be eligible to receive
payment from any award made, prior to the approval and implementation of the remuneration policy detailed in this report. Details
ofthese awards are, and will be, disclosed in the Annual Report on Remuneration.
Performance measure selection and approach to target setting
The measures used in the annual bonus will be selected by the Committee to directly reinforce our medium-term growth-orientated
strategy (see page 20 and 21 for further details of the strategy; details of the measures selected for use in the bonus for the year in review
and for the coming year are set out in the Annual Report on Remuneration). For the APSP, the Committee shall select measures that are
transparent, objective and effective measures of performance that are in the long-term interests of all of our shareholders (further details
of the APSP measures are set out in the Annual Report on Remuneration).
Targets applying to the annual bonus and APSP are reviewed annually, based on a number of internal and external reference points.
Annual bonus targets are aligned with the annual budget agreed by the Board. Annual bonus targets are considered to be commercially
sensitive but will be disclosed retrospectively in the following year’s Annual Report on Remuneration. APSP targets relect industry
context, expectations of what will constitute appropriately challenging performance levels and factors speciic to the Group. The
Committee will determine the APSP targets at the time awards are made and these targets (along with other relevant details of the grant)
will ordinarily be disclosed in the following year’s Annual Report on Remuneration.
Differences from remuneration policy for other employees
The remuneration policy for other employees is based on broadly consistent principles as described above. Annual salary reviews across the
Group take into account Group performance, local pay and market conditions, and salary levels for similar roles in comparable companies.
Executives and senior managers are eligible to participate in annual bonus schemes. Opportunities and performance measures vary by
organisational level, geographical region and an individual’s role. Other members of the Group senior leadership team participate in the
APSP on similar terms as the Executive Directors, although award sizes may vary by organisational level. All UK and Republic of Ireland
employees are eligible to participate in the Group’s SAYE scheme on identical terms.
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED
Executive Director remuneration policy table continued
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Performance scenario charts
Chief Executive Oficer
Minimum100%
£470k
On target60%27% 13%
£785k
Maximum36%32%32%
£1,310k
Maximum
+ 50% SPG
31%28%41%
£1,520k
Chief Financial Oficer
Minimum100%
£361k
On target60%27% 13%
£601k
Maximum36%32%32%
£1,001k
Maximum
+ 50% SPG
31%28%41%
£1,161k
Fixed pay Annual bonus APSP
The charts above provide estimates of the potential future reward opportunity for Executive Directors, and the potential mix between the
different elements of remuneration under four different performance scenarios: “Minimum”, “On target”, “Maximum” and “Maximum + 50%
share price growth (SPG)”. This information is for the current inancial year, as explained below.
The potential opportunities illustrated above are based on the proposed policy applied to base salaries at 1 April 2023. For the annual
bonus, the amounts illustrated are those potentially receivable in respect of performance for the year to 31 March 2024. It should be
noted that any bonus deferred into the DBP and APSP awards does not normally vest until the third anniversary of the date of grant. This is
intended to illustrate the relationship between executive pay and performance. The values of the DBP and APSP assume no increase in the
underlying value of the shares (except the APSP value under the “Maximum + 50% SPG” scenario) and actual pay delivered will further be
inluenced by changes in factors such as the Group’s share price and the value of dividends paid.
Valuation assumptions
The “Minimum” scenario relects base salary, pension and beneits (i.e. ixed remuneration), being the only elements of the Executive
Directors’ remuneration package not linked to performance.
The “On target” scenario relects ixed remuneration as above, plus target bonus payout (50% of salary) and APSP threshold vesting at
25% of the maximum award level.
The “Maximum” scenario relects ixed remuneration, plus full payout under all incentives (100% of salary under each of the annual bonus
and APSP).
The “Maximum + 50% SPG” scenario relects ixed remuneration, plus full payout under all incentives (100% of salary under each of the
annual bonus and APSP). The value of the APSP additionally relects 50% SPG.
Approach to Executive Director recruitment and remuneration
External appointment
In cases of hiring or appointing a new Executive Director from outside the Group, the Remuneration Committee may make use of all
existing components of remuneration, as follows:
ComponentPolicy
Base salaryThe base salaries of new appointees will be determined by reference to relevant market data, experience and skills
of the individual, internal relativities and the current salary of the incumbent in the role.
Where a new appointee has an initial base salary set below market, the Committee may make phased increases over
a period of three years, subject to the individual’s development and performance in the role.
BeneitsAs set out in the policy table, beneits may include (but are not limited to) the provision of a company car or car allowance,
medical insurance, and any necessary expatriation allowances or expenses relating to an executive’s relocation.
PensionNew appointees will receive pension contributions into a deined contribution pension arrangement or an
equivalent cash supplement, or a combination of both. Company contributions to pension will be in line with that
available for the wider workforce in the relevant market.
SAYENew appointees will be eligible to participate on identical terms to all other employees.
Annual bonusThe bonus structure described in the policy table will apply to new appointees. The maximum opportunity will
be 100% of salary, pro-rated in the year of joining to relect the proportion of that year employed. Performance
measures may include strategic and operational objectives tailored to the individual in the inancial year of joining.
50% of any bonus earned will be deferred into the DBP on the same terms as other Executive Directors.
APSPNew appointees will be granted annual awards under the APSP on the same terms as other Executive Directors
(including in relation to award opportunities), asdescribed in the policy table.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
Approach to Executive Director recruitment and remuneration continued
External appointment continued
In determining the appropriate remuneration structure and level for the appointee, the Remuneration Committee will take into
consideration all relevant factors to ensure that arrangements are in the best interests of our shareholders. It is not the intention of the
Committee that a cash payment such as a “golden hello” would be offered. However, the Committee may make an award in respect of a
new appointment to “buy out” incentive arrangements forfeited on leaving a previous employer, over and above the approach and award
limits outlined in the table above. Any such award will be made under existing incentive structures, where appropriate, and will be subject
to the normal performance conditions of those incentives. The Committee may also consider it appropriate to make “buy out” awards
under a different structure, using the relevant Listing Rule where necessary, to replicate the structure of forfeited awards. Any “buy out”
award (however this is delivered) would have a fair value no higher than that of the awards forfeited, taking into account relevant factors
including performance conditions, the likelihood of those conditions being met and the proportion of the vesting period remaining.
Details of any such award will be disclosed in the irst Annual Report on Remuneration following its grant.
Internal promotion to the Board
In cases of appointing a new Executive Director by way of internal promotion, the policy will be consistent with that for external
appointees detailed in the table above (i.e. excluding the lexibility to make “buy out” awards). Where an individual has contractual
commitments made prior to their promotion to the Board, and it is agreed that a commitment is to continue, the Group will continue
to honour these arrangements even if there are instances where they would not otherwise be consistent with the prevailing Executive
Director remuneration policy at the time of promotion.
Service contracts and policy for payment for loss of ofice
Executive Directors have signed rolling contracts, terminable on twelve months’ notice by either the Group or the Director. The Group
entered into a contract with Thomas Willcocks on 1 April 2023, and with James Eyre on 1 August 2021. Copies of these contracts are
available to view at the Group’s registered ofice.
The Committee’s policy for Directors’ termination payments is to provide only what would normally be due to Directors had they remained
in employment in respect of the relevant notice period, and not to go beyond their normal contractual entitlements. Any incentive
arrangements will be dealt with subject to the relevant rules, with any discretion exercised by the Committee on a case by case basis
taking into account the circumstances of the termination. Termination payments will also take into account any statutory entitlement
at the appropriate level, to be considered by the Committee on the same basis. The Committee will monitor and where appropriate
enforce the Directors’ duty to mitigate loss. When the Committee believes that it is essential to protect the Group’s interests, additional
arrangements may be entered into (for example post-termination protections above and beyond those in the contract of employment) on
appropriate terms.
Under the service contracts for each Executive Director, the Company has the discretion to terminate the employment lawfully without
any notice by paying to the Director a sum equal to, but no more than, the salary and other contractual beneits of the Director. The
payment would be in respect of that part of the period of notice which the Director has not worked, less any appropriate tax and other
statutory deductions. The Director would be entitled to any holiday pay which may otherwise have accrued in what would have been the
notice period. The Company may pay any sums due under these pay in lieu of notice provisions as one lump sum or in instalments of
what would have been the notice period. If the Company elects to pay in instalments, the Director is under an express contractual duty to
mitigate their losses and to disclose any third party income they have received or are due to receive. The Company reserves the right to
reduce the amount of the instalments by the amount of such income. The Committee would expect to include similar pay in lieu of notice
provisions in any future Executive Directors’ service contract.
Also under their service contracts, if the Director’s employment is terminated for whatever reason, they agree that they are not entitled to any
damages or compensation to recompense them for the loss or diminution in value of any actual or prospective rights, beneits or expectations
under or in relation to the APSP, the DBP, the SAYE plan or the annual discretionary bonus scheme. This is without prejudice to any of the rights,
beneits or entitlements which may have accrued to the Director under such arrangements at the termination of employment.
The table below summarises how awards under the annual bonus, DBP and APSP are typically treated in speciic circumstances, with the
inal treatment remaining subject to the Committee’s discretion:
Reason for cessationCalculation of vesting/paymentTiming of payment/vesting
Annual bonus
Voluntary resignation
orsummary dismissal
No bonus paid.n/a
All other circumstancesBonuses are paid only to the extent that the associated objectives, as
set at the beginning of the plan year, are met. Any such bonus would
normally be paid on a pro-rata basis, taking account of the period
actually worked.
At the normal payment
date unless the Committee,
in its absolute discretion,
determines that awards
should be paid out on
cessation of employment.
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Reason for cessationCalculation of vesting/paymentTiming of payment/vesting
DBP
Summary dismissalAwards lapse.n/a
Injury, illness, disability,
death, retirement with
the agreement of the
Group, redundancy or
employing company
leaving the Group
Unvested awards vest.At the normal vesting date
unless the Committee,
in its absolute discretion,
determines that awards
should vest on cessation
ofemployment.
Voluntary resignation
or other reason not
stated above
Unvested awards lapse unless the Committee, in its absolute discretion,
determines that an award should vest.
If the Committee determines
that an award should vest,
then awards will vest on their
normal vesting date, unless
the Committee, in its absolute
discretion, determines
that awards should vest on
cessation of employment.
Change of controlUnvested awards will be pro-rated for the portion of the vesting
period elapsed on change of control, unless the Committee, in its
absolute discretion, determines otherwise. Awards may alternatively be
exchanged for new equivalent awards in the acquirer, where appropriate.
On change of control.
APSP
Summary dismissalAwards lapse.n/a
Voluntary resignation,
injury, retirement with
the agreement of the
Group, redundancy or
other reason that the
Committee determines
in its absolute discretion
Unapproved option awards lapse unless the Committee, in its absolute
discretion, determines otherwise. Awards that do not lapse will continue
to be eligible to vest on the normal vesting date, subject to being pro-
rated for time to the date of cessation of employment and performance
over the complete performance period. The Committee may, in its
absolute discretion, determine that awards shall vest on cessation in
exceptional circumstances, subject to being pro-rated for time and
performance to the date of cessation of employment.
Approved option awards lapse, except in the case of retirement with the
agreement of the employer, when awards will vest, subject to pro-rating
as stated above.
Any awards in a holding period will normally remain subject to the
holding requirement until the period ends.
At the normal vesting date
unless the Committee,
in its absolute discretion,
determines otherwise.
DeathUnapproved option awards vest in full but may be subject to the
application of the performance conditions attached to them. Approved
option awards are pro-rated for time and performance to that date.
Immediately.
Change of controlUnapproved option awards vest in full, but may be subject to the
application of the performance conditions attached to them. Approved
option awards are pro-rated for time and performance to that date.
Any awards in a holding period will normally be released.
Awards vest, subject to being pro-rated for time and performance to
the date of cessation of employment, unless the Committee determines
otherwise. Awards may alternatively be exchanged for new equivalent
awards in the acquirer, where appropriate.
On change of control.
External appointments
Executive Directors are permitted to take up non-executive positions on the boards of other companies, subject to the prior approval of
the Board. The Executive Directors may retain any fees payable in relation to such appointment. Details of external appointments and the
associated fees received are included in the Annual Report on Remuneration.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
Consideration of employment conditions elsewhere in the Group
The Group seeks to promote and maintain good relations with employees and (where relevant) their representative bodies as part of its
broader employee engagement strategy. The Committee is mindful of salary increases applying across the rest of the business in relevant
markets when considering salaries for Executive Directors but does not currently consult with employees speciically on executive
remuneration policy and framework. However, as part of its broader remit, the Committee has detailed oversight of, and is invited to input
on, workforce remuneration policies and practices to help ensure these are underpinned by, and implemented to reinforce, a consistent
set of values and principles.
Consideration of shareholder views
The Committee considers shareholder views received during the year and at the Annual General Meeting each year, as well as guidance
from shareholder representative bodies more broadly, in shaping remuneration policy. The vast majority of shareholders continue to
express support for remuneration arrangements at Norcros. In developing the proposed policy set out in this report, we consulted with
shareholders representing a total of c.80% of our issued share capital, as well as shareholder representative bodies. We are pleased to
report that many investors who provided feedback indicated support for the proposed approach. The Committee keeps the remuneration
policy under regular review, to ensure it continues to reinforce the Group’s long-term strategy and aligns Executive Directors with
shareholders’ interests. We will continue to consult shareholders before making any signiicant changes to our remuneration policy.
Non-executive Director remuneration policy
Non-executive Directors (including the Board Chair) have letters of appointment which specify an initial term of at least three years,
although these contracts may be terminated at one month’s notice by either the Company or Director. In line with the UK Corporate
Governance Code guidelines, all Directors are subject to re-election annually at the AGM.
Details of terms and notice periods for Non-executive Directors are summarised below:
Non-executive Director
Date of
appointmentNotice period
David McKeith July month
Alison Littley May month
Stefan Allanson January month
It is the policy of the Board of Directors that Non-executive Directors are not eligible to participate in any of the Group’s bonus, long-term
incentive or pension schemes. Details of the policy on fees paid to our Non-executive Directors are set out in the table below:
Component and objectiveOperationOpportunity
Performance
measures
Fees
To attract and retain
Non-executive Directors
of the highest calibre
with broad commercial
experience relevant
to the Group
The fee paid to the Chair is determined by the
Committee excluding the Chair. The fees paid to the
other Non-executive Directors are determined by the
Chair and the Executive Directors.
Fee levels are reviewed periodically, with any
adjustments effective 1 April. Fees are reviewed by
taking into account external advice on best practice
and fee levels at other FTSE companies of broadly
similar size and sector to Norcros. Time commitment
and responsibility are also taken into account when
reviewing fees.
Aggregate fees are limited to
£350,000 p.a. by the Group’s
Articles of Association.
Fee increases will be applied
taking into account the
outcome of the review.
The fees paid to Non-
executive Directors in
respect of the year under
review (and for the following
year) are disclosed in
the Annual Report on
Remuneration.
n/a
Approach to Non-executive Director recruitment remuneration
In recruiting a new Non-executive Director, the Remuneration Committee will use the policy as set out in the table above. A base fee in line
with the prevailing fee schedule would be payable for serving as a Director of the Board, with additional fees payable for acting as Chair
ofthe Audit and Risk or Remuneration Committees, or as a Senior Independent Director.
DIRECTORS’ REMUNERATION POLICY REPORT CONTINUED
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION
The following section provides details of how our 2020 policy was implemented during the year ended 31 March 2023 and how the
proposed 2023 policy will be implemented in the year ending 31 March 2024.
Remuneration Committee membership in the year ended 31 March 2023
The Remuneration Committee is responsible for recommending to the Board the remuneration policy for Executive Directors and
the members of the Group’s senior management, and for setting the remuneration packages for the Board Chair and each Executive
Director. The Committee’s responsibilities are set out in its Terms of Reference, which can be found on the Company’s website at
www.norcros.com.
During the year under review, the following Directors were members of the Remuneration Committee:
• Alison Littley (Committee Chair);
• David McKeith;
• Gary Kennedy (from appointment on 8 December 2021 to 13 February 2023); and
• Stefan Allanson (from 1 January 2023).
All members of the Committee are independent. They serve on the Committee for a minimum three-year term and a maximum of
nine years, provided the Director remains independent. As part of an effectiveness review for the entire Board, an evaluation of the
Remuneration Committee was undertaken in the year to 31 March 2023. We are pleased to report this review concluded that the
Committee continues to operate effectively.
In addition, the Chief Executive Oficer was invited to attend Committee meetings as appropriate to advise on speciic questions raised
by the Committee and on matters relating to the performance and remuneration of senior managers, other than in relation to his own
remuneration. The Group Counsel and Company Secretary acts as secretary to the Committee. No individual was present while decisions
were made regarding their own remuneration.
The Committee met seven times during the year. Attendance by individual members at meetings is detailed on page 86.
Main activities of the Committee during the year ended 31 March 2023
The main activities carried out by the Committee during the year under review were:
• reviewing and setting salary levels for Executive Directors and senior management;
• approving the remuneration terms for Nick Kelsall on his retirement as CEO;
• approving the remuneration package for Thomas Willcocks on his appointment as CEO (effective 1 April 2023);
• reviewing the Directors’ remuneration policy (ahead of this being put to a binding shareholder vote at the 2023 AGM);
• determining the annual bonus outcome for the year ended 31 March 2022;
• setting operating proit targets for the annual bonus for the year ended 31 March 2023;
• calibrating EPS targets for, and granting of, 2022 APSP awards;
• reviewing developments in remuneration governance;
• reviewing and setting the fees payable to the Non-executive Board Chair; and
• reviewing the pay policies and practices for the wider workforce.
Advisers
During the year under review, the Committee sought independent advice from Ellason LLP. Ellason is a member and signatory of the
Code of Conduct for Remuneration Consultants, details of which can be found at www.remunerationconsultantsgroup.com. In the year
to 31 March 2023, Ellason provided the following services:
Services provided
Fees
excl. VAT
EllasonGuidance on developments in remuneration governance and market trends and implications for
Norcros, remuneration benchmarking for annual review and new appointments, Remuneration Report
drafting support and general support to the Committee throughout the year on remuneration related
matters, including the review of the remuneration policy.
Ellason does not provide other services to the Company or its Directors and the Committee is satisied that the advice it receives is independent.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED
Summary of shareholder voting at the AGM
The following table shows the results of the advisory vote on the 2021 Annual Report onRemuneration at the 2021 AGM, and the binding
vote on the remuneration policy at the 2020 AGM:
Annual Report on Remuneration
AGM
Remuneration policy
AGM
Total number
of votes
of
votes cast
Total number
of votes
of
votes cast
For including discretionary
Against
Total votes cast excluding withheld votes
Votes withheld
Total votes including withheld votes
Single igure for total remuneration for Executive Directors (audited information)
The following table provides a single igure for total remuneration of the Executive Directors for the year to 31 March 2023, together with
comparative igures for the year to 31 March 2022. The values of each element of remuneration are based on the actual value delivered,
where known. The value of the annual bonus includes the element of bonus deferred under the Deferred Bonus Plan.
Nick KelsallJames Eyre
Base salary
Taxable beneits
Annual bonus
Share based payments
——
Post-employment beneit
SAYE
————
Total ixed
Total variable
Total
1 Base salaries for 2023 relect the amounts disclosed and explained in last year’s Directors’ Remuneration Report.
2 Taxable beneits consist of car allowance (Nick Kelsall – 2023: £15,000, 2022: £15,000; and James Eyre – 2023: £12,000, 2022: £8,000) and private medical insurance.
3 Annual bonus comprises both the cash annual bonus for performance during the year and, where applicable, the face value of the deferred bonus element on the date of deferral.
Any deferred share element is deferred for three years. See “Annual bonus in respect of performance in the year ended 31 March 2023” opposite for further details.
4 For 2023, the APSP value relects the estimated value of APSP awards granted in November 2020, of which 98.9% will vest to Nick Kelsall and James Eyre on 25 November 2023
(equivalent to 192,270 shares and 42,121 shares to Nick Kelsall and James Eyre respectively). James Eyre was not an Executive Director at the time the award was granted, as such
the shares awarded will not be subject to the usual two-year holding period. The reported values include the dividends expected to be accrued on these awards over the period
from grant to the expected vesting date (£54,604 and £11,962 respectively) and are estimated using the three-month average share price to 31 March 2023 of 201.1p. This will be
trued up to relect the vest-date value of awards in next year’s Annual Report on Remuneration. Of the values for the 2020 APSP reported in the table above, c.4% (equivalent to
£13,651 and £2,991 for Nick Kelsall and James Eyre respectively) results from share price growth above the grant price of 194p. For 2022, the APSP value of nil relects the value of
APSP awards granted in July 2019 and which lapsed in full on 25 July 2022.
5 In 2023, pension beneits comprised cash in lieu (Nick Kelsall – £63,070; and James Eyre – £23,200) and amounts related to the deined beneit scheme (Nick Kelsall – £40,560).
See“Total pension entitlements” on page 108 for further details. The pension beneit provided to Nick Kelsall and James Eyre in 2022 comprises cash in lieu (Nick Kelsall – £58,270;
andJames Eyre – £13,915) and amounts related to the deined beneit scheme (Nick Kelsall – £14,640). Nick Kelsall’s pension contribution was reduced voluntarily from 1January2023
to 8% of salary, to align with the contribution available to the wider UK workforce.
6 Embedded gain on grant of Save As You Earn Scheme grants made in the relevant year.
7 The 2022 igures shown for James Eyre relate to the period 1 August 2021–31 March 2022, i.e. from his appointment as CFO and a Board Director.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Incentive outcomes for the year ended 31 March 2023 (audited information)
Annual bonus in respect of performance in the year ended 31 March 2023
The 2023 Annual Bonus Plan was based 100% on Group underlying operating proit performance for the year to 31 March 2023. The
maximum annual bonus opportunity for the year was 100% of base salary for the Chief Executive Oficer and for the Chief Financial
Oficer. Based on the Company’s performance in 2023, against the stretching targets set at the start of the year, the Committee approved
annual bonus payouts for the Executive Directors at 32.3% of maximum. Further details, including the proit targets set and actual
performance, are provided below:
Underlying
proit target
m
Payout
of max.
outturn
m
Bonus
of max.
Maximum
Target
Threshold
1 Target was set on a pre-IFRS 16 basis; therefore, the 2023 outturn has been assessed on a similar basis, i.e. underlying operating proit of £45.5m pre-IFRS 16 (reported £47.3m).
In keeping with good practice, the Committee reviewed the formulaic outcome of the annual bonus in the context of business
performance and the wider stakeholder experience. The Committee concluded that the formulaic outcome relected robust results
delivered in such challenging circumstances through exceptional leadership and the hard work of the Executive Directors and the wider
senior management team. The Committee also concluded that the outcomes relect the underlying performance of the Group more
generally, and the experience of other stakeholders. Accordingly, no discretion has been exercised in relation to the bonus outcome for
the 2023 inancial year.
2020 APSP awards vesting
Effective November 2020, APSP awards of 194,409 shares were granted to Nick Kelsall, and of 42,590 shares to James Eyre. Vesting
of these awards was based on Norcros’ diluted underlying EPS in the inancial year to 31 March 2023. Based on performance in the
year to 31March 2023, against the targets originally set, the Committee has determined that these awards will each vest at 98.9%
on 24November 2023, being the end of the relevant three-year vesting period according to the APSP rules. James Eyre was not an
Executive Director at the time the award was granted, as such the shares awarded to him will not be subject to the usual two-year holding
period.Performance targets and actual performance against these, as determined by the Committee, are summarised in the table below:
Diluted
underlying EPS vesting
Norcros’
performance
Award vesting
of APSP award
Thresholdp
Maximumpp
Scheme interests awarded in 2023 (audited information)
2022 DBP
During the year under review, the following DBP awards were made to the Executive Directors (relating to the annual bonus earned for
performance over the year to 31 March 2022).
Nick KelsallJames Eyre
Basis of award of earned bonus of earned bonus
Grant date July July
Number of nil-cost options granted
Grant-date share price p
Grant-date face value
Normal vesting date July July
Performance conditionsNoneNone
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED
Scheme interests awarded in 2023 (audited information) continued
2022 APSP
During the year under review, the following APSP awards were granted to the Executive Directors:
Nick KelsallJames Eyre
Basis of award of base salary of base salary
Grant date July July
Number of nil-cost options granted
Grant-date share price p
Grant-date face value
Normal vesting date July July
Performance period April – March April – March
Holding period July – July July – July
2022 SAYE
In the year ended 31 March 2023, none of the Executive Directors entered into a savings contract for the 2022 SAYE scheme as they were
already contracted under previous SAYE grants at the HMRC limits.
Total pension entitlements (audited information)
As part of their remuneration arrangements, Nick Kelsall and James Eyre are entitled to receive pension contributions from the Company.
Under these arrangements, they can elect for those contributions to be paid in the form of taxable pension allowance, or direct payments
into a personal pension plan or the Group’s UK deined contribution scheme. If a payment is made in the form of taxable pension
allowance, the amount payable is not reduced to allow for employment taxes.
During the year Nick Kelsall elected to take a taxable pension allowance of £63,070 (2022: £58,270) with no amounts paid directly into
apension scheme (2022: £nil). James Eyre elected to take a taxable pension in the year of £23,200 (2022: £13,915) with no amounts paid
directly into a pension scheme (2022: £nil). In line with the Regulations, the single igure table relects the total of these amounts, as well
as the capitalised increase in accrued pension (net of inlation) under the UK deined beneit scheme, of which Nick Kelsall is a deferred
member. James Eyre is not a member of the UK deined beneit scheme. Details of Executive Directors’ retirement beneits under the
Group’s UK deined beneit scheme and taxable pension allowances are summarised in the following table:
Director
Accrued
pension
Accrued
pension
Increase in
accrued
pension
net of CPI
Applicable
period
years
Pension
value in the
year from
DB scheme
Pension value
in the year
from cash
allowance
Total
Nick Kelsall
James Eyre—————
Single igure for total remuneration for Non-executive Directors (audited information)
The table below sets out a single igure for the total remuneration received by each Non-executive Director for the year ended 31 March
2023 and the prior year:
Total fee
Gary Kennedy
Alison Littley
David McKeith
Stefan Allanson
—
1 Gary Kennedy joined the Board on 8 December 2021. He was incapacitated due to ill health from 23 January 2023 and passed away on 13 February 2023.
2 David McKeith acted as Board Chair from 24 January 2023. During this period, Mr McKeith received the Board Chair fee on a pro-rata basis, and did not receive any additional
feefor chairing the Audit and Risk Committee, or in his capacity as Senior Independent Director (for which an additional fee of £3,000 p.a. was introduced from 1 April 2022).
3 Stefan Allanson was appointed on 1 January 2023.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Payments made to the outgoing CEO in the year (audited information)
All payments to Nick Kelsall in connection to his tenure as CEO for the full year ended 31 March 2023 are included in the single igure table
above. Nick retired and stepped down from the Board on 31 March 2023, and the Committee has agreed to treat him as a “good leaver” in
respect of his outstanding DBP and APSP awards, in recognition of his long and valued service to the Group. In line with our remuneration
policy, DBP awards will continue to vest on the normal vesting date. APSP awards (which will be pro-rated to the date he ceases
employment with the Group, of 30 January 2024) will vest on the normal vesting date subject to the achievement of the performance
conditions attaching to each award. The applicable holding period will continue to apply. Nick remains subject to the post-employment
shareholding requirement, in line with our remuneration policy.
Payments to past Directors (audited information)
No payments to past Directors were made during the year under review.
External appointments in the year
No external appointments were held by the Executive Directors during the year.
Percentage change in Director remuneration
The table below shows the annual percentage change in remuneration from 2020 to 2023 for each individual who served as a Director
during the year ended 31 March 2023, compared with the percentage change in remuneration for all UK staff employed in continuing
operations. A UK subset of employees (who are employed by the UK operating subsidiary of Norcros plc) was selected as a suitable
comparator group for this analysis because the Directors (who are employed or engaged by Norcros plc) are based in the UK (albeit with
global roles and responsibilities) and pay changes across the Group vary widely depending on local market conditions (in particular
luctuations in the exchange rate between the South African Rand and British Pound). The comparison uses a per capita igure and
accordingly this relects an average across the Group’s businesses. No account is therefore taken of the impact of operational factors
such as new joiners and leavers and the mix of employees.
Salary or fees
Beneits Bonus
Executive Directors
Nick Kelsalln/a
James Eyren/an/an/an/an/an/a
Non-executive Directors
Alison Littleyn/an/an/an/an/an/a
David McKeith
n/an/an/an/an/an/a
Stefan Allanson
n/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/a
Gary Kennedy
n/an/an/an/an/an/an/an/a
Average of other employeesn/a
1 Salary and fee igures are annualised for this comparison.
2 Year on year comparison relects the impact of Mr McKeith assuming the role of Board Chair from 15 April to 8 December 2021 and from 24 January 2023.
3 No year on year comparison is shown as Stefan Allanson joined the Board during the 2023 inancial year.
4 Gary Kennedy joined the Board on 4 December 2021 and was Chair until he passed away on 13 February 2023.
Relative importance of spend on pay
The table below shows shareholder distributions (i.e. dividends – there were no share buybacks in either year) and Norcros’ expenditure
on total employee pay for the year under review and the prior year, and the percentage change year on year.
m
m change
Dividends i.e. total payments made in year
Dividend per share i.e. total dividend per share in pence in respect of yearpp
Total staff costs
1 Total staff costs include the staff costs of Grant Westield since the date of acquisition.
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED
CEO pay ratio
The Large and Medium-sized Companies and Groups (Accounts and Reports) Regulations 2008 (the Regulations) require certain
companies to disclose the ratio of the Chief Executive’s pay, using the amount set out in the single total igure table (shown in this report
on page 106), to that of the total remuneration of full-time equivalent UK employees at the 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile.
Therequired information is set out in the table below:
YearMethod
th percentile
pay ratio
Median
pay ratio
th percentile
pay ratio
Option B
Option B
Option B
Option B
CEO pay
P pay
P pay
P pay
Total remuneration
Base salary
Total remuneration
Base salary
Total remuneration
Base salary
Total remuneration
Base salary
The 25th percentile, median and 75th percentile igures used to determine the above ratios were selected by reference to the hourly pay
igures for the Group’s UK workforce, taken from its gender pay gap statistics for the relevant year and from these identifying the three
employees who are at each percentile point. The full-time equivalent annualised remuneration (comprising salary, beneits, pension,
annual bonus and long-term incentives) for those employees for the year ended 31 March 2023 was then calculated. This methodology
is deined in the Regulations as Option B, which was chosen as the most appropriate methodology given the employee demographics of
the Group’s UK workforce. The trend year on year of pay ratios for each percentile is that the ratios have increased. This is explained by a
proportionately greater increase in the variable elements of the CEO’s remuneration, relative to the comparators and the resulting impact
of continued robust Group performance on incentive outcomes.
Performance graph and table
The following graph shows the ten-year TSR performance of the Company relative to the FTSE All-Share Construction & Materials Index.
This comparator was chosen because the Company is a constituent member of this index.
Total shareholder return
(Value of £100 invested on 31 March 2013)
Investment (£)
31 March
2013
350
300
250
200
150
100
50
0
31 March
2014
31 March
2015
31 March
2016
31 March
2017
31 March
2018
31 March
2019
31 March
2020
31 March
2021
31 March
2022
31 March
2023
Norcros
FTSE All-Share Index
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
The table below details the Group Chief Executive’s single igure of remuneration over the same period:
CEO single igure of
remuneration
IncumbentNick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Nick
Kelsall
Total remuneration
Annual bonus asa
of max. opportunity—
APSP vesting asa
of max. opportunity——
Implementation of Executive Director remuneration policy for the year to 31 March 2024
The Remuneration Committee conducted a thorough review of Executive Directors’ remuneration, effective 1 April 2023. The results
ofthis review are as follows:
Base salary
Thomas Willcocks was appointed CEO effective 1 April 2023, and his salary set by the Committee at £420,000 from this date.
As disclosed in last year’s report, the Committee resolved to increase James Eyre’s base salary to £320,000 in two stages. The irst
of these stages, to £290,000, was implemented with effect from 1 April 2022. In determining to implement the second increase with
effect from 1 April 2023, the Committee took into account a range of factors, including James Eyre’s continued strong performance and
contribution to the Group – particularly his invaluable support to Nick Kelsall and Thomas Willcocks through the CEO transition – as well
as the inlationary environment (which was unforeseen at the time of agreeing the two-stage increase). In this context, the Committee
concluded that it was appropriate to implement the second increase as originally intended, noting that this salary level is now positioned
to be appropriately competitive for similar roles of comparable scope, scale and complexity.
Pension
Both Executive Directors receive a pension contribution, or allowance in lieu, of 8% of salary, in line with the employer contribution available
for the wider UK workforce.
Beneits
Other beneits consist of car allowance, aligned at £15,000 for all Executive Directors for the year ending 31 March 2024, and private
medical insurance.
Annual bonus
The annual bonus opportunity for Executive Directors will remain unchanged for the 2024 inancial year with a maximum bonus
opportunity of 100% of salary. The bonus outcome for Executive Directors will continue to be based entirely on Group underlying
operating proit. Of any bonus earned 50% will be deferred into nil-cost options for a further three years under the DBP. Annual bonus
targets will be disclosed in next year’s Annual Report on Remuneration, subject to these no longer being considered by the Board to be
commercially sensitive.
APSP
APSP awards will be made in the 2024 inancial year to the Executive Directors, with face values of 100% of salary. As explained at the start
of this Remuneration Report, vesting of these awards will be subject to the achievement of suitably stretching EPS targets in accordance
with the remuneration policy, and a discretionary assessment by the Committee of the quality of earnings over the performance period
by reference to the Group’s ROCE performance. To the extent an award vests, vested shares will be subject to a further two-year holding
period. The Committee will determine targets at the time awards are made and these targets (along with other relevant details of this
grant) will be disclosed in next year’s Annual Report on Remuneration.
SAYE
Thomas Willcocks and James Eyre will continue to be able to participate in any SAYE contract offered to all employees, on identical terms.
Implementation of Non-executive Director remuneration policy for the year to 31 March 2024
The Board Chair and the Executive Directors reviewed Non-executive Director fees and concluded that it was appropriate to increase
these, as set out below, to relect the growing time commitment of the role (and for similar reasons introduced an additional fee for
the role of Senior Independent Director from 1 April 2022). Accordingly, for the 2024 inancial year, Non-executive Director fees will be
as follows:
Non-executive Director
Fee at
April
Fee from
April
Percentage
increase
Board Chair determined by the Committee
Non-executive Director
Additional fee for acting as Senior Independent Director
Additional fee for chairing Audit and Risk or Remuneration Committees
Corporate governance
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
ANNUAL REPORT ON REMUNERATION CONTINUED
Executive Director shareholdings (audited information)
The table below shows the shareholding of each Executive Director and their respective shareholding requirement as at 31 March 2023:
Options held
Shares owned
Vested but
not exercised
Unvested
and subject
to performance
Unvested but
not subject
to performance
Shareholding
guideline
of salary
current
holding
Requirement
met?
Nick Kelsall—Yes
James Eyre—Building
Current shareholding is based on shares owned outright and valued using the average share price over the twelve months ended
31March2023 of 209.6p.
Details of the options held are provided in the table below.
The Directors recommend that all shareholders vote in favour of
all of the resolutions to be proposed, as the Directors intend to do
so in respect of their own shares, and consider that they are in the
best interests of the Company and the shareholders as a whole.
By order of the Board
Richard Collins
Company Secretary
14 June 2023
DIRECTORS’ REPORT CONTINUED
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS’ RESPONSIBILITIES
In respect of the Annual Report, the Directors’
Remuneration Report and the inancial statements
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report, the
Directors’ Remuneration Report and the inancial statements in
accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards
and applicable law and regulation.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare inancial
statements for each inancial year. Under that law the Directors
are required to prepare the Group inancial statements in
accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards
and have elected to prepare the Company inancial statements in
accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting
Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and applicable
law). Under company law the Directors must not approve the
inancial statements unless they are satisied that they give a true
and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and
of the proit or loss of the Group for that period. In preparing the
inancial statements, the Directors are required to:
• select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
• state whether applicable international accounting standards
have been followed for the Group inancial statements and
United Kingdom Accounting Standards, comprising FRS 101,
have been followed for the Company inancial statements,
subject to any material departures disclosed and explained in
the inancial statements;
• make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable
and prudent;
• prepare the inancial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and
Company will continue in business; and
• prepare a Directors’ Report, a Strategic Report and a Directors’
Remuneration Report which comply with the requirements of
the Companies Act 2006.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are suficient to show and explain the Group and
Company’s transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy
at any time the inancial position of the Group and Company
and enable them to ensure that the inancial statements and the
Directors’ Remuneration Report comply with the Companies Act
2006 and, as regards the Group inancial statements, Article 4
ofthe IAS Regulation.
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the
Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention
and detection of fraud and other irregularities. The Directors are
responsible for ensuring that the Annual Report and Accounts,
taken as a whole, are fair, balanced and understandable and
provides the information necessary for shareholders to assess the
Group’s position and performance, business model and strategy.
Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the Annual Report
and the inancial statements are made available on a website.
Financial statements are published on the Company’s website
in accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing
the preparation and dissemination of inancial statements, which
may vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance
and integrity of the Company’s website is the responsibility of the
Directors. The Directors’ responsibility also extends to the ongoing
integrity of the inancial statements contained therein.
Directors’ responsibilities pursuant to DTR 4
The Directors conirm to the best of their knowledge:
• the inancial statements have been prepared in accordance with
the applicable set of accounting standards, give a true and fair
view of the assets, liabilities, inancial position and proit and loss
of the Group; and
• the Annual Report includes a fair review of the development and
performance of the business and the inancial position of the
Group and Company, together with a description of the principal
risks and uncertainties that they face.
Thomas Willcocks James Eyre
Chief Executive Oficer Chief Financial Oficer
14 June 2023
Abode: Abode has added its new System Sync
collection to its portfolio, which is designed to
enable homeowners to optimise space in the
kitchen, allowing them to select a sink format
that is right for them with three available bowl
sizes crafted from 0.8mm 304 grade brushed
stainless steel. The Caddy-style sink is said to
be ideal when a second wash zone is required.
Designed with three complementary
accessories, a multi-functional prep board, a
stainless steel colander, and a roll-up FlexRack
to create a customisable sink solution, the idea
is to ensure that no matter the space available,
it can still deliver on function.
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
Independent auditor’s report
Consolidated income statement
Consolidated statement
ofcomprehensiveincome
Consolidated balance sheet
Consolidated cash low statement
Consolidated statement of
changes inequity
Notes to the Group accounts
Parent Company balance sheet
Parent Company statement
ofchangesinequity
Notes to the Parent
Companyaccounts
Norcros plcAnnual Report and Accounts
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT
to the members of Norcros plc
Opinion on the inancial statements
In our opinion:
• the inancial statements give a true and fair view of the state of the Group’s and of the Parent Company’s affairs as at 31 March 2023 and
of the Group’s proit for the year then ended;
• the Group inancial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with UK adopted international accounting standards;
• the Parent Company inancial statements have been properly prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice; and
• the inancial statements have been prepared in accordance with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the inancial statements of Norcros plc (the ‘Parent Company’) and its subsidiaries (the ‘Group’) for the year ended
31 March 2023 which comprise the consolidated income statement, the consolidated statement of comprehensive income, the
consolidated and parent company balance sheets, the consolidated cash low statement, the consolidated and parent company
statements of changes in equity and notes to the inancial statements, including a summary of signiicant accounting policies.
The inancial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Group inancial statements is applicable law and UK
adopted international accounting standards. The inancial reporting framework that has been applied in the preparation of the Parent
Company inancial statements is applicable law and United Kingdom Accounting Standards, including Financial Reporting Standard 101
Reduced Disclosure Framework (United Kingdom Generally Accepted Accounting Practice).
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities
under those standards are further described in the Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the inancial statements section of our report.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is suficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion. Our audit opinion is
consistent with the additional report to the Audit and Risk Committee.
Independence
Following the recommendation of the Audit and Risk Committee, we were appointed by the Directors on 30 July 2020 to audit the
inancial statements for the year ended 31 March 2021 and subsequent inancial periods. The period of total uninterrupted engagement
including retenders and reappointments is three years, covering the years ended 31 March 2021 to 31 March 2023. We remain independent of
the Group and the Parent Company in accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our audit of the inancial statements
in the UK, including the FRC’s Ethical Standard as applied to listed public interest entities, and we have fulilled our other ethical responsibilities
in accordance with these requirements. The non-audit services prohibited by that standard were not provided to the Group or the
Parent Company.
Conclusions relating to going concern
In auditing the inancial statements, we have concluded that the Directors’ use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the inancial statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the Directors’ assessment of the Group and the Parent Company’s
ability to continue to adopt the going concern basis of accounting included:
• We obtained management’s assessment that supports the Directors’ conclusions with respect to the disclosures provided around
going concern;
• We challenged the rationale for the assumptions utilised in the forecasts, using our knowledge of the business, the sector and wider
commentary available from competitors and peers;
• We considered the appropriateness of management’s forecasts by testing their mechanical accuracy, assessing historical forecasting
accuracy and understanding management’s consideration of downside sensitivity analysis;
• We obtained an understanding of the inancing facilities from the inance agreements, including the nature of the facilities, covenants
and attached conditions;
• We assessed the facility and covenant headroom calculations, and reperformed sensitivities on management’s base case and stressed
case scenarios; and
• We reviewed the wording of the going concern disclosures, and assessed its consistency with the directors’ assessment of going
concern, including underlying management forecasts.
Based on the work we have performed, we have not identiied any material uncertainties relating to events or conditions that, individually
or collectively, may cast signiicant doubt on the Group and the Parent Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of at
least twelve months from when the inancial statements are authorised for issue.
In relation to the Parent Company’s reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code, we have nothing material to
add or draw attention to in relation to the Directors’ statement in the inancial statements about whether the Directors considered it
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors with respect to going concern are described in the relevant sections of
this report.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
to the members of Norcros plc
Overview
Coverage
: of Group proit before tax
: of Group revenue
: of Group total assets
Key audit matters
Pension Scheme Liability Assumptions
Acquisition accounting
Materiality
Group inancial statements as a whole
m : m based on : of Proit before tax adjusted for certain non-underlying items,
including acquisition costs and exceptional items.
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the Group and its environment, including the Group’s system of internal
control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the inancial statements. We also addressed the risk of management
override of internal controls, including assessing whether there was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a risk of
material misstatement.
Our Group audit scope focused on the Group’s principal operating locations, being those in the UK, Ireland and South Africa. In the UK
and Ireland, Norcros operates under eight separate divisions: Triton, Merlyn, Vado, Johnson Tiles, Grant Westield, Croydex, Abode and
Norcros Adhesives. In South Africa there are four divisions: Johnson Tiles South Africa, TAL, House of Plumbing and Tile Africa.
Consistent with the group’s operations, we scoped our audit at a divisional level. In the UK, full scope audits were performed by the
Group engagement team on the signiicant components, Triton, Vado and the Parent Company and speciic procedures on Johnson
Tiles. The Grant Westield full scope audit was performed by a component auditor from another BDO LLP ofice in Scotland.
The four South African divisions together with the Merlyn division, whose inance team is based in Ireland, were considered to be
signiicant components and were subject to full scope audits by BDO member irms in South Africa and Ireland respectively.
The remaining components of the Group were considered non-signiicant and these components were principally subject to analytical
review procedures by the Group engagement team.
Our involvement with component auditors
For the work performed by component auditors, we determined the level of involvement needed in order to be able to conclude
whether suficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained as a basis for our opinion on the Group inancial statements as a
whole. Our involvement with component auditors included the following:
The Responsible Individual and senior members of the Group audit team were involved at all stages of the audit process, directing the
planning and risk assessment work.
Detailed Group instructions were sent to the component auditors, which included the principal areas to be covered by the audits,
materiality levels, signiicant risks, fraud risks and other signiicant auditing and accounting matters, and further set out the information
to be reported to the Group audit team.
The Group engagement team attended planning calls with the South Africa, Ireland and Scotland teams where the scope of their work
was discussed, as well as attending planning calls with divisional management. The Group engagement team reviewed the audit working
papers of the component auditors and attended completion meetings, including attending in person at Merlyn and Grant Westield with
BDO Ireland and BDO LLP in Scotland, and the respective divisional management teams following completion of the work.
Climate change
Our work on the assessment of potential impacts on climate-related risks on the Group’s operations and inancial statements included:
• Enquiries and challenge of management to understand the actions they have taken to identify climate-related risks and their potential
impacts on the inancial statements and adequately disclose climate-related risks within the annual report;
• Our own qualitative risk assessment taking into consideration the sector in which the Group operates and how climate change affects
this particular sector; and
• Review of the minutes of Board and Audit and Risk Committee meetings and other papers related to climate change and performed a
risk assessment as to how the impact of the Group’s commitment as set out in the Strategic Report may affect the inancial statements
and our audit.
We challenged the extent to which climate-related considerations, including the expected cash lows from the initiatives and
commitments have been relected, where appropriate, in management’s going concern assessment and viability assessment.
We also assessed the consistency of management’s disclosures included as Statutory Other Information on pages 46 to 77 within
theinancial statements and with our knowledge obtained from the audit.
Based on our risk assessment procedures, we did not identify there to be any Key Audit Matters materially impacted by climate-related
risks and related commitments.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
An overview of the scope of our audit continued
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional judgement, were of most signiicance in our audit of the inancial
statements of the current period and include the most signiicant assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud)
that we identiied, including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit,
and directing the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the inancial statements
as a whole, and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters.
Key audit matterHow the scope of our audit addressed the key audit matter
Pension Scheme
Liability
Assumptions
Refer to Note
1 - summary
of signiicant
accounting policies,
key sources
of estimation
uncertainty and
critical judgements
in applying the
group’s accounting
policies and also to
Note 24 Retirement
beneit obligations.
The group has a deined beneit pension plan with
a net scheme asset of £14.9m (2022: £19.6m).
We consider there to be a signiicant risk
concerning the appropriateness of the actuarial
assumptions applied in calculating the group’s
deined beneit pension scheme liability of
£285.0m (2022: £368.3m) as shown in Note 24.
The valuation of the group’s pension scheme
liability was performed by management’s external
actuary and involves signiicant judgement from
the directors and the actuary in the choice of
discount rate used and in the key sources of
estimation uncertainty, in particular in relation to
the inlation assumptions and mortality rates, as
described in the group’s accounting policies.
We obtained the report from management’s actuary used in
valuing the scheme’s liabilities, from which we assessed the
appropriateness of the assumptions underpinning the valuation
of the scheme liabilities.
Speciically, we challenged the discount rate, inlation and
mortality assumptions applied in the calculation by using our
auditor engaged pension experts to assist us to benchmark the
assumptions applied against comparable third-party data and
assessed the appropriateness of the assumptions in the context
of the group’s own position.
Key observations:
Based on our audit work, we considered the assumptions
used in the calculation of the pension liability were within an
acceptable range.
Acquisition
accounting
Refer to Note
1 – summary
of signiicant
accounting
policies, and
Note 31 Business
combinations.
During the year, the Group acquired 100% of
Granit Holdings Limited and subsidiaries (Grant
Westield).
This acquisition was material to the Financial
Statements and there are complexities in the
accounting for business combinations including
identifying the fair value of the consideration
for the acquisition and the net assets acquired.
Furthermore, the Group was required to identify
and value any separable intangible assets
acquired as part of the transaction.
As part of this exercise, management identiied
an acquired separable intangible asset that has
been valued at £35.5m within these Financial
Statements, which involved the use of a number
of estimates.
We obtained assurance over the acquisition through:
• obtaining the sale and purchase agreement and reviewing
the key terms to check that these have been accounted for
correctly;
• inspecting the results of the due diligence exercise performed
by management’s third party experts and comparing these to
the adjustments posted in the opening balance sheet;
• reviewing the details of the acquisition to identify which separable
intangible assets were acquired as part of the transaction;
• assessing the key judgements and fair value adjustments
relating to intangibles, contingent consideration and
provisions to check they were reasonable and in line with the
relevant accounting standards with support from our internal
valuationspecialists;
• using our internal valuation experts to assist us to review the
valuation of the brand and customer relationships which were
separately valued by considering the accuracy of the model
and estimates such as the WACC used within the valuation; and
• reviewing the disclosure included in note 31 to the Financial
Statements to check that this accurately relects the
transaction and that the disclosure is compliant with the
relevant accounting standards.
Key observations:
Based on the audit procedures performed, we consider
the judgements and estimates made in accounting for the
acquisition, and the related disclosure within the Financial
Statements to be appropriate.
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of misstatements. We
consider materiality to be the magnitude by which misstatements, including omissions, could inluence the economic decisions of
reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the inancial statements.
In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower materiality level,
performance materiality, to determine the extent of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels will not necessarily
be evaluated as immaterial as we also take account of the nature of identiied misstatements, and the particular circumstances of their
occurrence, when evaluating their effect on the inancial statements as a whole.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
to the members of Norcros plc
Our application of materiality continued
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality for the inancial statements as a whole and performance materiality
as follows:
Group inancial statementsParent company for Group reporting purposes
m
m
m
m
Materiality1.601.600.480.48
Basis for
determining
materiality
5% of Proit before tax
adjusted for certain non-
underlying items, including
acquisition costs and
exceptional items.
5% of Proit before tax
adjusted for certain non-
underlying items, including
acquisition costs and
exceptional items.
Set based on 30% of
Group materiality.
Set based on 30% of
Group materiality.
Rationale for the
benchmark applied
We considered that using
this basis for determining
materiality was most
appropriate based on
the underlying trading
performance of the Group,
eliminating non-recurring
items and in the interests
of the users of the inancial
statements.
We considered that using
this basis for determining
materiality was most
appropriate based on
the underlying trading
performance of the Group,
eliminating non-recurring
items and in the interests
of the users of the inancial
statements.
Calculated as a
percentage of Group
materiality for Group
reporting purposes,
taking account of the
aggregation risk.
Calculated as a
percentage of Group
materiality for Group
reporting purposes,
taking account of the
aggregation risk.
Performance
materiality
of materiality of materiality of materiality of materiality
Basis for
determining
performance
materiality
70%, based on our
knowledge of the
aggregation risk, the
control environment
and historic
misstatement levels.
70%, based on our
knowledge of the
aggregation risk, the
control environment
and historic
misstatement levels.
70%, based on our
knowledge of the
aggregation risk, the
control environment
and historic
misstatement levels.
70%, based on our
knowledge of the
aggregation risk, the
control environment
and historic
misstatement levels.
Parent Company statutory materiality
We set materiality for the statutory audit of the Parent Company at £3.74m (2022: £3.58m) which represents 3% of Net Assets. Net assets
was determined as the most appropriate measure on which to base materiality for the statutory audit of the Parent Company inancial
statements as the principal activity of the company is that of a holding company. We further applied performance materiality levels of 70%
of the statutory materiality to our testing to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding component materiality was appropriately mitigated.
Component materiality
For the purposes of our Group audit opinion, we set materiality for each signiicant component of the Group, apart from the Parent
Company whose materiality is set out above, based on a percentage of between 30% and 50% (2022: 30% and 48%) of Group materiality
dependent on the size and our assessment of the risk of material misstatement of that component. Component materiality ranged
from £0.48m to £0.80m (2022: £0.48m to £0.77m). In the audit of each component, we further applied performance materiality levels
of 70% (2022: 70%) of the component materiality to our testing to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding component materiality was
appropriately mitigated.
Reporting threshold
We agreed with the Audit and Risk Committee that we would report to them all individual audit differences in excess of £48,000
(2022:£48,000). We also agreed to report differences below this threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative grounds.
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The other information comprises the information included in the Annual Report
and Accounts 2023 other than the inancial statements and our auditor’s report thereon. Our opinion on the inancial statements
does not cover the other information and, except to the extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express any form of
assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the other information
is materially inconsistent with the inancial statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or otherwise appears to
be materially misstated. If we identify such material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are required to determine
whether this gives rise to a material misstatement in the inancial statements themselves. If, based on the work we have performed, we
conclude that there is a material misstatement of this other information, we are required to report that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
Corporate governance statement
The Listing Rules require us to review the Directors’ statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and that part of the
Corporate Governance Statement relating to the parent company’s compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate Governance
Code speciied for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following elements of the Corporate Governance
Statement is materially consistent with the inancial statements or our knowledge obtained during the audit.
Going concern
and longer-term
viability
• The Directors’ statement with regards to the appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting
and any material uncertainties identiied set out on page 116; and
• The Directors’ explanation as to their assessment of the Group’s prospects, the period this assessment covers and
why the period is appropriate set out on page 45
Other Code
provisions
• Directors’ statement on fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 89;
• Board’s conirmation that it has carried out a robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out
on page 40;
• The section of the annual report that describes the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control
systems set out on page 87; and
• The section describing the work of the Audit and Risk Committee set out on page 90
Other Companies Act 2006 reporting
Based on the responsibilities described below and our work performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the Companies
Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and matters as described below.
Strategic Report
and Directors’
Report
In our opinion, based on the work undertaken in the course of the audit:
• the information given in the Strategic report and the Directors’ report for the inancial year for which the inancial
statements are prepared is consistent with the inancial statements; and
• the Strategic report and the Directors’ report have been prepared in accordance with applicable legal requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding of the Group and Parent Company and its environment obtained in
the course of the audit, we have not identiied material misstatements in the Strategic report or the Directors’ report.
Directors’
remuneration
In our opinion, the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited has been properly prepared in accordance
with the Companies Act 2006.
Matters on which
we are required
to report by
exception
We have nothing to report in respect of the following matters in relation to which the Companies Act 2006 requires us
to report to you if, in our opinion:
• adequate accounting records have not been kept by the Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit have
not been received from branches not visited by us; or
• the Parent Company inancial statements and the part of the Directors’ remuneration report to be audited are not in
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
• certain disclosures of Directors’ remuneration speciied by law are not made; or
• we have not received all the information and explanations we require for our audit.
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Statement of Directors’ responsibilities, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the inancial
statements and for being satisied that they give a true and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors determine is necessary
to enable the preparation of inancial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the inancial statements, the Directors are responsible for assessing the Group’s and the Parent Company’s ability to continue
as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable, matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis of accounting
unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative
but to do so.
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the inancial statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the inancial statements as a whole are free from material misstatement,
whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an auditor’s report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance,
but is not a guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a material misstatement when it exists.
Misstatements can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be
expected to inluence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these inancial statements.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT CONTINUED
to the members of Norcros plc
Auditor’s responsibilities for the audit of the inancial statements continued
Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our
procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is detailed below:
Based on our understanding and accumulated knowledge of the Group and the sectors in which it operates we considered the risk of acts
by the Group which were contrary to applicable laws and regulations, including fraud and whether such actions or non-compliance might
have a material effect on the inancial statements. These included but were not limited to those that relate to the form and content of the
inancial statements, such as international accounting standards, the UK Companies Act 2006, the Listing Rules and the UK Corporate
Governance Code; and industry related such as compliance with health and safety legislation, employment law and taxation legislation.
We communicated relevant laws and regulations to all team members, including component audit teams, to ensure they were aware of
any relevant regulations in relation to their work.
We evaluated management’s incentives and opportunities for fraudulent manipulation of the inancial statements (including the risk
of override of controls), and determined that the principal risks were related to posting inappropriate journal entries, revenue being
recognised in the correct period around the year end and management bias in accounting estimates.
Our audit procedures included, but were not limited to:
• Obtaining an understanding of the control environment in monitoring compliance with laws and regulations;
• Discussions with management, the Audit and Risk Committee, the Directors and internal and external legal counsel concerning
consideration of known or suspected instances of litigation, non-compliance with laws and regulation and fraud;
• Use of forensic specialists to assist with the risk assessment at the planning stage and to help design appropriate audit procedures;
• Reviewing minutes of Board meetings throughout the period to corroborate our enquiries and to identify any other matters not already
disclosed by management and the Directors;
• Challenging assumptions and judgements made by management in their signiicant accounting estimates, in particular in relation to
the Group’s deined beneit pension scheme liabilities (see key audit matter above) and customer rebates, incentives and promotional
support accruals;
• Testing a sample of revenue transactions around the year end to supporting documentation (including invoice and proof of delivery) for
all signiicant components to assess if the revenue had been recorded in the correct period;
• Identifying and agreeing journal entries to supporting documentation, in particular any journal entries posted with unusual account
combinations or including speciic keywords;
• Performing analytical procedures to identify any unusual or unexpected relationships that may indicate risks of material misstatement
due to fraud; and
• Agreeing the inancial statement disclosures to underlying supporting documentation.
We also communicated relevant identiied laws and regulations and potential fraud risks to all engagement team members including
component engagement teams who were all deemed to have appropriate competence and capabilities and remained alert to any
indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and regulations throughout the audit. For component engagement teams, we also
reviewed the result of their work performed in this regard.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of material misstatement in the inancial statements, recognising that the risk of
not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as fraud may involve
deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery, misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent limitations in the audit
procedures performed and the further removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events and transactions relected
in the inancial statements, the less likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on the Financial Reporting Council’s website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities. This description forms part of our auditor’s report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Parent Company’s members, as a body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Parent Company’s members those matters we are required
to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the Parent Company and the Parent Company’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report,
or for the opinions we have formed.
Gary Harding (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
Manchester, UK
14 June 2023
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
Annual Report and Accounts 2023 Norcros plc125
CONSOLIDATED INCOME STATEMENT
Year ended 31 March 2023
Notes
2023
£m
2022
£m
Continuing operations
Revenue24 41 .03 9 6.3
Underlying operating profit4 7. 34 1. 8
IAS 19R administrative expenses24(1.6)(1. 7)
Acquisition related costs5(8.4)(4.8)
Exceptional operating items5(9. 8)0.9
Operating profit2 7. 536.2
Finance costs6(6.4)(2 .8)
IAS 19R finance credit/(cost)240.6(0.4)
Profit before taxation21.73 3.0
Taxation7(4.9)(7. 3)
Profit for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company16. 82 5 .7
Earnings per share attributable to equity holders of the Company
Basic earnings per share:
From profit for the year91 9 .1p3 1. 8p
Diluted earnings per share:
From profit for the year918 .8p3 1. 2p
Weighted average number of shares for basic earnings per share (m)98 8 .18 0.9
Alternative performance measures
Underlying profit before taxation (£m)841. 83 9.3
Underlying earnings (£m)833.53 1. 5
Basic underlying earnings per share938 .0p3 8.9p
Diluted underlying earnings per share93 7. 4p3 8. 2p
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023126
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year ended 31 March 2023
Notes
2023
£m
2022
£m
Profit for the year16. 82 5 .7
Other comprehensive income and expense:
Items that will not subsequently be reclassified to the Income Statement
Actuarial (losses)/gains on retirement benefit obligations24(5.6)2 7. 5
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to the Income Statement
Cash flow hedges – fair value (loss)/gain in year21(2.9)3.0
Foreign currency translation of foreign operations(8.3)3.6
Other comprehensive (expense)/income for the year(16 . 8)3 4 .1
Total comprehensive result for the year attributable to equity holders of the Company—5 9.8
Items in this statement are disclosed net of tax.
Annual Report and Accounts 2023 Norcros plc127
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
At 31 March 2023
Notes
2023
£m
2022
£m
Non-current assets
Goodwill111 0 7. 96 1. 2
Intangible assets1259. 22 9 .1
Property, plant and equipment1324.82 9.0
Pension scheme asset2414 . 919.6
Right of use assets1420.019. 9
226.815 8 .8
Current assets
Inventories1510 3 .910 0.6
Trade and other receivables1683.37 1 .1
Derivative financial instruments21—1. 6
Cash and cash equivalents172 9.02 7. 4
216 . 22 0 0 .7
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables18(9 9. 2)(10 2 . 4)
Lease liabilities19(6 .1)(5 .7)
Current tax liabilities(0.9)(2 .7)
Derivative financial instruments21(2 .0)—
Provisions23(4. 5)—
(112.7)(11 0 . 8)
Net current assets10 3 .58 9.9
Total assets less current liabilities33 0.32 4 8 .7
Retained earnings and other reserves15 3 . 916 1. 9
Total equity210. 42 0 0.3
The financial statements of Norcros plc, registered number 3691883, on pages 125 to 159, were authorised for issue on 14 June 2023
andsigned on behalf of the Board by:
Thomas Willcocks James Eyre
Chief Executive Officer Chief Financial Officer
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts 2023128
CONSOLIDATED CASH FLOW STATEMENT
Year ended 31 March 2023
Notes
2023
£m
2022
£m
Cash generated from operations 273 7. 723.6
Income taxes paid(7. 7)(6.5)
Interest paid(5.5)(2.5)
Net cash generated from operating activities 24.514 .6
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant and equipment and intangible assets(6.0)(5.4)
Acquisition of subsidiary undertakings net of cash acquired31(78.3)—
Net cash used in investing activities (8 4.3)(5.4)
Cash flows from financing activities
Proceeds from issue of ordinary share capital251 8 .10 .1
Principal element of lease payments(4.6)(4 .7)
Drawdown of borrowings114 . 025.0
Repayment of borrowings(5 4.0)(23.0)
Dividends paid to the Company’s shareholders28(9.2)(9 .1)
Net cash generated from/(used in) financing activities 64.3(11. 7)
Net increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents4.5(2.5)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year2 7. 42 8.3
Exchange movements on cash and cash equivalents(2.9)1. 6
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year29. 02 7. 4
Annual Report and Accounts 2023 Norcros plc129
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
Year ended 31 March 2023
Ordinary
share
capital
£m
Share
premium
£m
Treasury
reserve
£m
Hedging
reserve
£m
Translation
reserve
£m
Retained
earnings
£m
Total
equity
£m
At 1 April 20218 .13 0. 2(0 .1)(1. 5)(16.4)1 2 8 .114 8 . 4
Comprehensive income:
Profit for the year—————2 5 .72 5 .7
Other comprehensive income:
Actuarial gain on retirement
benefit obligations—————2 7. 52 7. 5
Fair value gain on cash flow hedges———3.0——3.0
Foreign currency translation
adjustments————3.6—3.6
Total other comprehensive
income for the year———3.03.62 7. 53 4 .1
Transactions with owners:
Shares issued—0 .1————0 .1
Dividends paid—————(9 .1)(9 .1)
Value of employee services—————1 .11 .1
At 31 March 20228 .13 0.3(0 .1)1. 5(12 . 8)17 3 . 32 0 0.3
Comprehensive income:
Profit for the year—————16 .816. 8
Other comprehensive expense:
Actuarial loss on retirement
benefit obligations—————(5.6)(5.6)
Fair value loss on cash flow hedges———(2.9)——
(2 .9)
Foreign currency translation
adjustments————(8.3)—(8.3)
Total other comprehensive
expense for the year———(2.9)(8.3)(5.6)(16 .8)
Transactions with owners:
Shares issued0.81 7. 3————1 8 .1
Dividends paid—————(9. 2)(9. 2)
Value of employee services—————1. 21. 2
At 31 March 20238.94 7. 6(0 .1)(1. 4)(2 1 .1)176 . 5210 .4
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS
Year ended 31 March 2023
1. Group accounting policies
General information
Norcros plc (the Company), and its subsidiaries (together the Group), designs, manufactures and distributes a range of high quality
and innovative bathroom and kitchen products mainly in the UK and South Africa.
The Company is incorporated in the UK as a public company limited by shares and registered in England and Wales. The shares of the
Company are listed on the premium segment of the London Stock Exchange market of listed securities. The address of its registered
office is Ladyfield House, Station Road, Wilmslow SK9 1BU, UK. The Company is domiciled in the UK.
Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention, except for derivative financial instruments
and contingent consideration which are stated at their fair value. The Group consolidated statements have been prepared in accordance
with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards.
The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain critical accounting estimates.
It also requires management to exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies. The areas involving
a higher degree of judgement or complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are significant to the consolidated financial
statements, are detailed in the section on critical estimates on page 131. Although these estimates are based on management‘s best
knowledge of amounts, events or actions, actual results may differ from expectations.
Accounting reference date
UK company law permits a company to draw up financial statements to a date seven days either side of its accounting reference date.
For operational reasons the Company has in the current financial year adopted an accounting period of 52 weeks, and as a result of this,
the exact year-end date was 2 April 2023. All references to the financial year therefore relate to the 52 weeks commencing on 4 April 2022.
In the previous year the accounting period was 52 weeks, beginning on 5 April 2021 and ending on 3 April 2022.
Going concern
In adopting the going concern basis for preparing the financial statements, the Directors have considered the Group’s business activities
and the principal risks and uncertainties including current macroeconomic factors in the context of the current operating environment.
The Group, in acknowledging its TCFD requirements, has also considered climate risks in the financial statements.
A going concern financial assessment was developed on a bottom-up basis by taking the output of the annual budgeting process built up
by individual businesses and then subjected to review and challenge by the Board. The acquisition of Grant Westfield was also reflected
in the assessment. The financial model was then stress tested by modelling the most extreme but plausible scenario, that being a global
pandemic similar in nature to COVID-19. This has been based on the actual impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Group, which at its
peak saw a revenue reduction of 25% on the prior year over a six-month period. The scenario also incorporates management actions the
Group has at its disposal including a number of cash conservation and cost reduction measures including capital expenditure reductions,
dividend decreases and restructuring activities.
The Group continues to exhibit sufficient and prudent levels of liquidity headroom against our key banking financial covenants during
the twelve-month period under assessment. Reverse stress testing has also been applied to the financial model, which represents a
further decline in sales compared with the reasonable worst case. Such a scenario, and the sequence of events which could lead to it, is
considered to be implausible and remote.
As a result of this detailed assessment, the Board has concluded that the Company is able to meet its obligations when they fall due for a
period of at least twelve months from the date of this report. For this reason, the Company continues to adopt the going concern basis for
preparing the Group financial statements. In forming this view, the Board has also concluded that no material uncertainty exists in its use
of the going concern basis of preparation.
Summary of significant accounting policies
The principal accounting policies adopted in the preparation of the financial statements are set out as follows. These policies have been
consistently applied to all periods presented.
We are not aware of any new, amended or forthcoming accounting standards that will have a material impact on the financial statements
of the Group in the current year or future years.
Basis of consolidation
Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are all entities over which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the Group is exposed to or has rights to
variable returns from its involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those returns through its power over the entity.
The results of subsidiaries acquired or disposed of in the year are included in the consolidated financial statements from the date on
which the Group has the ability to exercise control and are no longer consolidated from the date that control ceases. Costs related to the
acquisition or disposal are not included in underlying operating profit.
Where necessary, adjustments are made to the financial statements of subsidiaries to bring them into line with those used by the Group.
All intra-Group transactions, balances, income and expenses are eliminated on consolidation.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
1. Group accounting policies continued
Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Basis of consolidation continued
Subsidiaries continued
On acquisition, the assets and liabilities and contingent liabilities of a subsidiary are measured at their fair value at the date of acquisition
and, where necessary, the accounting policies of acquired subsidiaries are adjusted to bring them in line with those of the Group. Any
excess of the consideration (excluding payments contingent on future employment) over the fair values of the identifiable net assets
acquired is recognised as goodwill. Any deficiency in the cost of acquisition below the fair values of the identifiable net assets acquired
(discount on acquisition) is credited to the Income Statement in the period of acquisition. Payments that are contingent on future
employment are charged to the Consolidated Income Statement. All acquisition costs are expensed as incurred.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty and critical judgements in applying the Group’s accounting policies
The Group’s accounting policies have been set by management and approved by the Audit and Risk Committee. The application of these
accounting policies to specific scenarios requires estimates and judgements to be made concerning the future. Under IFRS, estimates or
judgements are considered critical where they involve a significant risk that may cause a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of
assets and liabilities from period to period. This may be because the estimate or judgement involves matters which are highly uncertain,
or because different estimation methods or assumptions could reasonably have been used. Once identified, critical estimates and
judgements are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events
that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Key sources of estimation uncertainty
The key assumption concerning the future, and other key sources of estimation uncertainty at the Balance Sheet date, that has a
significant risk of causing a material adjustment to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities within the next financial year is:
• retirement benefit obligations – accounting for retirement benefit schemes under IAS 19 (revised) requires an assessment of the future
benefits payable in accordance with actuarial assumptions. The future inflation, discount rate and mortality assumptions applied in the
calculation of scheme liabilities, which are set out in note 24, represent a key source of estimation uncertainty for the Group; and
• restructuring provision – due to the proximity of the Norcros Adhesives closure decision to the year-end date, there is significant
uncertainty over the level of asset realisations that may be achieved. Therefore in calculating the appropriate level of provision, the
Group has made some estimates based on the best information available.
Critical judgements in applying the Group’s accounting policies
In the process of applying the Group’s accounting policies, the Directors have made the following judgements that have the most
significant effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements (apart from those involving estimations, which are dealt with
above) and have been identified as being particularly complex or involve subjective assessments:
• acquired intangible fixed assets – the group recognises customer relationships, brand names and trade names as intangible
assets arising on acquisition. Intangible assets can only be recognised as part of a business combination where the intangible asset
is separable from goodwill, can be reliably measured and is expected to generate future economic benefits. Judgement is required
to assess whether these criteria are met and also to subsequently determine the appropriate assumptions which are used to place a
value on the intangible asset. Had different assumptions been applied, the valuation of acquired intangible assets could have differed
from the amount ultimately recognised. Judgement is also needed to determine the useful economic lives of intangible assets and if
a different period had been determined this could have resulted in amortisation charges differing from those actually recognised;
• defined benefit pension scheme surplus – management has concluded that the Group has an unconditional right to a refund from
the UK defined benefit pension scheme once the liabilities have been discharged and that the trustees of the scheme do not have the
unilateral right to wind up the scheme. Therefore the asset is not restricted and no additional liability was recognised. See note 24 for
further details of the scheme; and
• customer rebate, incentive and promotional support accruals – a number of the Group’s customers are offered rebates, incentives
and promotional support in order to encourage trade and cement strong relationships. Accounting for such arrangements involves
judgement as agreement periods typically run for a number of months or years and may involve assumptions around volumes of
product purchased or sold into the future (for example when the assessment period is not concurrent with the Group’s financial year).
However, where applicable, accrual calculations are underpinned by signed contracts and there has historically been a strong
correlation between the amounts accrued in respect of a particular period and the amounts subsequently paid.
Revenue recognition
The Group derives revenue predominantly from the sale of goods to customers. Revenue from the sale of goods is recognised when
control of the goods has been transferred to the buyer. Control transfers when the customer has the ability to direct the use of and
substantially obtain all of the benefits of the goods. This is generally on receipt of goods by the customer.
The Group also derives revenue from services provided alongside the supply of goods, mainly installation services, which are recognised
over time and are calculated using the “input method” by reference to regular surveys of the work performed.
Revenue received in respect of extended warranties is recognised over the period of the warranty.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration received or receivable. Revenue represents the amounts receivable for goods
supplied or services provided, stated net of discounts, returns, rebates and value-added taxes. Accumulated experience is used to
estimate and provide for rebates, discounts and expected returns using the expected value method, and revenue is only recognised to
the extent that it is highly probable that a significant reversal will not occur. An accrual is made at each Balance Sheet date (included
within accruals and deferred income) as a deduction from revenue to reflect management’s best estimate of amounts to be paid in
respect of arrangements in place with customers regarding rebates, discounts and expected returns.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
1. Group accounting policies continued
Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Revenue recognition continued
Incremental costs of fulfilling a contract, such as testing costs, are capitalised in “Trade and other receivables” if the cost has been
incurred and are amortised over the life of the contract if the period over which the Group obtains benefit from is over twelve months.
Contract related support costs are accrued in “Trade and other payables” if the trigger for payment has been met. Both types of cost are
recorded in the Income Statement against underlying operating profit.
Segmental reporting
The Group operates in two main geographical areas: the UK and South Africa. All inter-segment transactions are made on an arm’s length
basis. The chief operating decision maker (being the Board) assesses performance and allocates resources based on geography and
accordingly segments have been determined on this basis. Corporate costs are allocated to segments on the basis of external turnover.
Goodwill
Goodwill is recognised as an asset and reviewed for impairment at least annually or whenever there is an indicator of impairment.
Goodwill is carried at cost less amortisation charged prior to the Group’s transition to IFRS less accumulated impairment losses. Any
impairment is recognised in the period in which it is identified and is never reversed.
Intangible assets
Acquired intangible assets comprise customer relationships, brands, trade names and patents recognised as separately identifiable assets
on acquisition as well as product certification costs and development costs which meet the criteria for capitalisation (as explained below
in the accounting policy for research and development costs). They are valued at cost less accumulated amortisation, with amortisation
being charged on a straight-line basis.
The estimated useful lives of Group assets are as follows:
Customer relationships 8–15 years
Brands, trade name and patents 8–15 years
Development costs 5 years
Product certification costs 5 years
Impairment of long-life assets
Property, plant and equipment assets are reviewed on an annual basis to determine whether events or changes in circumstances indicate
that the carrying amount of the assets may not be recoverable. If any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is
estimated as either the higher of the asset’s net selling price or value in use; the resultant impairment (the amount by which the carrying
amount of the asset exceeds its recoverable amount) is recognised as a charge in the Income Statement.
The value in use is calculated as the present value of the estimated future cash flows expected to result from the use of assets and their
eventual disposal proceeds. In order to calculate the present value of estimated future cash flows the Group uses an appropriate discount
rate adjusted for any associated risk. Estimated future cash flows used in the impairment calculation represent management’s best view
of likely future market conditions and current decisions on the use of each asset or asset group.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is initially measured at cost. Cost comprises the purchase price (after deducting trade discounts and
rebates) and any directly attributable costs. Property, plant and equipment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any
provision for impairment in value. Impairment charges are recognised in the Income Statement when the carrying amount of an asset is
greater than the estimated recoverable amount, calculated with reference to future discounted cash flows that the assets are expected
to generate when considered as part of an income-generating unit. Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is provided
on a straight-line basis to write down assets to their residual value evenly over the estimated useful lives of the assets from the date of
acquisition by the Group.
The estimated useful lives of Group assets are as follows:
Buildings 25–50 years
Plant and equipment 3–15 years
The assets’ residual values and useful lives are reviewed and adjusted if appropriate at each Balance Sheet date.
Investment property
Investment property comprises mainly land and relates to property which is either sub-let to a third party or is not being utilised in the
Group’s core operations. Investment property is held at cost less depreciation on buildings (land is not depreciated). Investment property
is depreciated over 50 years.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises direct materials, and, where applicable, labour and
overheads that have been incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition. The Group measures cost on either
a first in, first out or a standard cost basis depending on the level of manufacturing in the relevant business. Net realisable value is the
estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business, less applicable variable selling expenses. Provisions are made for slow-moving
and obsolete items.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
1. Group accounting policies continued
Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Taxation
Current tax, which comprises UK and overseas corporation tax, is provided at amounts expected to be paid (or recovered) using the tax
rates and laws that have been enacted or substantively enacted by the Balance Sheet date.
Deferred tax is the tax expected to be payable or recoverable on the difference between the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities in
the Balance Sheet and the corresponding tax bases used in the computation of taxable profits and is accounted for using the Balance
Sheet liability method.
Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all taxable temporary differences and deferred tax assets are recognised to the extent
that it is probable that taxable profit will be available against which deductible temporary differences can be utilised.
Deferred tax is calculated at the tax rates that are expected to apply in the period in which the liability is settled or the asset is realised and
is charged in the Income Statement, except where it relates to items charged or credited to equity via the Statement of Comprehensive
Income, when the deferred tax is also dealt with in equity and is shown in the Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Deferred tax charges/credits in relation to fair value movements of derivative contracts and actuarial movements in pension scheme
assets and liabilities are charged/credited directly to the Statement of Other Comprehensive Income.
Provisions
Warranty provisions – provision is made for the estimated liability on products under warranty. Liability is recognised upon the sale
of a product and is estimated using historical data.
Restructuring provisions – provision is made for costs of restructuring activities to be carried out by the Group when the Group is
demonstrably committed to incurring the cost in a future period and the cost can be reliably measured.
Property provisions – where the Group has vacated a property but is committed to a leasing arrangement, a provision is made to cover
unavoidable costs including dilapidation costs net of any expected future sub-lease income.
Provisions are measured at the best estimate of the amount to be spent and discounted where material.
Employee benefits
The Group operates various post-employment schemes, including both defined benefit and defined contribution pension plans
and post-employment medical plans.
(a) Pension obligations
A defined contribution plan is a pension plan under which the Group pays fixed contributions into a separate entity. The Group has no legal
or constructive obligations to pay further contributions if the fund does not hold sufficient assets to pay all employees the benefits relating
to employee service in the current and prior periods. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that is not a defined contribution plan.
Typically defined benefit plans define an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on
one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation.
The liability recognised in the Consolidated Balance Sheet in respect of defined benefit pension plans is the present value of the defined
benefit obligation at the end of the reporting period less the fair value of plan assets. The defined benefit obligation is calculated annually
by independent actuaries using the projected unit credit method. The present value of the defined benefit obligation is determined by
discounting the estimated future cash outflows using interest rates of high quality corporate bonds that are denominated in the currency
in which the benefits will be paid, and that have terms to maturity approximating to the terms of the related pension obligation. Surpluses
are only recognised to the extent that they are recoverable.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity
in other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise, net of the related deferred tax.
Past service costs are recognised immediately in income.
For defined contribution plans, the Group pays contributions to publicly or privately administered pension insurance plans on a
mandatory, contractual or voluntary basis. The Group has no further payment obligations once the contributions have been paid.
The contributions are recognised as an employee benefit expense when they are due. Prepaid contributions are recognised as an asset
to the extent that a cash refund or a reduction in the future payments is available.
(b) Other post-employment obligations
Some Group companies provide post-retirement healthcare benefits to their retirees. The entitlement to these benefits is usually conditional
on the employee remaining in service up to retirement age and the completion of a minimum service period. The expected costs of these
benefits are accrued over the period of employment using the same accounting methodology as used for defined benefit pension plans.
Actuarial gains and losses arising from experience adjustments and changes in actuarial assumptions are charged or credited to equity in
other comprehensive income in the period in which they arise. These obligations are valued annually by independent qualified actuaries.
(c) Termination benefits
Termination benefits are payable when employment is terminated by the Group before the normal retirement date, or whenever an
employee accepts voluntary redundancy in exchange for these benefits. The Group recognises termination benefits at the earlier of
the following dates: (a) when the Group can no longer withdraw the offer of those benefits; and (b) when the entity recognises costs
for a restructuring that is within the scope of IAS 37 and involves the payment of termination benefits. In the case of an offer made to
encourage voluntary redundancy, the termination benefits are measured based on the number of employees expected to accept the
offer. Benefits falling due more than twelve months after the end of the reporting period are discounted to their present value.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
1. Group accounting policies continued
Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Employee benefits continued
(d) Profit sharing and bonus plans
The Group recognises a liability and an expense for bonuses and profit sharing, based on a formula that takes into consideration the profit
attributable to the Company’s shareholders after certain adjustments. The Group recognises a provision where contractually obliged or
where there is a past practice that has created a constructive obligation.
Exceptional items
Exceptional items are disclosed separately in accordance with the requirements of IAS 1, ‘Presentation of financial statements’. They
include profits and losses on disposal of non-current assets outside the normal course of business, restructuring costs and large or
significant one-off items which in management’s judgement need to be disclosed to enable the user to obtain a proper understanding
of the Group’s financial performance.
IAS 19R administrative expenses
The administrative expenses incurred by the Trustee in connection with managing the Group’s pension schemes are recognised in the
Consolidated Income Statement. These costs are excluded from underlying operating profit as they do not relate to the performance of
the business.
Acquisition related costs
Acquisition related costs include deferred remuneration, amortisation of intangibles arising on business combinations and professional
advisory fees. These costs are excluded from underlying operating profit as they are non-recurring in nature or outside of the normal
course of business.
Financial assets and liabilities
Borrowings
The Group measures all borrowings initially at fair value. This is taken to be the fair value of the consideration received. Transaction costs
(any such costs that are incremental and directly attributable to the issue of the financial instrument) are included in the calculation of the
effective interest rate and are, in effect, amortised through the Income Statement over the duration of the borrowing.
Borrowings are classified as current liabilities unless the Group has an unconditional right to defer settlement of the liability for at least
twelve months after the Balance Sheet date.
Derivative financial instruments
The Group’s activities expose it primarily to the financial risks of changes in foreign exchange rates and to fluctuations in interest rates.
The Group uses derivative financial instruments (solely foreign currency forward contracts) to hedge its risks associated with foreign
currency fluctuations relating to certain firm commitments and forecasted transactions.
The Group documents, at the inception of the transaction, the relationship between hedging instruments and hedged items, as well as
its risk management objectives and strategy for undertaking various hedging transactions. The Group also documents its assessment,
both at hedge inception and on an ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions are highly effective
in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items. The Group designates net positions and hedge documentation is
prepared in accordance with IFRS 9.
The use of financial derivatives is governed by the Group’s policies approved by the Board of Directors, which provide written principles
in the use of financial derivatives consistent with the Group’s risk management strategy. The Group does not use derivative financial
instruments for speculative purposes.
Derivative financial instruments are initially measured at fair value at the contract date and are re-measured to fair value at subsequent
reporting dates. Changes in the fair value of derivative financial instruments that are designated and effective as hedges of future cash
flows are recognised directly in other comprehensive income, and any ineffective portion is recognised immediately in the Income
Statement.
Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents in the Cash Flow Statement include cash in hand and deposits held at call with banks. Cash and cash
equivalents are offset against borrowings only when there is a legally enforceable right to do so and there is a clear intention to undertake
settlement of such borrowings held with the same counterparty within a short timeframe after the year end.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables are amounts due from customers for goods sold in the ordinary course of business. If collection is expected in one year
or less they are classified as current assets; otherwise they are presented as non-current assets. Trade receivables are recognised initially
at the amount of consideration that is unconditional.
The Group holds the trade receivables with the objective of collecting the contractual cash flows, and so it measures them subsequently
at amortised cost using the effective interest method, less appropriate allowances for estimated credit losses (provision for impairment).
The Group assesses on a forward-looking basis the expected credit losses associated with its debt instruments carried at amortised cost.
The impairment methodology applied depends on whether there has been a significant increase in credit risk.
For trade receivables, the Group applies the simplified approach permitted by IFRS 9, which requires expected lifetime losses to be
recognised from initial recognition of the receivables. To measure the expected credit losses, trade receivables are grouped based on
shared credit risk characteristics and the length of time overdue. An estimate is made of the expected credit loss based on the Group’s
past history, existing market conditions and forward-looking estimates at the end of each reporting period. The maximum exposure at the
end of the reporting period is the carrying amount of these receivables.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
1. Group accounting policies continued
Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Financial assets and liabilities continued
Trade payables
Trade payables are recognised initially at fair value and subsequently measured at amortised cost using the effective interest method.
Fair value estimation
The fair value of forward foreign exchange contracts is determined using quoted forward exchange rates at the Balance Sheet date.
The Group determines the fair value of its remaining financial instruments through the use of estimated discounted cash flows.
The carrying values less impairment provision of trade receivables and payables are assumed to approximate to their fair values due to
their short-term nature. The fair value of financial liabilities for disclosure purposes is estimated by discounting the future contractual cash
flows at the current market interest rate that is available to the Group for similar financial instruments.
Research and development
Expenditure on research is charged against profits for the year in which it is incurred. Development costs are capitalised once the
technical feasibility of a project has been established and a business plan, which demonstrates how the project will generate future
economic benefits, has been approved. Development costs are amortised on a straight-line basis over their expected useful lives from
the point at which the asset is capable of operating in the manner intended by management.
Dividend distribution
Dividend distributions to the Company’s shareholders are recognised as a liability in the Group’s financial statements in the period in
which the dividends are approved by the Company’s shareholders, or when paid if earlier.
Foreign currency transactions
Functional currency
Items included in the financial statements of each entity in the Group are measured using the currency that best reflects the economic
substance of the underlying events and circumstances relevant to that entity (the functional currency). The consolidated financial
statements are presented in Sterling, which is the functional and presentational currency of the parent entity.
Transactions and balances
Monetary assets and liabilities expressed in currencies other than the functional currency are translated at rates applicable at the year end
and trading results of overseas subsidiaries at average rates for the year. Exchange gains and losses of a trading nature are dealt with in
arriving at operating profit.
Translation of overseas net assets
Exchange gains and losses arising on the retranslation of foreign operations and results are taken directly to other comprehensive income.
Share capital
Issued share capital is recorded in the Balance Sheet at nominal value with any premium at the date of issue being credited to the share
premium account.
Treasury shares
The cost of the purchase of own shares is taken directly to reserves and is included in the treasury reserve.
Hedging reserve
The hedging reserve represents the accumulated movements in the Group’s derivative financial instruments that have been designated
as hedging instruments. Amounts are transferred in and out of the reserve on the revaluation, or realisation, of identified hedging
instruments.
Share-based payments
The Group operates a number of equity-settled, share-based compensation plans. The fair value of the employee services received in
exchange for the grant of options is recognised as an expense. The total amount to be expensed over the vesting period is determined
by reference to the fair value of the options granted, excluding the impact of any non-market vesting conditions. Non-market vesting
conditions are included in assumptions about the number of options that are expected to vest. At each Balance Sheet date, the Company
revises its estimates of the number of options that are expected to vest. It recognises the impact of the revision to original estimates,
if any, in the Income Statement, with a corresponding adjustment to equity.
Share-based payments are settled through the Norcros Group Employee Benefit Trust, which holds shares in Norcros Group plc that have
either been purchased on the market or issued by the Company and satisfies awards made under various employee incentive schemes.
The shareholding of the Group Employee Benefit Trust is consolidated within the consolidated accounts of the Group.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
1. Group accounting policies continued
Summary of significant accounting policies continued
Leases
Recognition
At the date of commencement, the Group assesses whether a contract is or contains a lease by judging whether the contract is in relation
to a specified asset and to what extent the Group obtains substantially all the economic benefits from, and has the right to direct the use
of, that asset.
The Group recognises a right of use (ROU) asset and a lease liability at the commencement of the lease.
Short-term and low value assets
The Group has elected not to recognise ROU assets and lease liabilities for leases where the total lease term is less than or equal to
twelve months, or for leases of assets with a value less than £5,000. The payments for such leases are recognised within cost of sales
or administrative expenses on a straight-line basis over the lease term and presented within cash generated from operations in the Cash
Flow Statement.
Non-lease components
Fees for components such as property taxes, maintenance, repairs and other services, which are either variable or transfer benefits
separate to the Group’s right to use the asset, are separated from lease components based on their relative stand-alone selling price.
These components are expensed in the Income Statement as incurred.
Lease liabilities
Lease liabilities are initially measured at the present value of future lease payments at the commencement date. Lease payments are
discounted using the interest rate implicit in the lease, or where this cannot be readily determined, the lessee’s incremental borrowing
rate. Lease payments include the following payments due within the non-cancellable term of the lease, as well as the term of any
extension options where these are considered reasonably certain to be exercised:
• fixed payments;
• variable payments that depend on an index or rate; and
• the exercise price of purchase or termination options if it is considered reasonably certain these will be exercised.
Subsequent to the commencement date, the lease liability is measured at the initial value, plus an interest charge determined using the
incremental borrowing rate, less lease payments already made such as deposits. The interest expense is recorded in finance costs in
the Income Statement. The liability is re-measured when future lease payments change, when the exercise of extension or termination
options becomes reasonably certain, or when the lease is modified.
Payments for the principal element of recognised lease liabilities are presented within cash flows from financing activities in the Cash Flow
Statement. The interest element is recognised in net cash generated from operations.
Right of use assets
The ROU asset is initially measured at cost, being the value of the lease liability, plus the value of any lease payments made at or before
the commencement date, initial direct costs and the cost of any restoration obligations, less any incentives received. The ROU asset is
subsequently measured at cost less accumulated depreciation and impairment losses. The ROU asset is adjusted for any re-measurement
of the lease liability. The ROU asset is subject to testing for impairment where there are any impairment indicators.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
2. Segmental reporting
The Group operates in two main geographical areas: the UK and South Africa. All inter-segment transactions are made on an arm’s length
basis. The chief operating decision maker (being the Board) assesses performance and allocates resources based on geography and
accordingly segments have been determined on this basis. Corporate costs are allocated to segments on the basis of external turnover.
Finance income and costs are not split between the segments.
Year ended 31 March 2023
UK
£m
South
Africa
£m
Group
£m
Revenue295.8145.2f41.0
Underlying operating profit37.2f0.1f7.3
IAS 19R administrative expenses(1.6)—(1.6)
Acquisition related costs(8.2)(0.2)(8.4)
Exceptional operating items(9.8)—(9.8)
Operating profitf7.69.927.5
Finance costs(5.8)
Profit before taxation21.7
Taxation(4.9)
Profit for the year16.9
Net debt excluding lease liabilities(49.9)
Segmental assets340.5102.5ff3.0
Segmental liabilities(195.6)(37.0)(232.6)
Additions to goodwillf7.7—f7.7
Additions to tangible, intangibles and right of use assets5.93.79.6
Depreciation and amortisation 10.95.015.9
Year ended 31 March 2022
UK
£m
South
Africa
£m
Group
£m
Revenue252.7139.2396.3
Underlying operating profit30.910.941.8
IAS 19R administrative expenses(1.7)—(1.7)
Acquisition related costs(4.6)(0.2)(4.8)
Exceptional operating items0.9—0.9
Operating profit25.5f..756.2
Finance costs(3.2)
Profit before taxation53.0
Taxation(7.5)
Profit for the year25.7
Net cash excluding lease liabilities8.6
Segmental assets252.9106.6559.5
Segmental liabilities(1f6.9)(42.3)(159.2)
Additions to tangible and right of use assets4.04.48.4
Depreciation and amortisation 8.05.013..
The split of revenue by geographical destination of the customer is below:
2023
£m
2022
£m
UK262.0222.6
Africa ff7.5161.9
Rest of World31.552.0
f41.0396.3
No one customer had revenue over 10% of total Group revenue (2022: none).
Reported revenue within the South African segment contains £6.1m (2022: £3.9m) of revenue from services performed which have been
recognised over time and within the UK segment contains £0.3m (2022: £0.3m) of extended warranty revenue that has been recognised over time.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
3. Operating profit
Operating profit is derived after deducting cost of sales of £271.7m (2022: £255.5m), distribution costs of £35.7m (2022: £28.3m)
and administrative expenses, inclusive of exceptional and acquisition related costs, of £106.1m (2022: £76.3m).
The following items have been included in arriving at operating profit:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Staff costs (see note 4)76.225.9
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment (all owned assets)4.95.1
Amortisation of intangible assets6.33.8
Depreciation of right of use assets4.66.1
Operating lease rentals payable for short-term and low value leases:
– plant and machinery1020.7
– other0.60.4
Research and development expenditure5.54.8
All items relate to continuing operations.
Auditor’s remuneration
During the year the Group (including its overseas subsidiaries) obtained the following services from the Company’s auditor and its associates:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Audit of the Parent Company and consolidated financial statements0.2..1
Audit of the Company’s subsidiaries0.40.3
0.60.4
4. Employees
2023
£m
2022
£m
Staff costs including Directors’ remuneration:
– wages and salaries67.357.2
– social security costs 4.43.5
– share-based payments (see note 10)102f.1
Pension costs:
– defined contribution (see note 24)4.05.7
Total staff costs76.225.9
2023
Number
2022
Number
Average monthly numbers employed:
– UK1,25f1,0.2
– overseasf,122f,196
2,4462,192
Full details of Directors’ remuneration may be found in the Remuneration Report on pages 105 to 113.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
5. Acquisition related costs and exceptional operating items
An analysis of acquisition related costs and exceptional operating items is shown below:
Acquisition related costs
2023
£m
2022
£m
Intangible asset amortisation
f
6.25.7
Advisory fees
2
10ff.1
Deferred remuneration
5
0.8—
8.44.8
1 Non-cash amortisation charges in respect of acquired intangible assets.
2 Professional advisory fees incurred in connection with the Group’s business combination activities.
3 In accordance with IFRS 3, a proportion of the contingent consideration is treated as remuneration, and, accordingly, is expensed to the Income Statement as incurred. In the
current year this represents a cost of £0.8m in relation to the Grant Westfield acquisition.
Exceptional operating items
2023
£m
2022
£m
Restructuring costs
f
4.8—
Impairment
2
5.0—
Release of UK property provision
5
—(0.9)
9.8(0.9)
1 The exceptional restructuring cost charge of £4.8m was incurred in relation to the restructuring programme implemented at Norcros Adhesives, as referred to in the Chief
Financial Officer’s Report. £4.8m represents a provision for the costs associated with closure including the write down of current and non-current asset values and costs such as
redundancy. Due to realisations of assets, the net impact on cash is not expected to be material.
2 As a result of demand uncertainty, the Johnson Tiles tangible and right of use assets have been impaired with a non-cash impairment charge of £5.0m recognised as an
exceptional item in the Income Statement.
3 The UK property provision related to the only remaining surplus and legacy onerous property lease at Groundwell, Swindon. In the prior year, the Group reached agreement
with the landlord to exit the lease early. A cash settlement payment of £1.3m including dilapidation obligations was made in the prior year and the remaining £0.9m of the related
provision was released as an exceptional operating item.
6. Finance costs
2023
£m
2022
£m
Interest payable on bank borrowings3.70.8
Interest on lease liabilities1091.7
Discounting of contingent consideration0.6—
Amortisation of costs of raising debt finance0.30.2
Property lease discount—..1
Finance costs6.42.8
7. Taxation
Taxation comprises:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Current
UK taxation1093.6
Overseas taxationf.66.7
Prior year adjustment(0.7)(..1)
Total current taxation5.78.2
Deferred
Origination and reversal of temporary differences(0.8)(0.9)
Total tax charge4.97.5
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
7. Taxation continued
The tax on the Group’s profit before tax differs from the theoretical amount that would arise using the weighted average tax rate
applicable to profits of the consolidated entities as follows:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Profit before tax21.753.0
Tax calculated at domestic tax rates applicable to profits in the respective countriesf.76.8
Tax effects of:
– adjustments in respect of prior years(0.7)(..1)
– expenses not deductible for tax purposes0.20.4
– tax rate differences —0.2
Total tax charge4.97.5
The weighted average applicable tax rate was 21.7% (2022: 20.6%); the increase relates to the increased proportional taxable profits in the
UK and South Africa relative to Ireland. The standard rate of corporation tax in the UK is 19% (2022: 19%), in South Africa 28% (2022: 28%)
and in Ireland 12.5% (2022: 12.5%).
Taxation on items taken directly to other comprehensive income was a credit of £1.9m relating to deferred tax on pensions (see note 22)
and a credit of £0.8m of deferred tax in relation to foreign exchange cash flow hedges.
8. Alternative performance measures
The Group makes use of a number of alternative performance measures to assess business performance and provide additional useful
information to shareholders. Such alternative performance measures should not be viewed as a replacement of, or superior to, those
defined by Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Definitions of alternative performance measures used by the Group
and, where relevant, reconciliations from GAAP-defined reporting measures to the Group’s alternative performance measures are
provided below.
The alternative performance measures used by the Group are:
MeasureDefinition
Underlying operating profitOperating profit before IAS 19R administrative expenses, acquisition related costs
and exceptional operating items.
Underlying profit before taxationProfit before taxation before IAS 19R administrative expenses, acquisition related costs,
exceptional operating items, amortisation of costs of raising finance, discounting of
contingent consideration, discounting of property lease provisions and finance costs
relating to pension schemes.
Underlying taxationTaxation on underlying profit before tax.
Underlying earningsUnderlying profit before tax less underlying taxation.
Underlying capital employed
Capital employed on a pre-IFRS 16 basis adjusted for business combinations where
relevant to reflect the net assets in both the opening and closing capital employed
balances, and the average impact of exchange rate movements.
Underlying operating marginUnderlying operating profit expressed as a percentage of revenue.
Underlying return on capital employed (ROCE) Underlying operating profit on a pre-IFRS 16 basis expressed as a percentage
of the average of opening and closing underlying capital employed.
Basic underlying earnings per shareUnderlying earnings divided by the weighted average number of shares for basic
earnings per share.
Diluted underlying earnings per shareUnderlying earnings divided by the weighted average number of shares for diluted
earnings per share.
Underlying EBITDAUnderlying EBITDA is derived from underlying operating profit before depreciation
and amortisation excluding the impact of IFRS 16 in line with our banking covenants.
Underlying operating cash flowCash generated from continuing operations before cash outflows from exceptional
items and acquisition related costs and pension fund deficit recovery contributions.
Underlying net (debt)/cashUnderlying net (debt)/cash is the net of cash, capitalised costs of raising finance
and total borrowings. IFRS 16 lease commitments are not included in line with our
banking covenants.
Pro-forma underlying EBITDAAn annualised underlying EBITDA figure used for the purpose of calculating banking
covenant ratios.
Pro-forma leverageNet debt expressed as a ratio of pro-forma underlying EBITDA.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
8. Alternative performance measures continued
Reconciliations from GAAP-defined reporting measures to the Group’s alternative performance measures
Consolidated Income Statement
(a) Underlying profit before taxation and underlying earnings
2023
£m
2022
£m
Profit before taxation21.753.0
Adjusted for:
– IAS 19R administrative expenses1.61.7
– acquisition related costs (see note 5)8.44.8
– exceptional operating items (see note 5)9.8(0.9)
– amortisation of costs of raising finance0.30.2
– property lease discount—..1
– discounting of contingent consideration0.6—
– IAS 19R finance (income)/cost(0.6)0.4
Underlying profit before taxation41.959.3
Taxation attributable to underlying profit before taxation(8.3)(7.8)
Underlying earnings33.551.5
(b) Underlying operating profit and EBITDA (pre-IFRS 16)
2023
£m
2022
£m
Operating profit27.556.2
Adjusted for:
– IAS 19R administrative expenses1.61.7
– acquisition related costs (see note 5)8.44.8
– exceptional operating items (see note 5)9.8(0.9)
Underlying operating profitf7.361.8
Adjusted for:
– depreciation and amortisation (owned assets)5.05.2
– depreciation of leased assets4.66.1
– lease costs (6.4)(5.7)
Underlying EBITDA (pre-IFRS 14)50.565.6
Consolidated Cash Flow Statement
(a) Underlying operating cash flow
2023
£m
2022
£m
Cash generated from operations (see note 27)37.723.6
Adjusted for:
– cash flows from exceptional items and acquisition related costs (see note 27)3.31.7
– pension fund deficit recovery contributions (see note 27)3.83.3
Underlying operating cash flow44.828.6
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
8. Alternative performance measures continued
Reconciliations from GAAP-defined reporting measures to the Group’s alternative performance measures continued
Consolidated Balance Sheet
(a) Underlying capital employed and underlying return on capital employed
2023
£m
2022
£m
Net assets 210.f2.0.5
Adjusted for:
– pension scheme asset (net of associated tax)(11.2)(16.7)
Deferred Bonus Plan 2019 (DBP)Nil225p87,58f—(87,58f)——25..7.2225..7.29
Deferred Bonus Plan 2021 (DBP)Nil—109,455———109,45525.11.2525.11.5.
Deferred Bonus Plan 2022 (DBP)Nil——128,992——f28,992f9..7.25f9..7.52
Save As You Earn Scheme (ff) (SAYE)201p210p51,2.f—(22,735)(8,428)—.1..5.2251..8.22
Save As You Earn Scheme (f2) (SAYE)208p200p132,722—(867)(f9,946)111,253
.1..5.2551..8.25
Save As You Earn Scheme (f3) (SAYE)166p18.p223,8.5—(1,526)(49,396)572,993.1..5.2651..8.26
Save As You Earn Scheme (f4) (SAYE)266p—162,618——(93,398)73,221.1..5.2551..8.25
Save As You Earn Scheme (f5) (SAYE)161p——735,638—(27,95.)707,722.1..5.2251..8.22
Details of the terms of the APSP, DBP and SAYE schemes are disclosed in the Directors’ Remuneration Report.
For SAYE schemes the weighted average exercise price of all outstanding share options at 31 March 2023 was 171p (2022: 189p).
The weighted average exercise price for APSP and DBP schemes, of all outstanding share options at 31 March 2023 was £nil (2022: £nil).
In accordance with IFRS 2, the fair value of equity-settled share-based payments to employees is determined at the date of grant and is
expensed on a straight-line basis over the vesting period based on the Group’s estimate of shares that will eventually vest. A charge of £1.2m was
recognised in respect of share options in the year (2022: £1.1m) including £0.3m (2022: £0.4m) in respect of the Directors’ share options.
The highest paid Director’s share options accounted for £0.2m (2022: £0.2m) of the charge. The Group uses a Black-Scholes pricing model to
determine the annual charge for its share-based payments. The assumptions used in this model for each share-based payment are as follows:
SAYE (11)SAYE (12)SAYE (13)SAYE (14)SAYE (15)
Date of grantf6.12.18f5.12.1925.12.2.2..12.2ff2..1.25
Initial exercise price2.1p208p166p266p161p
Number of shares granted initiallyf20,2205.6,669692,9.8173,385735,679
Expected volatility50.0751..742.2%44.5765.57
Expected option life3 years3 years3 years5 years3 years
Risk free rate 0.970.3%1.571.973.87
Expected dividend yield6.176.073.8%2.874.87
APSP 2.18APSP 2.18APSP 2020APSP 2021APSP 2022
Date of grant25..7.1825..7.1925.11.2.21.07.21f9..7.22
Initial exercise priceNilNilNilNilNil
Number of shares granted initially821,025821,663970,695700,458f,.29,574
Expected volatility50.0751..742.2%64.5%65.57
Expected option life3 years5 years3 years3 years3 years
Risk free rate 0.970.971.571.973.87
Expected dividend yield6.174.073.872.87—
DBP 2.18DBP 2021DBP 2022
Date of grant25..7.1921.07.21f9..7.22
Initial exercise priceNilNilNil
Number of shares granted initially87,58f109,455128,992
Expected volatility51..764.5765.57
Expected option life3 years5 years3 years
Risk free rate 0.971.973.87
Expected dividend yield4.072.87—
The share price at 31 March 2023 was 186p. The average price during the year was 209.6p. Expected volatility is the Company’s three-year
historical share price volatility.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
11. Goodwill
2023
£m
2022
£m
At 1 April610220.8
Additionsf7.7—
Exchange differences(1.0)0.4
At 31 Marchf07.221.2
Goodwill is allocated to the Group’s cash-generating units (CGUs). A summary of the goodwill allocation is presented below:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Croydex7.97.8
Abode0.80.8
Triton Showersf2.1f9.1
Merlyn 25.525.5
Grant Westfieldf7.7—
Tile Africa2.63.0
House of Plumbing4.45.0
f07.221.2
The recoverable amount of a CGU is determined by a value-in-use calculation. These calculations use cash flow projections derived from
data and metrics used on an ongoing basis, with the key assumptions being those regarding discount rates, growth rates, future gross
margin improvements and cash flows.
The key assumptions for the value-in-use calculations are:
• cash flows before income taxes are based on approved budgets and management projections for the first five years;
• long-term growth rates of 2.0% (2022: 2.0%) for Croydex, Abode, Merlyn, Triton Showers and Grant Westfield and 4.0% (2022: 4.0%)
for Tile Africa and House of Plumbing applied to the period beyond which detailed budgets and forecasts do not exist, based on
macroeconomic projections for the geographies in which the entities operate; and
• pre-tax discount rates of 11.7% (2022: 11.4%) in the UK and 17.4% (2022: 16.8%) in South Africa based upon the risk free rate for government
bonds adjusted for a risk premium to reflect the increased risk of investing in equities and investing in the Group’s specific sectors and regions.
Management has applied sensitivities to the key assumptions, including discount rates and growth rates, and believes that there are no
reasonably possible scenarios which would result in an impairment of goodwill.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
12. Intangible assets
Customer
relationships
£m
Brands,
trade names
and patents
£m
Development
costs
£m
Product
certification
costs
£m
Total
£m
Cost
At 1 April 202158.6f..10.60.269.5
Exchange differences..1———..1
At 31 March 202258.7f..10.60.269.6
Acquisitions32.53.0——55.5
Additions——0.60.5f.1
Disposals——(0.2)—(0.2)
Exchange differences(0.2)———(0.2)
At 31 March 202371.0f3.11.00.785.8
Accumulated amortisation
At 1 April 202111.56.60.60.216.7
Charge for the year2.90.9——3.8
At 31 March 202214.25.5..60.220.5
Charge for the year5.1f.1..1— 6.3
Disposals——(0.2)—(0.2)
At 31 March 202319.36.60.50.226.6
Net book amount at 31 March 202224.54.6——29.1
Net book amount at 31 March 202351.76.50.50.55202
The amortisation charge for intangibles generated on acquisition is £6.2m (2022: £3.7m) for the year and is included in the acquisition
related costs in the Consolidated Income Statement. The amortisation charge for internally generated or acquired intangibles was £0.1m
(2022: £0.1m) and was included in the Consolidated Income Statement in the current and prior year.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
13. Property, plant and equipment
Land and
buildings
£m
Plant and
equipment
£m
Total
£m
Cost
At 1 April 202155%297.8f51..
Exchange differences0.51.52.0
Additions0.35..5.3
Disposals—(1.6)(1.6)
At 31 March 202254.0102.9f56.9
Exchange differences(f.1)(3.9)(5.0)
Additions..64.85.4
Acquisitions—6.04.0
Disposals(0.2)(5.1)(3.3)
At 31 March 202333.310f.7179.0
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 April 202120.982.1103.0
Exchange differences..1f.11.2
Charge for the year0.64.55.1
Disposals—(1.6)(1.6)
At 31 March 202221.286.3f.7.9
Exchange differences(0.4)(2.9)(3.3)
Acquisitions—2.92.9
Impairment2.12.06.1
Charge for the year0.64.34.9
Disposals(0.2)(5.1)(3.3)
At 31 March 202323.799.5113.2
Net book amount at 31 March 202212.616.229.0
Net book amount at 31 March 20239.615.224.8
Plant and equipment include motor vehicles, computer equipment and plant and machinery.
In line with guidance from the Financial Reporting Council, the Group reviews all cash-generating units to determine whether any of the
assets related to our operations are impaired. These reviews are performed by comparing the estimated future cash flows generated by
the divisions with the carrying value of the assets generating those cash flows. The future cash flows are sensitised for items including
reduced margins, increasing energy costs and working capital variances to illustrate a value in use for the business. The discount rates
used were in line with the UK pre-tax discount rates utilised in the goodwill impairment assessments. As a result of these reviews and
demand uncertainty, tangible and right of use assets within the Johnson Tiles UK business have been impaired with a non-cash impairment
charge of £5.0m recognised as an exceptional item in the Income Statement. Impairment of property plant and equipment totalled £4.1m.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
14. Right of use asset
Land and
buildings
£m
Plant and
equipment
£m
Total
£m
Cost
At 1 April 202123.94.928.8
Exchange differences0.9..11..
Additions1.91.25.1
Modifications0.9—0.9
Disposals(0.2)(0.3)(0.5)
At 31 March 202227.65.953.3
Exchange differences(2.4)(0.2)(2.6)
Acquisitions1.70.32.0
Additions1.51.85.1
Modifications2.2—2.2
Disposals(0.2)(0.3)(0.5)
At 31 March 202330.07.537.5
Accumulated depreciation
At 1 April 20212.15.19.2
Exchange differences0.3..10.4
Charge for the year3.30.86.1
Disposals(..1)(0.2)(0.3)
At 31 March 20229.63.813.6
Exchange differences(1..)(..1)(f.1)
Impairment—0.90.9
Charge for the year5.70.94.6
Disposals—(0.3)(0.3)
At 31 March 202316.35.2f7.5
Net book amount at 31 March 2022f7.82.119.9
Net book amount at 31 March 2023f7.72.320.0
Impairment in the year related to the impairment of leased right of use assets which was part of the Johnson Tiles UK impairment.
15. Inventories
2023
£m
2022
£m
Raw materials and consumables15.312.6
Work in progress1020.8
Finished goods97.f87.2
103.9100.6
Provisions held against inventories totalled £9.4m (2022: £9.1m).
The cost of inventories recognised as an expense within cost of sales in the Income Statement amounted to £232.0m (2022: £218.6m).
During the year the Group charged £1.3m (2022: £3.6m) of inventory write-downs to the Income Statement within cost of sales.
16. Trade and other receivables
2023
£m
2022
£m
Trade receivables80.228.1
Less: impairment loss allowance (1.5)(1.2)
Trade receivables – net78.726.9
Other receivables1030.9
Prepayments and accrued income3.33.3
83.33f.1
All trade and other receivables are current. The net carrying amounts of trade and other receivables are considered to be a reasonable
approximation of their fair values.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
16. Trade and other receivables continued
The carrying amounts of the Group’s trade and other receivables are denominated in the following currencies:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Sterling66.455.1
South African Rand15.216.4
Euro1.01.2
83.33f.1
Impairment of trade receivables
31 March 2023
Not yet due
£m
0–1 month
overdue
£m
1–2 months
overdue
£m
2–3 months
overdue
£m
>3 months
overdue
£m
Total
£m
Expected credit loss rate0.1.0.1.6.7.14.3.28.2%102.
Gross trade receivables 64.29.91050.73.980.2
Loss allowance 0.10.10.10.1f.1105
31 March 2022
Not yet due
£m
.–1 month
overdue
£m
1–2 months
overdue
£m
2–3 months
overdue
£m
>3 months
overdue
£m
Total
£m
Expected credit loss rate0.272.4%8.3710.0723.571.87
Gross trade receivables 58.46.11.21..3.428.1
Loss allowance ..1..1..1..10.81.2
Movements on the provision for impairment of trade receivables were as follows:
2023
£m
2022
£m
At the beginning of the year1020.9
Acquired0.2—
Provision for receivables impairment0.30.3
Receivables written off during the year as uncollectable (0.1)(..1)
Exchange differences(0.1)..1
At the end of the year1051.2
17. Cash and cash equivalents
2023
£m
2022
£m
Cash at bank and in hand29.027.6
Credit risk on cash and cash equivalents is limited as the counterparties are banks with strong credit ratings assigned by international
credit rating agencies.
18. Trade and other payables
2023
£m
2022
£m
Trade payables50.852.6
Other tax and social security payables7.55..
Other payablesf.11.9
Accruals and deferred income36.858.9
29.2102.4
The fair value of trade payables does not differ materially from the book value.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
19. Lease liabilities
Land and
buildings
£m
Plant and
equipment
£m
Total
£m
At 1 April 202121.52.924.2
Exchange differences..7—..7
Additions1.91.25.1
Modifications0.9—0.9
Disposals(..1)(..1)(0.2)
Interest charge1.2..11.7
Gross lease payments(5.0)(1.6)(6.4)
At 1 April 202221.52.724.0
Exchange differences(1.2)(0.2)(1.8)
Acquired1.70.32.0
Additions1.51.85.1
Modifications2.2—2.2
Disposals(0.2)—(0.2)
Interest charge1.7..11.8
Gross lease payments(4.9)(1.5)(6.4)
At 31 March 202321057022f.7
Lease liabilities are split into £6.1m (2022: £5.7m) payable in less than one year and £18.6m (2022: £18.3m) payable after one year.
20. Financial liabilities – borrowings
2023
£m
2022
£m
Non-current
Bank borrowings (unsecured):
– bank loans80.020.0
– less: costs of raising finance(f.1)(1.2)
Total borrowings78.918.8
The fair value of bank loans equals their carrying amount, as they bear interest at floating rates.
The repayment terms of borrowings are as follows:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Not later than one year——
After more than one year:
– between one and two years——
– between two and five years80.020.0
– costs of raising finance(f.1)(1.2)
Total borrowings78.918.8
Capital risk management
The amount of committed banking facility remains at £130m (plus a £70m uncommitted accordion). The Group exercised the first of its
two one-year extension options in the year, extending the maturity date to October 2026.
This facility provides the Group with a sound financial structure for the medium term and, by reference to the £130m facility available at
year end, with £76.2m of headroom being available at 31 March 2023 (2022: £133.4m), after taking into account net debt and ancillary
facilities in use of £2.8m (2022: £4.0m) and overseas cash. The Group has been in compliance with all banking covenants (leverage and
interest cover covenants) during the year.
Interest rate profile
The effective interest rates at the Balance Sheet dates were as follows:
2023
.
2022
7
Bank loans6.11.9
At 31 March 2023 the bank loans carried interest based on SONIA plus a margin of 1.9% (2022: SONIA plus 1.9%).
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
20. Financial liabilities – borrowings continued
Net (debt)/cash
The Group’s net (debt)/cash is calculated as follows:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Cash and cash equivalents29.027.6
Total borrowings(78.9)(18.8)
(49.9)8.6
Currency profile of net debt
The carrying value of the Group’s net (debt)/cash is denominated in the following currencies:
2023
£m
2022
£m
Sterling(71.0)(15.4)
Euro0.40.4
US Dollar0.51.6
South African Rand18.62..1
Chinese Renminbi1.62.1
(49.9)8.6
21. Financial instruments
During the year the Group held financial instruments relating to the risks of the Group’s operations.
Financial risk management
The Group’s operations expose it to a variety of financial risks: market risk (including currency risk, interest rate risk and energy price risk);
credit risk; and liquidity risk. The Group actively seeks to limit the adverse effects of these risks on the financial performance of the Group.
Currency risk
The Group operates internationally and is exposed to foreign exchange risk arising from various currencies, primarily the US Dollar, the
Euro, the Renminbi and the South African Rand. Foreign exchange risk arises from future commercial transactions, recognised assets and
liabilities and net investments in foreign operations.
Foreign exchange rate exposures are managed within approved policy parameters utilising forward foreign exchange contracts. The
foreign currency risk associated with anticipated sales and purchase transactions is hedged out up to twelve months on a rolling basis.
Basis adjustments are made to the initial carrying amounts of inventories when the inventories are initially recorded.
For the hedges of highly probable forecast sales and purchases, as the critical terms (i.e. the notional amount and life) of the foreign
exchange forward contracts and their corresponding hedged items are the same, the Group performs a qualitative assessment
of effectiveness and it is expected that the value of the forward contracts and the value of the corresponding hedged items will
systematically change in the opposite direction in response to movements in the underlying exchange rates. This means that there is an
economic relationship between the hedging instrument (the foreign exchange forward derivatives) and the hedged item (highly probable
forecast sales and purchases in foreign currency).
The notional value of the hedging instrument (the derivative) is consistent with the designated value of the underlying exposure. Therefore
the hedge ratio is 1:1 in all cases. However, potential future rebalancing can be performed if needed.
The main source of hedge ineffectiveness in these hedging relationships is the effect of the counterparty and the Group’s own credit
risk on the fair value of the forward contracts, which is not reflected in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to changes in foreign
exchange rates. Other sources of ineffectiveness arising from these hedging relationships are changes in the settlement date or amount.
However, the Group reviews all hedges on every reporting date to ensure their effectiveness.
Interest rate risk
The Group’s interest rate risk arises from long-term borrowings. The Group has the ability to secure a substantial proportion of its bank
loans at fixed rates via interest rate swaps. However, due to the cash generated to pay down borrowings and historically low UK SONIA
rates, the Group has decided not to take out any such swaps at the present time. This position is regularly reassessed.
Credit risk
Credit risk arises from cash and cash equivalents, derivative financial instruments and deposits with banks and financial institutions,
as well as credit exposures to customers. Each Group business is responsible for managing and analysing the credit risk of potential
customers prior to offering credit terms and on an ongoing basis and uses independent ratings agencies, past trading experience and
other factors in order to assess the credit quality of the customer. Additionally, the Group maintains a credit insurance policy for all its
operations which covers a substantial portion of the Group’s trade debtors. For banks and financial institutions only independently rated
parties with a strong rating are accepted.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
21. Financial instruments continued
Liquidity risk
The Group’s banking facilities are designed to ensure there are sufficient funds available for current operations and the Group’s further
development plans. Cash flow forecasting is performed by the Group’s businesses on a rolling basis and is monitored centrally to ensure
that sufficient cash is available to meet operational needs while maintaining an appropriate level of headroom on undrawn committed
borrowing facilities. At 31 March 2023 the facility had £76.2m of headroom (2022: £133.4m) after taking account of ancillary facilities and
overseas cash. The maturity date of the facility is October 2026.
Financial instruments
The Group’s financial instruments comprise borrowings, cash, trade receivables and payables, contingent consideration and forward
exchange contracts. Based on the hierarchy defined in IFRS 13, contingent consideration is classified as a level 3 instrument. An assessment
as to the extent to which the contingent consideration will be payable was undertaken at the year end, and the expected cash payment
has been discounted and recognised in non-current liabilities. The remainder of the Group’s financial instruments are classified as level
2 instruments. Consequently, fair value measurements are derived from inputs other than quoted prices included within level 1 that are
observable for the assets or liabilities, either directly (i.e. as prices) or indirectly (i.e. derived from prices).
Financial liabilities
The table below analyses the value of the Group’s financial liabilities into relevant maturity groupings based on the remaining period at the
Balance Sheet date to the contractual maturity date.
Not later
than one year
£m
Later than one
year but not later
than two years
£m
Later than two
years but not later
than five years
£m
Later than
five years
£m
Total
£m
Borrowings
f
0.40.42..7—21.5
Lease liabilities
2
5.75.211.98.150.9
Trade and other payables 102.6———102.6
At 31 March 2022108.55.652.68.1154.8
Borrowings
f
4.94.987.5—97.1
Lease liabilities
2
2.15.39.010.951.5
Trade and other payables
5
99.2—10.0—109.2
At 31 March 2023110.210.2106.310.2237.6
1 Borrowings include interest costs calculated using the applicable interest rate at year end.
2 Lease liabilities are on an undiscounted basis.
3 Trade and other payables due later than two years but not later than five years relate to contingent consideration and deferred remuneration in relation to the acquisition of Grant
Westfield and are on an undiscounted basis.
Derivative foreign currency contracts
The following table details the foreign currency forward contracts outstanding at the end of the reporting year.
Carrying
amount
£m
Notional
amount
£m
Loss
recognised in
Income
Statement
£m
Change in fair
value taken to
hedge reserve
£m
As at 31 March 2022:
Assets 1.226.3—3.9
As at 31 March 2023:
Liabilities(2.0)64.4—(3.6)
As at 31 March 2023, the aggregate amount of (losses)/gains under foreign exchange forward contracts deferred in the cash flow
hedge reserve relating to these anticipated future purchase transactions is a loss of £2.0m (2022: gain of £1.6m). It is anticipated that
the purchases will take place during the twelve months of the financial year ended 31 March 2024, at which time the amount deferred
in equity will be removed from equity and included in the carrying amount of the inventories which are expected to be sold within twelve
months of purchase.
Set out below is the reconciliation of each component of equity and the analysis of other comprehensive income:
Hedging reserve
£m
Fair value
At 1 April 20221.5
Effective portion of changes in fair value(3.6)
Amount transferred to inventories(..1)
Tax effect0.8
At 31 March 2023(1.f)
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
21. Financial instruments continued
Sensitivity analysis
IFRS 7 requires the disclosure of a sensitivity analysis that details the effects on the Group’s profit and loss and equity of reasonably
possible fluctuations in market rates. To demonstrate these, reasonably possible variations of 1% increase or decrease in market interest
rates and 5% strengthening or weakening in major currencies have been chosen.
(a) 1% increase or decrease on market interest rates for most of the coming year
As the Group has borrowings of £80.0m, the effect of a 1% change in market interest rates would be a change in the net finance costs
of approximately £0.8m (2022: £0.2m) per annum.
(b) 5% strengthening or weakening in major currencies
A number of the Group’s assets are held overseas and as such variations in foreign currencies will affect the carrying value of these assets.
A 5% strengthening or weakening of Sterling across all currencies would lead to a circa £3.3m (2022: £3.2m) decrease or increase in net
assets respectively.
The Group’s profits and losses are exposed to both translational and transactional risk of fluctuations in foreign currency risk. The Group
seeks to mitigate the majority of its transactional risk using forward foreign exchange contracts and product pricing. Taking into account
the unmitigated translational impact, a 5% strengthening or weakening in Sterling against all other currencies would result in an increase
or decrease in reported profits of circa £0.5m respectively.
22. Deferred tax
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to offset current tax assets against current tax
liabilities and when the deferred income taxes relate to the same fiscal authority.
Deferred tax is calculated in full on temporary differences under the liability method. The movement on the deferred tax account is as
shown below.
The analysis of deferred tax assets and liabilities is as follows:
Accelerated tax
depreciation
£m
Retirement
benefit
obligations
£m
Intangibles
£m
Other
£m
Total
£m
At 1 April 2021..13.5(5.7)1.2(0.5)
(Charged)/credited to the Consolidated Income Statement(0.2)0.8(..7)1..0.9
Charged to other comprehensive income—(9.2)—(0.6)(9.8)
Exchange differences—————
At 31 March 2022(..1)(4.9)(6.4)2.0(9.4)
Acquisitions(0.2)—(8.9)—(9.1)
(Charged)/credited to the Consolidated Income Statement(..1)(..7)1.20.40.8
Charged to other comprehensive income—1.9—0.82.7
Exchange differences—————
At 31 March 2023(0.4)(3.7)(ff.1)3.2(15.0)
2023
£m
2022
£m
Deferred tax assets:
– to be recovered after more than twelve months3.01.2
– to be recovered within twelve months0.20.4
3.22.0
Deferred tax liabilities:
– to be charged after more than twelve months(f.1)(11..)
– to be charged within twelve months(f7.1)(0.4)
(18.2)(11.6)
Deferred tax liabilities (net)(15.0)(9.4)
Other deferred tax assets relate to share-based payment expenses, provisions and other timing differences.
At the Balance Sheet date the Group has recognised £nil (2022: £nil) in respect of tax losses. No deferred tax asset has been recognised
in respect of £6.7m (2022: £6.7m) of UK tax losses as whilst the losses are considered to have no date of expiry, the Company does not
believe that utilisation of these losses is probable.
In the prior year, an increase to the UK corporation tax rate from 19% to 25% from 1 April 2023 was enacted and so deferred tax assets
and liabilities were grossed up accordingly.
Annual Report and Accounts Norcros plc
23. Provisions
Warranty
provision
£m
Restructuring
provision
£m
UK property
provision
£m
Total
£m
At 1 April 20211..0.92.14.0
Credited to the Income Statement——(0.9)(0.9)
Property lease discount ——..1..1
Utilisation (..1)(0.2)(1.5)(1.2)
At 31 March 20220.9..7—1.2
Charged to the Income Statement—4.5—4.5
Utilisation —(0.4)—(0.4)
At 31 March 20230.94.8—5.7
The warranty provision has been recognised for expected claims on products which remain under warranty. It is expected that this
expenditure will be incurred within five years of the Balance Sheet date.
The restructuring provision relates to costs to be incurred in relation to the aforementioned Norcros Adhesives closure and due to
uncertainty regarding timing of utilisation, the amounts are included within provisions. In addition to the £4.5m above, which has been
recognised as a current provision, £0.3m of the £4.8m charge has been credited to accruals.
24. Retirement benefit obligations
(a) Pension costs
Norcros Security Plan
The Norcros Security Plan (the Plan), the principal UK pension scheme of the Group’s UK subsidiaries, is funded by a separate trust fund
which operates under UK trust law and is a separate legal entity from the Company. The Plan is governed by a Trustee company, which has
a board currently composed of three employer representatives and three member representatives. The Trustee is required by law to act in
the best interests of the Plan members and is responsible for setting policies together with the Company.
It is predominantly a defined benefit scheme, with a modest element of defined contribution benefits. Norcros plc itself has no employees
other than the Directors and so has no liabilities in respect of these pension schemes. The scheme closed to new members and future
accrual with effect from 1 April 2013, though active members retain a salary link. This means that employed members of the Plan who
were building up benefits at the date of closure to accrual will receive a pension based on their service to 1 April 2013 but using their
final pensionable salary at the point they leave employment or retire from the Plan. As a result of the closure a new defined contribution
pension scheme was implemented to replace the Plan from the same date.
The weighted average duration of the defined benefit obligation is approximately 11 years (2022: 15 years) and can be attributed to the
scheme members as follows:
20239.92
Employee members6.2%
Deferred members24%28%
Pensioner members74.707
Total100.10.7
The Plan assets do not include any investments in the Company or any property or other assets utilised by the Company.
The Plan is funded by the Company based on a separate actuarial valuation for funding purposes for which the assumptions may differ
from those below. Funding requirements are formally set out in the Statement of Funding Principles, Schedule of Contributions and
Recovery Plan agreed between the Trustee and the Company.
In the prior year, the Group reached agreement with the Trustee on the 31 March 2021 triennial actuarial valuation for the UK defined
benefit scheme and on a new deficit recovery plan. The actuarial deficit at 31 March 2021 was £35.8m (2018: £49.3m). Deficit repair
contributions were agreed at £3.8m per annum from 1 April 2022 to March 2027 (increasing with CPI, capped at 5% per year).
In line with the previous agreement the Group made deficit recovery contributions of £3.8m (2022: £3.3m) into its UK defined benefit
pension scheme during the year to 31 March 2023.
Risks
The Plan exposes the Company to a number of actuarial risks which may result in a material change in the net scheme surplus/deficit
and potentially result in an increase in cash contributions in later years and higher charges being recognised in future Income Statements.
Given the long-term time horizon of the scheme’s cash flows this may result in volatility in the valuation of the net scheme surplus from
year to year. The main risks are set out below:
Mortality risk – the assumptions used by the Group allow for improvements in life expectancy. However, if life expectancy improves
at a faster rate than assumed, this would result in greater payments from the Plan and consequently an increase in scheme liabilities.
The Group regularly reviews the mortality assumptions to minimise the risk of using an inappropriate assumption.
Financial statements
Norcros plc Annual Report and Accounts
NOTES TO THE GROUP ACCOUNTS CONTINUED
Year ended 31 March 2023
24. Retirement benefit obligations continued
(a) Pension costs continued
Risks continued
Interest rate risk – a reduction in corporate bond yields would result in a lower discount rate being used to value the scheme liabilities and
consequently result in an increase in scheme liabilities. Additionally, an increase in inflation would increase the scheme liabilities as the majority of the
pension payments increase in line with inflation, although there are a number of caps in place to ensure that the impact of high inflation is minimised.
To mitigate some of the investment volatility a proportion of the scheme assets are held in liability-driven investments which involve hedging some
of the Plan’s exposure to changes in interest rates and inflation by investing in assets that match the sensitivity of its liabilities. This means that if
interest rates or inflation expectations change, assets and liabilities rise or fall together, and the funding level of the Plan should be less volatile.
Investment risk and currency risk – a reduction in the value of investments caused by fluctuating exchange rates and a variety of other
market factors would result in a lower valuation of scheme assets. The scheme invests in a diversified range of asset classes to mitigate the
risk of falls in any one area of the investments and implements partial currency hedging on the overseas assets to mitigate currency risk.
Defined contribution pension schemes
Contributions made to these schemes amounted to £4.0m (2022: £3.7m).
(b) IAS 19R, ‘Employee benefits’
Norcros Security Plan
The valuation used for IAS 19R disclosures has been based on the most recent actuarial valuation at 31 March 2021 and updated by Isio,
a firm of qualified actuaries, to take account of the requirements of IAS 19R in order to assess the liabilities of the scheme at 31 March 2023.
Scheme assets are stated at their market value at 31 March 2023.
(i) The principal assumptions used to calculate the scheme liabilities of the Norcros Security Plan under IAS 19R are:
2023
Projected
unit
2022
Projected
unit
Discount rate4.90%2.757
Inflation rate (RPI)3.25%5.7.7
Inflation rate (CPI)2.55%2.9.7
Increases to pensions in payment (other than pre-1988 GMP liabilities)2.90%3.557
Salary increases 2.80.5.157
The mortality assumptions are based on standard mortality tables which allow for future mortality improvements and are summarised below: